|
curious about merckx
|
| mpritch |
Posted on 20-04-2008 21:50
|
Under 23
Posts: 78
Joined: 06-11-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I was just wondering what people may give Eddy Merckx as far as rankings. Trying to mix his climbing ability in addition to his stamina and determination for the spring classics (both hilly and cobbled), and his ability to win more stages than anyone is a testament to his ability to sprint. I just thought it would be interesting to see. Sorry if a question like this has already been asked, I looked and couldn't find anything. |
| |
|
|
| Waghlon |
Posted on 20-04-2008 22:04
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6542
Joined: 18-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Im inclined to say he's an 85 MO. Like seriously.
THE THOMAS VOECKLER PROPHET OF PCM DAILY
 |
| |
|
|
| Deadpool |
Posted on 20-04-2008 22:07
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6727
Joined: 06-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
85 MO, 78 COB, 82 HIL, 75 SP - He was the bomb
EDIT: Also, 82 STA
Edited by Deadpool on 20-04-2008 22:08
|
| |
|
|
| matt493 |
Posted on 20-04-2008 22:14
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3263
Joined: 01-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I'd say make it easy and just put everything at 85.
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 20-04-2008 22:35
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 19134
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
if any realism was in order, it'd be impossible to simulate. he'd have about 80 mountain and 400 or so for both stamina and resistance 
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 20-04-2008 22:49
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 27880
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Actually, there was a bug in PCM08, causing riders to get skills way above the max of 85. So, after some months of training, some riders had 162 in mountain, etc.
(Oh, damn it, I will be so sued now  ) |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 20-04-2008 22:59
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 19134
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
(Oh, damn it, I will be so sued now )
Edited by issoisso on 20-04-2008 22:59
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 29-04-2026 09:48
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| matt493 |
Posted on 20-04-2008 23:00
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3263
Joined: 01-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
(Oh, damn it, I will be so sued now )
|
| |
|
|
| mattpritch |
Posted on 21-04-2008 00:30
|
Amateur
Posts: 4
Joined: 07-11-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
well, in comparison to PCM's 08 db, where the highest climbing stat is 80, I wouldn't give him an 85. Here is what I was thinking so far (in the parenthesis is the db's highest ranking)
fl - ?
mo - 82 (80)
hil - 80 (81)
dh - ? (85)
tt - ? (80)
sta - 82 (81)
res - 83 (80)
rec - 85 (80)
cob - 76 (80)
ftr - 85 (85)
sp - 74 (80 or 81)
acc - 81 - (85)
are those realistic? i have no clue how he accelerated in races, or if he was a solid time trial rider. i don't know if he was a great downhill rider either...
|
| |
|
