maths problem
|
rodda |
Posted on 11-08-2009 08:40
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2276
Joined: 17-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
how do i isolate T in terms of k, t, h and I from:
-kt = ln(T-I) + hT
ln=loge..
err help me im blanking massively..
|
|
|
|
Stijn_vranken |
Posted on 11-08-2009 09:16
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1638
Joined: 28-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
You are not given any value ?
or do you just need to derive it according to each term?
prevent hangovers --> stay drunk
pozzato, basically the most stupid cyclist around
RIP WW. Gone but not forgotten
|
|
|
|
rodda |
Posted on 11-08-2009 09:41
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2276
Joined: 17-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
just need to have it in the form T=
its part of an application task
|
|
|
|
mb2612 |
Posted on 11-08-2009 09:58
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5759
Joined: 18-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
are you given another equation because with the two capital T's there I can't see a way of isolating T.
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182] Team Santander Media Thread[/url]
Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
|
rodda |
Posted on 11-08-2009 11:02
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2276
Joined: 17-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
only the equation which is that ones derivative
|
|
|
|
Wyman |
Posted on 11-08-2009 11:17
|
Domestique
Posts: 645
Joined: 28-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I got T= -kth/2
But i'm a bit brain dead after not looking at maths for 3 months after Uni... So i expect it is wrong
|
|
|
|
niconico |
Posted on 11-08-2009 11:41
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4102
Joined: 09-07-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Wyman wrote:
I got T= -kth/2
But i'm a bit brain dead after not looking at maths for 3 months after Uni... So i expect it is wrong
I haven't had a math class in a year and a half, but I think you need to use the number 'e' somehow to resolve lin, but I'm far from certain. I could solve it very easily with my calculator, but I guess you need the calculations in-between aswell.
|
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 13:04
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
Wyman |
Posted on 11-08-2009 11:47
|
Domestique
Posts: 645
Joined: 28-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
A_Schleck wrote:
Wyman wrote:
I got T= -kth/2
But i'm a bit brain dead after not looking at maths for 3 months after Uni... So i expect it is wrong
I haven't had a math class in a year and a half, but I think you need to use the number 'e' somehow to resolve lin, but I'm far from certain. I could solve it very easily with my calculator, but I guess you need the calculations in-between aswell.
Haha oh yeah, just got up didn't see the other equation...
Ohwell i tried i'll go back to being lazy again xD
|
|
|
|
mb2612 |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:02
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5759
Joined: 18-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
rodda wrote:
only the equation which is that ones derivative
I think you probably need that as well, could you give it to us?
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182] Team Santander Media Thread[/url]
Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
|
Stijn_vranken |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:04
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1638
Joined: 28-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
damn, i hate maths.
lets make a poll all who hate maths say "aye"
prevent hangovers --> stay drunk
pozzato, basically the most stupid cyclist around
RIP WW. Gone but not forgotten
|
|
|
|
Wyman |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:08
|
Domestique
Posts: 645
Joined: 28-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
AYE!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
mb2612 |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:18
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5759
Joined: 18-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ok, I have solved it:
T=(W(h*e^-tk-bh)+bh)/h
where W is the product log or Lambert function.
https://mathworld.wolfram.com/LambertW...ction.html
I got a computer to solve this so it should be correct.
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182] Team Santander Media Thread[/url]
Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
|
Wyman |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:20
|
Domestique
Posts: 645
Joined: 28-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
So i was close then..... lmao
Never seen that formula in my life so i never stood a chance xD
Oh and is the b supposed to be I?
Edited by Wyman on 11-08-2009 12:25
|
|
|
|
Wyman |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:37
|
Domestique
Posts: 645
Joined: 28-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
double post............
Edited by Wyman on 11-08-2009 12:38
|
|
|
|
mb2612 |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:37
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5759
Joined: 18-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Wyman wrote:
So i was close then..... lmao
Never seen that formula in my life so i never stood a chance xD
Oh and is the b supposed to be I?
yeah sorry I had to change it in the computer becuase it kept assuming I was an imaginary number.
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182] Team Santander Media Thread[/url]
Please assume I am joking unless otherwise stated
|
|
|
|
Wyman |
Posted on 11-08-2009 12:39
|
Domestique
Posts: 645
Joined: 28-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Haha ok i thought so
|
|
|
|
rodda |
Posted on 11-08-2009 13:57
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2276
Joined: 17-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
haha :S
pretty sure we arent meant to know the product log.
i'll post the original equation tomorrow.
|
|
|