|
Watts in Giro
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 08:45
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 08-06-2009 18:42
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
 Amazing. The top 5, bar Basso, achieved their highest level in a grand tour ever. Menchov's almost 470W on the second climb of the TT is astonishing, as is Sastre's 460W at Vesuvius, a climb harder than Alpe d'Huez, after 3 weeks of racing. What's more, The level of this years Giro, is, according to these wattages, higher then that of last years Tour, much higher even. Because the highest average there was Sastre, 425W
That would not be enough for top 5 this year....
Other notes: Cunego never above 400W. Armstrong 40W away from his 1999-2005 form. Basso only 9W worse than his 2006 Giro, so he isn't much weaker, the opposition is just far stronger than that of 2006, where Basso easily won.
Also strange that Menchov, Di Luca, Pellizotti, Sastre all ride their best grand tour ever. To compare, Menchov Vuelta wins were at 425W average. Sastre's Tour win also 425W... |
| |
|
|
| BenBarnes |
Posted on 08-06-2009 18:46
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 277
Joined: 28-04-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
How do differing mountain types affect wattages. Is it not true that Giro mountains are generally more intense whereas the Tours are longer? |
| |
|
|
| Goldberger |
Posted on 08-06-2009 18:51
|
Domestique
Posts: 504
Joined: 14-02-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Very interesting read. I'm not an expert on watts, but it's interesting to see the level that was at the giro.
Basso only 9W weaker than in 2006 where he crushed the opposition, interesting. |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 08-06-2009 19:08
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
WARNING: the time trial's climbs were too short to be considered, and done by many riders with time trial equipment.
Which is another reason the "Termine" climb cannot be compared to other races.
Therefore the real average is 430 watts.
Very high? Yes.
Edited by issoisso on 08-06-2009 19:09
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| Eddy Merckx |
Posted on 08-06-2009 19:20
|
Under 23
Posts: 69
Joined: 20-05-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
How do you messaure these wattages?
or where can i read what wattages that climber had on the specific climb?
Interesting to see, what was Basso wattages up Monte Bondone in 2006? |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 08-06-2009 19:46
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
WARNING: the time trial's climbs were too short to be considered, and done by many riders with time trial equipment.
Which is another reason the "Termine" climb cannot be compared to other races.
Therefore the real average is 430 watts.
Very high? Yes. Meh, the Termine climb was 10km at 5,5%, and all GC riders used normal bikes, not TT bikes. |
| |
|
|
| Wolfos |
Posted on 08-06-2009 19:50
|
Free Agent
Posts: 134
Joined: 19-09-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ruben wrote:
Meh, the Termine climb was 10km at 5,5%, and all GC riders used normal bikes, not TT bikes.
Sastre used full TT equipment, but the others listed used normal bikes, yes. |
| |
|
|
| Guido Mukk |
Posted on 08-06-2009 19:51
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15830
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ruben wrote:
issoisso wrote:
WARNING: the time trial's climbs were too short to be considered, and done by many riders with time trial equipment.
Which is another reason the "Termine" climb cannot be compared to other races.
Therefore the real average is 430 watts.
Very high? Yes. Meh, the Termine climb was 10km at 5,5%, and all GC riders used normal bikes, not TT bikes. |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 08-06-2009 20:18
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
The wattages are higher because of the short distance (62km compared to a climb after 200km)...
Not because of the TT helmets a few used... |
| |
|
|
| mattiasgt |
Posted on 08-06-2009 20:58
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2471
Joined: 15-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
How come the Blockhause is so low compared to the Vesuvio when that stage was much longer?
EDIT: Rest day effect maybe?
Edited by mattiasgt on 08-06-2009 20:59
(Previously) Manager of Koenigsegg
Koenigsegg: ( Media)
Livin' Loud |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 08-06-2009 21:01
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
That, plus the fact that the favourites were watching eachother a lot |
| |
|
|
| Guido Mukk |
Posted on 08-06-2009 21:05
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15830
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ruben wrote:
That, plus the fact that the favourites were watching eachother a lot
Not realy..Pellizotti was at the front..
Di Luca was going all out on that climb..all out day for Di Luca. Only Menchov and Garzelli some how managed to follow..
Maybe shorter distance? |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 08-06-2009 21:09
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ruben wrote:
Not because of the TT helmets a few used...
TT BARS. They're illegal in road races and provide a much better frontal profile. The increase in speed is very marked by using them.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 08-06-2009 21:33
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Meh, I still think it's mainly the distance and average percentage (only 5%) that caused the higher watts, rather then the TT position (it's overrated) |
| |
|
|
| Deadpool |
Posted on 08-06-2009 21:35
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 06-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ruben wrote:
Meh, I still think it's mainly the distance and average percentage (only 5%) that caused the higher watts, rather then the TT position (it's overrated)
Not in the slighest |
| |
|
|
| fenian_1234 |
Posted on 09-06-2009 09:40
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4790
Joined: 06-12-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
So, I wonder if Ricco, Piepoli and Sella had rode this year as they rode last year, how would they have done?
I think Ricco would've been 3rd on GC.
Piepoli and Sella wouldn't have won a thing, imo.  |
| |
|
|
| Bosskardo |
Posted on 09-06-2009 13:33
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1559
Joined: 07-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
fenian_1234 wrote:
So, I wonder if Ricco, Piepoli and Sella had rode this year as they rode last year, how would they have done?
I think Ricco would've been 3rd on GC.
Piepoli and Sella wouldn't have won a thing, imo.
I think you´re right if you consider their strenght on dope. Without it they would all have sucked (ok maybe a stage top3 for Ricco).
|
| |
|
|
| KurtinSC |
Posted on 09-06-2009 14:07
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 997
Joined: 20-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
So... it hasn't been stated yet but someone has to...
is this proof that they are all on the next generation of doping (whatever comes after CERA)?
We're all pretty sure that Di Luca doped a couple years back... and he just surpassed those results. A lot of older riders putting up the best wattages of their lives doesn't give me a lot of hope that things are getting cleaner in cycling. |
| |
|
|
| Phanekim |
Posted on 10-06-2009 10:44
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 361
Joined: 05-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
these results are incredibly depressing. |
| |
|
|
| ReschNicolai |
Posted on 10-06-2009 11:35
|
Stagiare
Posts: 188
Joined: 21-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
But isn't this because this years giro was easy?
And if they are doped, hope they all get caught, and locked out 4ever!
Favorite riders: All non Italians.
Favorite team: Astana and Cervélo
 |
| |
|
