PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 13:32
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 69

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,811
· Newest Member: eganyu
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Football
 Print Thread
2010 World Cup South Africa
kumazan
Oh yeah Chilavert.

 
niconico
Haha, how can you not love that guy :lol:
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys14/bampo.png
 
valverde321
Boring match. Not that I expected anything better.
 
CrueTrue
What happened to Buffon?
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Deadpool
CrueTrue wrote:
What happened to Buffon?


Hamstring pull. The commentators were at a loss as to how.
Edited by Deadpool on 14-06-2010 22:01
 
Whatsup
Didnt watch Japan-Cameroon but saw the goal. I would have never bet on Japan and yet they made it through. With regards to Italy-Paraguay, that match was entertaining - nothing special. On one side, Italy looked like an average team and I daresay Italy'll be kicked off in the knockout. On the other, Paraguay showed up not good and not bad - cannot tell.

As for France, I heard Domenech should send Malouda on for Gourcuff. Malouda could come on the left wing instead of Ribery and then Ribery would be the playmaker! Anelka and Govou remain. That sounds much better anyway! Smile
We are condemned to be free
 
ruben
Japan is well organized and disciplined.

Cameroon is like every African team. Disorganized and chaotic. There was no plan of attack. They just did whatever they felt like.
 
ponka00
Whatsup wrote:
Didnt watch Japan-Cameroon but saw the goal. I would have never bet on Japan and yet they made it through. With regards to Italy-Paraguay, that match was entertaining - nothing special. On one side, Italy looked like an average team and I daresay Italy'll be kicked off in the knockout. On the other, Paraguay showed up not good and not bad - cannot tell.

As for France, I heard Domenech should send Malouda on for Gourcuff. Malouda could come on the left wing instead of Ribery and then Ribery would be the playmaker! Anelka and Govou remain. That sounds much better anyway! Smile


The team that wins the world cup is nearly always a team that doesn't impress in the group stages. I think that Italy will be extremely dangerous in the knock-outs.

I don't think that Gourcuff should be left out. He is the only proper playmaker in the squad and he wasn't that bad either. He connected well with his team mates with some good passes. Govou played much worse IMO.
 
Whatsup
ruben wrote:
Japan is well organized and disciplined.

Cameroon is like every African team. Disorganized and chaotic. There was no plan of attack. They just did whatever they felt like.


And I feel almost startled by those asiatic teams. They've really improved and may likely go further - pay attention.

ponka00 wrote:
The team that wins the world cup is nearly always a team that doesn't impress in the group stages. I think that Italy will be extremely dangerous in the knock-outs.

I don't think that Gourcuff should be left out. He is the only proper playmaker in the squad and he wasn't that bad either. He connected well with his team mates with some good passes. Govou played much worse IMO.


Firstly, you are right but Italy seem to struggle to score once in a match and it wouldnt shock me at all to see them thrown away from the knockout-start.

Secondly, Gourcuff is sincerely not appreciated by his teammates and that brings on lots of difficulties to avoid. Besides, I didnt find Gourcuff usefull and he played bad as a playmaker either. As I said in another post ealier, Govou and Anelka should be sent off for Gignac and Henry to come on. That being said, that's merely a point of view.
Edited by Whatsup on 14-06-2010 23:39
We are condemned to be free
 
ruben
If Italy gets 2nd in their group round it's over. Then they face the Netherlands in 1/8th finals. They'll lose as bad as in 08
 
issoisso
Funny how Italy instantly looked world class the moment they went 4-4-2. De Rossi is a beast and the moment he was unleashed....jesus.

Basically, Marchisio was both being dreadful and robbing Montolivo and De Rossi of space. And taking off Marchisio to go 4-4-2 gave them the space back.

Italy have a problem in midfield. Without Totti they have no one to split the defence other than Cossu. And Lippi won't play Cossu.

But if they're going to play as they did today when they go 4-4-2, it's irrelevant. They were amazingly good once they did.


Whatsup wrote:
As for France, I heard Domenech should send Malouda on for Gourcuff. Malouda could come on the left wing instead of Ribery and then Ribery would be the playmaker! Anelka and Govou remain. That sounds much better anyway! Smile


Ribéry in the center? Best way to lose a game if ever there was one.

ruben wrote:
Japan is well organized and disciplined.


Imagine how good they might be if their coach wasn't an idiot who keeps their 4-5 best players on the bench for the sake of playing the guys he likes

ruben wrote:
Cameroon is like every African team. Disorganized and chaotic. There was no plan of attack. They just did whatever they felt like.


Not every African team. South Africa are decently organized. Ghana are very well organized.


ruben wrote:
If Italy gets 2nd in their group round it's over. Then they face the Netherlands in 1/8th finals. They'll lose as bad as in 08


Doubt it.

Then again, Cannavaro is dreadful
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 13:32
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
jph27
ruben wrote:
If Italy gets 2nd in their group round it's over. Then they face the Netherlands in 1/8th finals. They'll lose as bad as in 08


Are you serious?
 
stuartmcstuart
jph27 wrote:
ruben wrote:
If Italy gets 2nd in their group round it's over. Then they face the Netherlands in 1/8th finals. They'll lose as bad as in 08


Are you serious?


He is dutch. I suppose there is a half decent possibility it could happen...I don't think Italy will cope with the flair, pace and guile provided by the Netherlands attack, even if it only turns up for c. 20 minutes a match
 
Smowz
I really enjoyed yesterdays evening game, I thought Paraguay were combative and pushed Italy out of a comfort zone and challenged them to find a way through.

Italy played pretty well in the second half, the delivery into the box was good from both teams. Paraguay are clearly a half decent side like the US and Mexico and will require respect by any potential second round opponent.

I didn't see the earlier games, Denmark appear to have played defensively, no great surprise but good riddence that they got beaten playing that way. Based on the other game you would expect Holland to stroll the group. I don't rate the Cameroon coach at all, as organised as Japan might be they are not really that good, Cameroon's second round prospects seem doomed.

Looking into the Crystal ball here sees Argentina probably winning Group B (they should have enough to wallop Greece and expose South Korea), Germany appear well placed to dominate Group D, Holland should top group E also. Group A, C and now F look less predictable with the 'top' seeds France, England and Italy drawing their opening games. We could see the doomsday scenerio of Argentina vs France, England vs Germany and Holland vs Italy and then South Korea/Nigeria vs Mexico/South Africa, USA/Slovenia vs Ghana, Denmark/Japan vs Paraguay/Slovakia.

It is worth keeping an eye on because this appears to be an oppurtunity for an African team (South Africa, Ghana or Nigeria) to make the Semi Final as the Group A winners second round meet the winner of the Group C winners second round in the Quarter Final.

Anyway I will put my crystal ball away, today I am supporting Slovakia, Portugal and Brazil and hopefully some more goals and attacking play.
Edited by Smowz on 15-06-2010 09:54
 
Whatsup
Smowz wrote:
I really enjoyed yesterdays evening game, I thought Paraguay were combative and pushed Italy out of a comfort zone and challenged them to find a way through.

Italy played pretty well in the second half, the delivery into the box was good from both teams. Paraguay are clearly a half decent side like the US and Mexico and will require respect by any potential second round opponent.


Bear in mind that Paraguay managed very well during the WC qualifying. Furthermore, they obviously have been realistic so far - that's btw what both France and England would have needed. It'll be all the same a big deal for Paraguay to hold on in the knockout stage

Smowz wrote:
Anyway I will put my crystal ball away, today I am supporting Slovakia, Portugal and Brazil and hopefully some more goals and attacking play.


Portugal and especially Brazil will make it in a stunning way for our eyes. Would bet on Brazil 5-0 North Korea and on Portugal 3-2 Ivory Coast. Cannot help me waiting for!

issoiso wrote:
Ribéry in the center? Best way to lose a game if ever there was one.


Ribéry was to be the playmaker for a couple of years. Okay it's hard to take after Zidane and play as Zidane did. Also reckon that Ribéry is rather used to playing on the wing though. Anyway it's time for him to take his responsabilities and manage France as they should.
Edited by Whatsup on 15-06-2010 11:48
We are condemned to be free
 
issoisso
So...battle of the overrated teams.

Ivory Coast vs. Portugal

Which of the two is most overrated? Stick around to find out

issoiso wrote:
Ribéry in the center? Best way to lose a game if ever there was one.


Ribéry was to be the playmaker for a couple of years. Okay it's hard to take after Zidane and play as Zidane did. Also reckon that Ribéry is rather used to playing on the wing though. Anyway it's time for him to take his responsabilities and manage France as they should.[/quote]

That's like saying that Buffon has to be Italy's playmaker because he's their best player.

A playmaker is the guy who has the characteristics for it. Ribéry doesn't. He has the characteristics to be a wing forward and a damn good one. Use him as a playmaker and your team will die a horrible death.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Whatsup
issoisso wrote:
That's like saying that Buffon has to be Italy's playmaker because he's their best player.

A playmaker is the guy who has the characteristics for it. Ribéry doesn't. He has the characteristics to be a wing forward and a damn good one. Use him as a playmaker and your team will die a horrible death.


Who would you see then?? Gignac may come on to me.

Gourcuff and Govou have been making France die; hence any substitutions will be welcomed as long as they are sent offff Grin
Edited by Whatsup on 15-06-2010 12:17
We are condemned to be free
 
Juan
issoisso wrote:
A playmaker is the guy who has the characteristics for it. Ribéry doesn't. He has the characteristics to be a wing forward and a damn good one. Use him as a playmaker and your team will die a horrible death.

I was thinking the same way.
Van Gaal wanted a playmaker at Bayern at the start of the season, and he said Ribéry was to be that man. And then he discovered that it wasn't the place where Ribéry should play, and that playing with Van Bommel and Schweinsteiger as midfielders was enough.
And I also think Ribéry would play really better on the right side, because he can use his speed there way better than on the left side, where he keeps dribbling, while he could center (the problem being we have no strikers who can score with the head).
heberger-image.fr/data/images/58302_Signature.png
 
issoisso
Whatsup wrote:
[quote]issoisso wrote:
Gourcuff and Govou have been making France die; hence any substitutions will be welcomed as long as they are sent offff Grin


France have several problems:

1. Anelka holds on to the ball for far too long and keeps trying to dribble past his markers. Which is stupid when he's got 2 or 3 on him. He may get past one, but getting past the others isn't gonna happen.


2. Ribéry was the worst player on the field against Uruguay. He looked disinterested (just as Malouda accused him of being) and in the few occasions where he actually tried, his runs were always to the byline and his crossing was awful.

3. Govou's movement was very good, as it always is, but when he had the ball he was inconsequential.


France will do a lot better against Mexico than against Uruguay's system, as there will be more space to exploit.

Yes, Gourcuff didn't do much, but he had no space to do anything with. If he plays this poorly against Mexico where he will have more space, by all means drop him. But not based on the Uruguay game.

For once, Domenech got his tactics not completely wrong (a rarity!) but there's a motivation issue there. Players hate each other and hate the coach and are publicly criticising each other.

Without motivation and stability, they're not going anywhere. France at a very big risk of imploding
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Juan
issoisso wrote:
Whatsup wrote:
[quote]issoisso wrote:
Gourcuff and Govou have been making France die; hence any substitutions will be welcomed as long as they are sent offff Grin


France have several problems:

1. Anelka holds on to the ball for far too long and keeps trying to dribble past his markers. Which is stupid when he's got 2 or 3 on him. He may get past one, but getting past the others isn't gonna happen.


2. Ribéry was the worst player on the field against Uruguay. He looked disinterested (just as Malouda accused him of being) and in the few occasions where he actually tried, his runs were always to the byline and his crossing was awful.

3. Govou's movement was very good, as it always is, but when he had the ball he was inconsequential.


France will do a lot better against Mexico than against Uruguay's system, as there will be more space to exploit.

Yes, Gourcuff didn't do much, but he had no space to do anything with. If he plays this poorly against Mexico where he will have more space, by all means drop him. But not based on the Uruguay game.

For once, Domenech got his tactics not completely wrong (a rarity!) but there's a motivation issue there. Players hate each other and hate the coach and are publicly criticising each other.

Without motivation and stability, they're not going anywhere. France at a very big risk of imploding

Everything'll change after the WC with Blanc (at least I very much hope so).
heberger-image.fr/data/images/58302_Signature.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Definition of beautiful
Definition of beautiful
PCM11: Beautiful Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.59 seconds