PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 10:35
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 77

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,800
· Newest Member: Willemverstichel
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Le Tour 09: Stage 11 - Vatan - Saint Fargeau
bobcatsman
Holtz a french commentator who ask Nocentini if he sleeps with his wife during the Tour. Cool
 
pangare
He is good in what he does, he reminds me Cristiano Ronaldo :lol:
 
schleck93
Farrar was equally fast as Cav today, he had to go the loooooong way round Hushovd though. And nice to see Milram trying to bash elbows with Columbia and even succeding at one point, they just started too far out.
BenBarnes wrote:
Thor wears a live rattlesnake as a condom.
 
ringo182
ruben wrote:
The thing that annoys me is, if it was Petacchi, Cipollini in the old days, or even Farrar and Hushovd in these times, who won 4 stages, 2 years in a row, I would be happy to applaud them.

But Cavendish, I feel nothing but solid dislike for the guy. He's just so goddamn arrogant. Get over yourself!


he's not arrogant, he's the best in the world by a country mile and he knows it. whats he gonna do after his 8th tour stage win in 2 years? say "i just got lucky" or "on another day Hushovd would have beaten me" when he knows it's bollocks. he wins because he's the best. he knows it, the interviewer knows it, the viewers know it and his rivals know it. what do you want him to say?

i reckon he's less arrogant then many lesser sprinters around at the moment, Boonen for one, Bennatti for another.
 
Kami
schleck93 wrote:
Farrar was equally fast as Cav today, he had to go the loooooong way round Hushovd though. And nice to see Milram trying to bash elbows with Columbia and even succeding at one point, they just started too far out.


If Farrar was on Hushovd's spot he might have come very close.
Manager of:
Bacardi Limited


pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2010/09_Newmember.png
 
schleck93
ringo182 wrote:
ruben wrote:
The thing that annoys me is, if it was Petacchi, Cipollini in the old days, or even Farrar and Hushovd in these times, who won 4 stages, 2 years in a row, I would be happy to applaud them.

But Cavendish, I feel nothing but solid dislike for the guy. He's just so goddamn arrogant. Get over yourself!


he's not arrogant, he's the best in the world by a country mile and he knows it. whats he gonna do after his 8th tour stage win in 2 years? say "i just got lucky" or "on another day Hushovd would have beaten me" when he knows it's bollocks. he wins because he's the best. he knows it, the interviewer knows it, the viewers know it and his rivals know it. what do you want him to say?

i reckon he's less arrogant then many lesser sprinters around at the moment, Boonen for one, Bennatti for another.


Ruben want a true gentleman like Cipolinni or Pettachi.
BenBarnes wrote:
Thor wears a live rattlesnake as a condom.
 
BenBarnes
ringo182 wrote:
ruben wrote:
The thing that annoys me is, if it was Petacchi, Cipollini in the old days, or even Farrar and Hushovd in these times, who won 4 stages, 2 years in a row, I would be happy to applaud them.

But Cavendish, I feel nothing but solid dislike for the guy. He's just so goddamn arrogant. Get over yourself!


he's not arrogant, he's the best in the world by a country mile and he knows it. whats he gonna do after his 8th tour stage win in 2 years? say "i just got lucky" or "on another day Hushovd would have beaten me" when he knows it's bollocks. he wins because he's the best. he knows it, the interviewer knows it, the viewers know it and his rivals know it. what do you want him to say?

i reckon he's less arrogant then many lesser sprinters around at the moment, Boonen for one, Bennatti for another.


How arrogant was Federer when he was completely dominate for about 2 years though? There's being confident and then there's being arrogant. Cav falls in the latter.
 
KurtinSC
BenBarnes wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
ruben wrote:
The thing that annoys me is, if it was Petacchi, Cipollini in the old days, or even Farrar and Hushovd in these times, who won 4 stages, 2 years in a row, I would be happy to applaud them.

But Cavendish, I feel nothing but solid dislike for the guy. He's just so goddamn arrogant. Get over yourself!


he's not arrogant, he's the best in the world by a country mile and he knows it. whats he gonna do after his 8th tour stage win in 2 years? say "i just got lucky" or "on another day Hushovd would have beaten me" when he knows it's bollocks. he wins because he's the best. he knows it, the interviewer knows it, the viewers know it and his rivals know it. what do you want him to say?

i reckon he's less arrogant then many lesser sprinters around at the moment, Boonen for one, Bennatti for another.


How arrogant was Federer when he was completely dominate for about 2 years though? There's being confident and then there's being arrogant. Cav falls in the latter.


Or you could say there's being confident and then there's being boring... and Federer falls in the latter.

All perception I guess. For me, Cav strikes me as a young guy who's fairly unassuming... but quick to react with unwise statements if annoyed.

I've seen a lot of interviews where he comes across quite unassuming... but in general if they get him right after the race while his adrenaline is going he'll say something that could be considered arrogant.

I personally HATE interviews with atheletes right after the game. It's the absolute WORST type of interview you can get. Seeing swimmers trying to catch their breath after an olympic race having to give an interview or a football player walking off the field after a game... that's when you get stupid statements. It's not because that's how they are... it's because they are still in "game mode".

I see that a lot with Cav. Post race interviews while he's still on his bike... sounds arrogant. Interviews an hour or two after the fact... seems pretty grounded.
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 10:35
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
ringo182
KurtinSC wrote:


Or you could say there's being confident and then there's being boring... and Federer falls in the latter.

All perception I guess. For me, Cav strikes me as a young guy who's fairly unassuming... but quick to react with unwise statements if annoyed.

I've seen a lot of interviews where he comes across quite unassuming... but in general if they get him right after the race while his adrenaline is going he'll say something that could be considered arrogant.

I personally HATE interviews with atheletes right after the game. It's the absolute WORST type of interview you can get. Seeing swimmers trying to catch their breath after an olympic race having to give an interview or a football player walking off the field after a game... that's when you get stupid statements. It's not because that's how they are... it's because they are still in "game mode".

I see that a lot with Cav. Post race interviews while he's still on his bike... sounds arrogant. Interviews an hour or two after the fact... seems pretty grounded.


agreed 100%
 
CrueTrue
I tend to base my views on what people around someone says. In this case, I remember an interview with Brian Holm where he was asked about Cavendish. Although I wouldn't expect him to say that he hates the guy if he was asked by a journalist and really didn't like him, what he said showed that he meant it.

He said that of all people, Cavendish was the one who was the most thoughtful. For no reason at all, he would call up someone from the team and ask how they were doing - more than anyone, he cares for the people around him and is deeply grateful for all his friends, Holm said.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Dezzy
The columbia train is seemingly unbeatable, no others can do it aswell as they can, reminds me of the Pettachi days. As soon as I saw that it was a slight rise to the finish I thought Boonen, maybe Hushovd but Hushy didn't have anything in the tank and Boonen wasn't even in the top 10!

I had to LOL at Cavendish after the stage:
Interviewer: Some people said that because of the slight uphill into the finish you couldn't win today.

Cav: Who said that? Foreigners?

Typical of adrenaline flowing though his veins, the red mist clouding his thoughts.
 
doddy13
Dezzy wrote:
The columbia train is seemingly unbeatable, no others can do it aswell as they can, reminds me of the Pettachi days. As soon as I saw that it was a slight rise to the finish I thought Boonen, maybe Hushovd but Hushy didn't have anything in the tank and Boonen wasn't even in the top 10!

I had to LOL at Cavendish after the stage:
Interviewer: Some people said that because of the slight uphill into the finish you couldn't win today.

Cav: Who said that? Foreigners?

Typical of adrenaline flowing though his veins, the red mist clouding his thoughts.

are you the guy i corrected on 606?
Because he said forum users, not foreigners.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
BenBarnes
KurtinSC wrote:
BenBarnes wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
ruben wrote:
The thing that annoys me is, if it was Petacchi, Cipollini in the old days, or even Farrar and Hushovd in these times, who won 4 stages, 2 years in a row, I would be happy to applaud them.

But Cavendish, I feel nothing but solid dislike for the guy. He's just so goddamn arrogant. Get over yourself!


he's not arrogant, he's the best in the world by a country mile and he knows it. whats he gonna do after his 8th tour stage win in 2 years? say "i just got lucky" or "on another day Hushovd would have beaten me" when he knows it's bollocks. he wins because he's the best. he knows it, the interviewer knows it, the viewers know it and his rivals know it. what do you want him to say?

i reckon he's less arrogant then many lesser sprinters around at the moment, Boonen for one, Bennatti for another.


How arrogant was Federer when he was completely dominate for about 2 years though? There's being confident and then there's being arrogant. Cav falls in the latter.


Or you could say there's being confident and then there's being boring... and Federer falls in the latter.

All perception I guess. For me, Cav strikes me as a young guy who's fairly unassuming... but quick to react with unwise statements if annoyed.

I've seen a lot of interviews where he comes across quite unassuming... but in general if they get him right after the race while his adrenaline is going he'll say something that could be considered arrogant.

I personally HATE interviews with atheletes right after the game. It's the absolute WORST type of interview you can get. Seeing swimmers trying to catch their breath after an olympic race having to give an interview or a football player walking off the field after a game... that's when you get stupid statements. It's not because that's how they are... it's because they are still in "game mode".

I see that a lot with Cav. Post race interviews while he's still on his bike... sounds arrogant. Interviews an hour or two after the fact... seems pretty grounded.


No, I see where you're coming from, but even in the heat of competition there's ways to do it in a professional manner or not. Cav coming up with different celebrations each stage alone is a sign of a certain arrogance if you ask me. Armstrong in several interviews seems very gracious and claims he is just hoping for the best. Does anyone believe he's not arrogant?
 
SportingNonsense
Great sprint from Cavendish - and Farrar, Hutarovich and Freire too. The first real time in the tour that Farrar showed he is capable of winning, and it would be nice if he could manage to grab a win at some point (although hard), just so long as Cavendish still beats Hushovd Pfft
 
ringo182
who was the last person before cav to win 4 stages in 1 tour? and how about 5 or 6 stages?
 
issoisso
Cipollini was the last sprinter to win 4 stages (consecutive, no less. And he quit on stage 10 as they went into the mountains)

But all respect to Cavendish, Cipollini was going up against the best crop of sprinters a Tour's ever seen, by quite a margin.

While Cavendish is up against Hushovd and a bunch of injured (Freire, Bennati) or out of shape (Boonen) guys who aren't on the same level as Cipollini's rivals Svorada, Steels, Zabel, Kirsipuu, Minali, O'Grady (before he stopped training as a sprinter and lost his sprinting speed) and McEwen.

As for more than 4, I remember Merckx won 6 stages in 69. That's all I can think of, really.
Edited by issoisso on 15-07-2009 21:16
 
stuartmcstuart
issoisso wrote:
Cipollini was the last sprinter to win 4 stages (consecutive, no less. And he quit on stage 10 as they went into the mountains)

But all respect to Cavendish, Cipollini was going up against the best crop of sprinters a Tour's ever seen, by quite a margin.

While Cavendish is up against Hushovd and a bunch of injured (Freire, Bennati) or out of shape (Boonen) guys who aren't on the same level as Cipollini's rivals Svorada, Steels, Zabel, Kirsipuu, Minali, O'Grady (before he stopped training as a sprinter and lost his sprinting speed) and McEwen.


This is true, but you can only beat what's in front of you. Cav still deserves some kudos for his sprint domination.
Edited by stuartmcstuart on 15-07-2009 21:16
 
issoisso
stuartmcstuart wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Cipollini was the last sprinter to win 4 stages (consecutive, no less. And he quit on stage 10 as they went into the mountains)

But all respect to Cavendish, Cipollini was going up against the best crop of sprinters a Tour's ever seen, by quite a margin.

While Cavendish is up against Hushovd and a bunch of injured (Freire, Bennati) or out of shape (Boonen) guys who aren't on the same level as Cipollini's rivals Svorada, Steels, Zabel, Kirsipuu, Minali, O'Grady (before he stopped training as a sprinter and lost his sprinting speed) and McEwen.


This is true, but you can only beat whats in front of you. Cav still deserves some kudos for his sprint domination.


"some"? He deserves an enormous amount. Just can't compare to Cipollini's achievement, that's all.

Also, cycling's never seen a train like Columbia's. When was the lsat time a train always left a sprinter up front? never, that's when. The best trains were those of Petacchi and Cipollini and they had about a 50% fail rate.

But that's to do with the current sprinters not having the guts of previous ones. We need a new generation quick, the current ones suck in terms of courage. That's why they lose.

No one tries to anticipate the sprint. it's stupid. I've never seen anything like it.
Edited by issoisso on 15-07-2009 21:20
 
Guido Mukk
still I think Cavendish have a to good year on the run..hard to repeat.
I have watched many races from past..this 2009 Columbia train is realy something..
 
schleck93
didn't Petacchi win 4 stages in 2004 (maybe 05)? From what I remember his train was beyond rivals in that tour, and Petacchi was faster than his rivals, just like Cavendish and columbia this year.
BenBarnes wrote:
Thor wears a live rattlesnake as a condom.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Open landscape
Open landscape
PCM 08: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.38 seconds