|
Nibali SRM Power Data
|
| itturri |
Posted on 14-07-2012 07:31
|
Amateur
Posts: 2
Joined: 25-02-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Hello, here is the SRM Power Data 2HC Climbs anda 1 Cat Finish
https://www.srm.de...-de-france |
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 14-07-2012 09:53
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Interesting - Science of Sport tweets on the data:
"Nibali averaged 5.6W/kg to finish in the yellow jersey group in Alps. Anyone still think 6.5W/kg is possible clean?"
"Point is,2012's best are 5-13% slower than previous generation. Even tactics & normal variation don't explain that. More analysis to come.."
"Just for context, if elite marathon runners slowed by even 8%, they'd run 2:14 instead of 2:04. We'd wonder what happened? And note that none of this proves it's CLEAN,but only cleaner - fewer people doping less. Much to do still, but let's take the positives we can."
PLEASE NOTE 6.5W/kg is still possible on less demanding stages with shorter climbs at the finish he is commenting in the context of the last climb on a big Alpine stage. Interesting that performance is even below their original estimation that performance would be around 5.9W/kg. Look forward to the full analysis.
Edited by ianrussell on 14-07-2012 09:56
|
| |
|
|
| johannes-w |
Posted on 14-07-2012 09:57
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 833
Joined: 24-04-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
quite interesting - thanks for posting! |
| |
|
|
| CountArach |
Posted on 14-07-2012 10:05
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Thanks to both of you for posting those things. Really interesting.
I hope we see some data from Sky. Wishful thinking.
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 04:25
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 14-07-2012 11:07
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
CountArach wrote:
Thanks to both of you for posting those things. Really interesting.
I hope we see some data from Sky. Wishful thinking.
They started doing the data of Siutsou for the whole Tour, but they had to change the plans and so they're doing Eisel data's all Tour from now here. Obviously not climbers, but at least something.
|
| |
|
|
| CountArach |
Posted on 14-07-2012 11:15
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 8290
Joined: 14-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
CountArach wrote:
Thanks to both of you for posting those things. Really interesting.
I hope we see some data from Sky. Wishful thinking.
They started doing the data of Siutsou for the whole Tour, but they had to change the plans and so they're doing Eisel data's all Tour from now here. Obviously not climbers, but at least something.
Yeah it is kind of meaningless without Wiggins or the big domestiques. Still, better than nothing.
|
| |
|
|
| Jupi |
Posted on 14-07-2012 12:26
|
Amateur
Posts: 14
Joined: 13-06-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Nice, the SRM date seems to confirm my calculations posted in the Sky doping thread. They took a rest on the flat part, as you can see, which reduces the average a bit, I have the average of the actual uphill parts at 5.7 w/kg for the best.
CountArach wrote:
Yeah it is kind of meaningless without Wiggins or the big domestiques. Still, better than nothing.
Since Wiggins arrived with Nibali, the same number applies to him too. As for the domestiques, Froome has the same number too, but he could have gone faster, Porte draged the group at 5.6 until Nibali attacked and he pulled to the side. Rogers stoped working soon after the climb started, not much can be said about him. |
| |
|
|
| samdiatmh |
Posted on 14-07-2012 12:27
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 892
Joined: 29-12-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
They started doing the data of Siutsou for the whole Tour, but they had to change the plans and so they're doing Eisel data's all Tour from now here. Obviously not climbers, but at least something.
was this decided before or after Sivtsov withdrew?
would've been interesting to see hios numbers had he not have withdrawn, it would have been him instead of Rogers sitting on the front for most of the stage |
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 14-07-2012 12:28
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
samdiatmh wrote:
Alakagom wrote:
They started doing the data of Siutsou for the whole Tour, but they had to change the plans and so they're doing Eisel data's all Tour from now here. Obviously not climbers, but at least something.
was this decided before or after Sivtsov withdrew?
would've been interesting to see hios numbers had he not have withdrawn, it would have been him instead of Rogers sitting on the front for most of the stage
That was decided after he broke his leg Indeed, Siutsou would do the work Rogers/EBH are doing now longer.
|
| |
|
|
| ianrussell |
Posted on 14-07-2012 14:26
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3440
Joined: 09-10-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
As Jupi says the data is the same for all those finishing in the lead group so Wiggins, Froome (ignoring the tiny difference 2 seconds would make), Nibali, etc.
The last climb when people at the front are guarenteed to be riding hard is the key. They all started and finsihed the climb together so the same numbers apply to all of them.
Previous estimates have been extrapolated from Jani Braj data (possible to do this very accurately) but nice to have bonefide info on the lead group.
Edited by ianrussell on 14-07-2012 14:46
|
| |
|
