PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 01:16
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 73

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,797
· Newest Member: Awttthoff
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2015
 Print Thread
PCMdaily DB Stat Discussion - PCM15
Omloop
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
 
Croatia14
75alex wrote:
He is 21 and he just beat Greipel on the Tour Of Britain so it might be justified but I don't know him otherwise


Greipel did a leadout for Dubusschere and when he lost his wheel he had to sprint after having that effort. Gaviria is by far not as good as Greipel, even at this ToB...
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2019/moty.png
 
Arberg27
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.
 
Paul23
Arberg27 wrote:
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.

:lol:
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Unclemax
Arberg27 wrote:
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.


Thus, in your opinion, Van Avermaet should have better cobble statistics than Cancellara and Boonen, just because he's performed better than them in 2015?
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 01:16
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
brojuve27
What about chaves and dumoulin i think they deserve better recovery and landa should have better acceleration
 
Tafiolmo
Of the main riders who've ridden the Vuelta and after taking into consideration Tour de France fatigue this is what I'm going with:

Mtn stat first and TT second.

Nairo Quintana 83 73
Fabio Aru 81 72
Mikel Landa 81 65
Alejandro Valverde 81 74
Rafal Majka 80 72
Joaquim Rodriguez 79/80 66 (Superior hill stat increases his mtn ability)
Tom Dumoulin 78 80
Esteban Chaves 78 70
Mikel Nieve 77 64
Daniel Moreno 77 66
 
Ollfardh
I'd say that's about right!
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Ian Butler
Unclemax wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.


Thus, in your opinion, Van Avermaet should have better cobble statistics than Cancellara and Boonen, just because he's performed better than them in 2015?


Your point is 100% true. So my comment is not related to that:

But yes, I think GVA might deserve better cobbles than Canc and Boonen. Pfft Though this is just my personal opinion, I think Greg is now in his top years and the two oldies aren't that good anymore.
Though Boonen is free to prove me wrong and take a 4th Ronde Van Vlaanderen next season Smile
 
Tafiolmo
Ollfardh wrote:
I'd say that's about right!


The only issue I've got is with Purito as he's been worsening in his mtn stat gradually and after the tour despite winning a stage he was a good 79, but has ridden inspired at times here. Thinking that 79 is still good for him because of his great hill stat, but an increase upto 80 wouldn't be bad either.
 
Tafiolmo
Ian Butler wrote:
Unclemax wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.


Thus, in your opinion, Van Avermaet should have better cobble statistics than Cancellara and Boonen, just because he's performed better than them in 2015?


Your point is 100% true. So my comment is not related to that:

But yes, I think GVA might deserve better cobbles than Canc and Boonen. Pfft Though this is just my personal opinion, I think Greg is now in his top years and the two oldies aren't that good anymore.
Though Boonen is free to prove me wrong and take a 4th Ronde Van Vlaanderen next season Smile


In game GVA has a higher cobble stat than Boonen anyway largely because Boonen has been pretty inactive over the last few years, GVA is without doubt a great 81 cobble man despite the fact he never wins anything on cobbles. In fact in game (my game) he never wins any of the big cobble races so that's pretty realistic and wastes a lot of energy putting in silly attacks too early.
 
Arberg27
Unclemax wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.


Thus, in your opinion, Van Avermaet should have better cobble statistics than Cancellara and Boonen, just because he's performed better than them in 2015?

Cancellara? No, the same reason as Kittel.
Boonen? Yes, the same reason as Cavendish.
Edited by Arberg27 on 13-09-2015 07:59
 
ItalianBlack
I think that Omar Fraile need a upgrade in Hill , Mountain and his fighter stats and Fernando Gaviria in his Sprint .
 
Onurb19
ItalianBlack wrote:
I think that Omar Fraile need a upgrade in Hill , Mountain and his fighter stats and Fernando Gaviria in his Sprint .

And Gonçalves & Oliveira need a upgrade..
 
Tafiolmo
Onurb19 wrote:
ItalianBlack wrote:
I think that Omar Fraile need a upgrade in Hill , Mountain and his fighter stats and Fernando Gaviria in his Sprint .

And Gonçalves & Oliveira need a upgrade..


Yes the mountain and fighting stats of those two riders are really bad.

I'm also interested in what stat improvements Ewan and Gaviria are going to get as well.
 
Paul23
Arberg27 wrote:
Unclemax wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Omloop wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Name - Sprint stats - ACC stats

Marcel Kittel 83 82
Andre Greipel 83 80
Peter Sagan 81 81
Mark Cavendish 81 81
Alexander Kristoff 80 80
Nacer Bouhanni 80 79
John Degenkolb 80 79
Elia Viviani 79 79
Bryan Coquard 78 80
Andrea Guardini 78 79
Arnaud Demare 78 79

You can't be serious? Sagan as fast as Cavendish and faster than Kristoff?
Yes it is a 2015 DB, not 2011. Sagan was the fastest in the tour after Greipel. Cavendish has not been better in three years now.


Thus, in your opinion, Van Avermaet should have better cobble statistics than Cancellara and Boonen, just because he's performed better than them in 2015?

Cancellara? No, the same reason as Kittel.
Boonen? Yes, the same reason as Cavendish.

I can just repeat myself here:

:lol:
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Ollfardh
Most of us know by now not to take Arberg seriously Wink
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Paul23
Ollfardh wrote:
Most of us know by now not to take Arberg seriously Wink

I know, but I always get so amazed when I see him in action.
i.imgur.com/aJSlUNt.png
 
Tafiolmo
Paul23 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
Most of us know by now not to take Arberg seriously Wink

I know, but I always get so amazed when I see him in action.


Arnberg= Shock Value
 
bob7
Paul23 wrote:
Ollfardh wrote:
Most of us know by now not to take Arberg seriously Wink

I know, but I always get so amazed when I see him in action.


It's sunday. You wake up, check pcmdaily and see Arberg posts. And you know, it's gonna be a good day Grin
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Martijn Maaskant
Martijn Maaskant
PCM 08: General PCM-screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.32 seconds