|
Davide Rebellin caught on CERA at Olympics (?)
|
| ruben |
Posted on 29-04-2009 13:36
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7125
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
2nd cyclist = Stefan Schumacher
No suprise there. |
| |
|
|
| Xavier |
Posted on 29-04-2009 13:49
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 924
Joined: 21-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
 what an idiot(schumacher) |
| |
|
|
| doddy13 |
Posted on 29-04-2009 13:50
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7104
Joined: 04-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
but at least it was already "known" as the cyclingnews report said, it's safe to assume that if a rider got away with it at the tour, they will get away at the Olympics. There was only 2 weeks between them.
How wrong they were.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 29-04-2009 13:55
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 27880
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I wonder if Schumacher will keep on denying it. I guess he will, but I mean .. 3 positive tests, two during the Tour, one during the Olympics. |
| |
|
|
| doddy13 |
Posted on 29-04-2009 14:19
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7104
Joined: 04-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
I wonder if Schumacher will keep on denying it. I guess he will, but I mean .. 3 positive tests, two during the Tour, one during the Olympics.
it's hardly coincidence really is it?
it must be impossible to deny now. But i bet he still trys. Quickly make a daily bet "Will Schumacher deny doping again"
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
|
| |
|
|
| Thrige |
Posted on 29-04-2009 14:29
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 788
Joined: 17-11-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
doddy13 wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
I wonder if Schumacher will keep on denying it. I guess he will, but I mean .. 3 positive tests, two during the Tour, one during the Olympics.
it's hardly coincidence really is it?
it must be impossible to deny now. But i bet he still trys. Quickly make a daily bet "Will Schumacher deny doping again"
The odds gonna be 1,01, or what? |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 08-12-2025 04:57
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Rin |
Posted on 29-04-2009 14:30
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2582
Joined: 14-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
doddy13 wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
I wonder if Schumacher will keep on denying it. I guess he will, but I mean .. 3 positive tests, two during the Tour, one during the Olympics.
it's hardly coincidence really is it?
it must be impossible to deny now. But i bet he still trys. Quickly make a daily bet "Will Schumacher deny doping again"
When you bet 1000 dollar for it I think you will win 1000 dollar 
It´s just stupid with him 
 Team Bianchi - 2012 Man-Game ProContinental Tour Champions
 |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 29-04-2009 14:49
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7125
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
This puts the 1-2 of Gerolsteiner in the AGR 2007 in a whole new light.
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 29-04-2009 14:51
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 19134
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ruben wrote:
This puts the 1-2 of Gerolsteiner in the AGR 2007 in a whole new light.
I'm more interested in the sudden downward slopes of Fothen's and Wegmann's performances the past year and a half... |
| |
|
|
| Lefsa |
Posted on 29-04-2009 15:29
|
Under 23
Posts: 75
Joined: 02-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
I'm more interested in the sudden downward slopes of Fothen's and Wegmann's performances the past year and a half...
And how suddenly Haussler, became so much better?
It's wrong to compare that. They would probably be caught if they have been doped. Thats called shape.
Edited by Lefsa on 29-04-2009 15:29
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 29-04-2009 16:10
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 19134
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
I wonder if Schumacher will keep on denying it. I guess he will, but I mean .. 3 positive tests, two during the Tour, one during the Olympics.
4. He's the guy who had 2 positives during the olympics |
| |
|
|
| Blues Brother |
Posted on 29-04-2009 16:12
|
Under 23
Posts: 85
Joined: 29-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well, not a great surprise: the German Cycling Union (or what ever it is named) is now reporting that a new cyclist is taken for doping. And yes: it is Stefan Schumacher!
https://www.rad-net.de/index.php?newsi...wsid=17270
|
| |
|
|
| Ste117 |
Posted on 29-04-2009 16:13
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3533
Joined: 21-02-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Hopefully Rebellin gets a 2 year ban n his career is over and as for Schumacher thats twice now he needs banning for life the german scum. |
| |
|
|
| Guido Mukk |
Posted on 29-04-2009 16:46
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15176
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Schumacher..amen. |
| |
|
|
| Rinhoth |
Posted on 29-04-2009 16:47
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 282
Joined: 11-04-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well, couldn't have hoped for anyone better as the second cyclist than Schumacher for the sake of the sport.
If children have the ability to ignore all odds and percentages, then maybe we can all learn from them. When you think about it, what other choice is there but to hope? We have two options, medically and emotionally: give up, or Fight Like Hell.
-Lance Armstrong
 |
| |
|
|
| Blues Brother |
Posted on 29-04-2009 16:49
|
Under 23
Posts: 85
Joined: 29-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Amen Rinhoth! It was good to hear that Schumacher are the second rider. We don't need anymore scandals now.
|
| |
|
|
| wackojackohighcliffe |
Posted on 29-04-2009 17:23
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7366
Joined: 19-02-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
rebellin denies https://www.cyclingweekly.co.uk/news/R...81616.html
|
| |
|
|
| alexkr00 |
Posted on 29-04-2009 17:36
|
World Champion
Posts: 13561
Joined: 05-08-2008
PCM$: 400.00
|
that doesn't surprise me a lot.
|
| |
|
|
| knasen |
Posted on 29-04-2009 17:47
|
Domestique
Posts: 411
Joined: 28-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
What has he to loss with denying? A big WHAT IF now, but the B sample is negative. Everything goes back to normal and he remains on of the best classic riders ever. If its positive he retires. |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 29-04-2009 17:50
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 19134
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
knasen wrote:
A big WHAT IF now, but the B sample is negative
A HUGE "what if". There's very literally a much much larger chance of me winning the lottery 3 weeks in a row than there is of a B sample being negative when the A sample was positive. |
| |
|
