PCM.daily banner
28-10-2026 16:39
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 50

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 54,996
· Newest Member: sergiales_lp_1988
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2013
 Print Thread
How accurate are the game's gradients?
Tafiolmo
Whenever I look at Cyanide's profiles and compare climbs from different years, there are some large differences, which makes me think just how accurate are these gradients. I know when somebody designs a stage they can get things right. For example looking at the Tour Down Under and a climb like Checker Hill in the 2014 route it has an average gradient of 6.1% and a maximum of 7.6%. In an earlier route from 2011 it had an average 5.5% and a maximum of 11.9%, which is a big difference in its maximum gradient!

I did some independent research on the internet and saw there is just one way up this climb and its maximum depending where you look is between 14-16%.

So where do Cyanide get their data from, as these differences are quite huge.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 28-10-2026 16:39
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
The Hobbit
The data and route is ok, but it all depends on the stage. So it doesn't follow the exact route as PCM works on a 1:10 scale, which mostly keeps gradients intact, but causes issues, so things like switchbacks are hard to do, it's all quite relative, making the game acurate is almost impossible, the hill I live on is deadly steep, in the game it's 3%, about 6% lower than real life.
 
Tafiolmo
Ok I understand this, but if this is the case why are there differences between the figures given on Checker Hill between the PCM2011 and PCM2013 games? We're talking about the same climb or have Cyanide changed the scaling since then?
 
Selwink
Are you sure they ascend it on the same side? If they do, it might be a not 100% accurately made stage or something
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/micro/npn.png[PCT] Novatek-Panarmenian.net
[ICL] Sugoi-Xanterra & Canada Dry Dev Team
Stages (Requests closed)

i.imgur.com/vR8EVAA.png

'But why were [...] they helped to get to space? To find answers, we must look at predictions not of science, but of science-fiction.'
Ancient Aliens
 
547984
It really depends on who makes the stage. Some stagemakers opt for lower percentages because the game plays better that way, although it may be inaccurate.
i1360.photobucket.com/albums/r657/547984/truth-vi.png
 
Tafiolmo
Selwink wrote:
Are you sure they ascend it on the same side? If they do, it might be a not 100% accurately made stage or something


I thought it ascended on the same side, but now I'm not so certain, if it ascends on two sides then that would explain the difference.Smile
 
Pellizotti2
Unless both stages are based on the same .zcts file, it's almost impossible to get the exact same gradient for every meter of the climb
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png Manager of Kazzinc Procycling i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/kzi.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/storywriter.png

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2012/stagemaker.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Casper on high speed
Casper on high speed
PCM06: Funny screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 28,276 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 25,645 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 20,152 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 19,774 PCM$
bullet baseba... 17,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Marcovdw 25,100 PCM$
bullet Ollfardh 24,090 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 19,800 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,920 PCM$
bullet Caspi 14,730 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.15 seconds