PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 22:14
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 78

· Members Online: 1
Ollfardh

· Total Members: 161,803
· Newest Member: actronspareparts
View Thread
PCM.daily » PCM Stories & Story Games » Story Games
 Print Thread
TOTC 3: Pre Race Discussion Thread
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 22:14
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Shonak
But it's not about the 20/21st person in the list, it's about the guys in the middle, let's say 7-13. That's 6 people of 20 participants at the core of things, but you can extend it to 8, 10 or even 12. They are always at a disadvantage, in every draft. It's not fair to them to always make comprises while the Top 3/Bottom 3 can each say in 4 of the 8 drafts: Hey, I take that one, and that one, and that one, and one of them belongs to me.

Yes, the riders are not overpowered, and it can be that even the 15th gets his first rider. The one he would choose if he was Number One.

I understand the draft system and I think it works the best for this kind of game and I appreciate the strategy that one has to decide upon picking his riders, however there's room to optimize. In reality it's pretty simple. The table above shows the principle system and each time the ranking in the group itself can change additionaly. An Example: This means that the original 5th listed person in Group 2 for example can get their favourited rider in Pot 5 without any worries and the 4th listed can try for two of his favourited listed riders and the third, well he will in this instant get both times one of the 3 preferred riders, when Group 2 is atop. Geez, that makes it sound way more complicated, but you get the idea? The principle of choosing riders would stay the same throughout the draft, but it's just more equal towards everybody.
Edited by Shonak on 02-12-2013 22:32
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
TheManxMissile
Done some maths, even got out Excel and a Calculator for this (although the Calculator wasn't really needed)

So we've got 4 Groups of 5 People. For the purpose of explanation Group 1 is G1 etc. and Person 1 in Group 1 is 1A, Person 1 in Group 2 is 2A etc. Rounds are shortened to R#

R1 goes G1 G2 G3 G4. In more detail it goes 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E.
R2 = 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E
R3 = 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 1A1 1B 1C 1D 1E 2A 1B 1C 1D 1E
R4 = 2A 2B 2C 2D 2E 1A 1B 1C 1D 1E 4A 4B 4C 4D 4E 3A 3B 3C 3D 3E
R5-8 is just in reverse so no need to detail it.

So i picked out 4 People at random, 1A 2C 3E 4B, to do the more specific math.
1A = 68
2C = 86
3E = 100
4B = 76
Clearly visible i think. The middle men, 2C and 3E are the two highest values, whilst the outer men, 1A and 4B are the lowest values. In this system the middle men have lost out compared to the outer men. In addition each person has a unique value creating imbalance between everyone involved in the system. There are clearly defined winners and losers. This is partly due the Group ordering, which is not a true serpentine
I havn't done the maths on the opposite people, 4A 3C 2E 1B, but i know the values will not be equal and that the middle men will be worse off.

Also i did this without including Group specific serpentining. I can do that if you like but i reckon that there will still be unequal totals floating around, although i can't know until i do the math. What i can say is that including this extra level of serpentine is going to be excessive when compared to a basic 1-21 serpentine we are currently using.
If the in-Group serpentine is included, and it leads to all equal values for each person, then yes the system works as fairly as a standard serpentine. And yes it would give more people chance of "1st pick". Except it isn't "1st pick" anymore, it's "21st" then "41st" and so on. Of course with set Pots for each round it is still 1st pick because that resets because of a totally new set of riders.

Basically the system can work (i would need to do the in-group serpentine numbers to know for certain) as long as there are no more than 20 people and 8 rounds and a totally new set of riders each round. Very specific set up which offers very slight mental benefits to a couple more people, but does not change anything overall
i.imgur.com/UmX5YX1.jpgi.imgur.com/iRneKpI.jpgi.imgur.com/fljmGSP.jpgi.imgur.com/qV5ItIc.jpgimgur.com/dr2BAI6.jpgimgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpgi.imgur.com/C1rG9BW.jpgi.imgur.com/sEDS7gr.jpg
 
Shonak
Thanks for the effort and explanation, ManxMissile. You certainly know your math. Grin I do wonder though what you have taken into the calcutation excatly? Only the draft order as a serpentine system, or also the 3 choices each one has, what value is applied to them?

The way I see it the guys 2C and 3E lose out because there has been no group specific serpenting. 1A and 4B have therefor of course lower values, because without group specific serpenting A and B will always come ahead of C and E, thus they get higher values in comparions each time. I imagine with group serpenting applied, there will still be some unequality left but I suppose we can (wrongly?) just account the factor of randomness to it. Of course "complete" serpenting won't cause perfect equality, since Pot 1 will always belong first to the guys in Group 1 but The Rider has already shown that he has balanced 9 Pots quite nicely, where in Pot 2 potential leaders are to be found & picked, and so on. It'd be interesting to know how the current serpenting holds up against the "complete" serpenting system in terms of equality but you don't have to calcucate it such for me - only if you want to^^

I am not saying that the system I recommend is 100% equal, after all what is in this life? But it would be more equal towards everybody I think.
Be it as it may: The bit of additional effort may not hold up to its mathematical gain, however on a sociological level it is an improval in my eyes. After all, the original claim still stands: In the current serpentine system Top 3 & Bottom 3 can pick their 3 preferred riders without "fear of losing out" in 4 out of 8 drafts, while the guys in the middle - let's say 9, 10 & 11 - will always have to take in sacrifices in their choice of 3 riders. At least with a Group serpenting system combined with an individual serpenting within in the groups, each person will have at least once the 100% chance of getting one of their 3 preferred riders out of their pot.

Well, anyway, TOTC3 is about to start and I look massively forward to it. I suppose we will have enough time to discuss details when TOTC4 kicks off. Grin
Edited by Shonak on 03-12-2013 00:40
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
The Hobbit
Hmm, we'll, all I have to say is:
NOBODY CARES, well obviously you do, but other than that...
It's only a game guys, don't worry about it, to be fair I don't like either system. There is NO way to do it so everyone will be happy, just enjoy it while you can, the more we moan the later it will be.
 
Ollfardh
Hope to get my draft in later today!
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
Shonak
The Hobbit wrote:
Hmm, we'll, all I have to say is:
NOBODY CARES, well obviously you do, but other than that...
It's only a game guys, don't worry about it, to be fair I don't like either system. There is NO way to do it so everyone will be happy, just enjoy it while you can, the more we moan the later it will be.


I don't moan, I simply discuss the existing serpenting system as it is. Isn't that what discussion boards are for - to discuss things? Plus, it doesn't hold up TOTC3 since the system for this edition will not change. Smile
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Ollfardh
Actually, I still have a question. Will the nationality bonus be Italian for the entire race or will the different stages each have their own nationality bonus?
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
The Rider
Ollfardh wrote:
Actually, I still have a question. Will the nationality bonus be Italian for the entire race or will the different stages each have their own nationality bonus?


Hope this helps. I looked to the way GT's were already implemented into the database. In the STAGE field where each individual stage is managed, for the Denmark stages which were in the 2012 Giro the country field still said Italy rather than Denmark. I have copied this format.

So I believe the game will believe all the stages are in Italy, but not 100% sure by any means. Wink

I've put all of the jerseys into the game so I am now waiting for less than 10 different people's draft lists to come in. *** in POST 2 next to your jersey means you have successfully sent me your choices. Wink
Edited by The Rider on 03-12-2013 12:51
 
Ollfardh
That's mine done! When is the deadline and when can we expect the draft?
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
The Rider
Ollfardh wrote:
That's mine done! When is the deadline and when can we expect the draft?


It was likely take place tomorrow evening at around 6-7 GMT. Of course only if the remaining guys have sent in their lists (See Post 2). I have messaged the remaining guys and I will set a deadline tomorrow morning if necessary. Wink
 
Jesleyh
Sent them in as well now Wink

Damn, I'd never expect that I could be so happy with having first pick in Round 9.
And that has a reason, you'll find out soon(easy to guess, but whatever Pfft)
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
The Rider
Jesleyh wrote:
Sent them in as well now Wink

Damn, I'd never expect that I could be so happy with having first pick in Round 9.
And that has a reason, you'll find out soon(easy to guess, but whatever Pfft)


I hope soon. Only about 7 draft lists are needed now. If they are not in soon we might have to get some bounty hunters to track 'em down. Wink
 
Jesleyh
Well, you'll find out in Stage 1 to be exact Pfft
i1326.photobucket.com/albums/u660/jesleyh/Junk/0ca5fb14-ed59-44b1-8eb0-596097ba5c01_zps8e97f370.jpg

Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy


PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
 
The Hobbit
Shonak wrote:
The Hobbit wrote:
Hmm, we'll, all I have to say is:
NOBODY CARES, well obviously you do, but other than that...
It's only a game guys, don't worry about it, to be fair I don't like either system. There is NO way to do it so everyone will be happy, just enjoy it while you can, the more we moan the later it will be.


I don't moan, I simply discuss the existing serpenting system as it is. Isn't that what discussion boards are for - to discuss things? Plus, it doesn't hold up TOTC3 since the system for this edition will not change. Smile


Well, I wasn't talking to you, or anyone in particular, just generally, sorry, bit immature of me.
 
knockout
Jesleyh wrote:
Well, you'll find out in Stage 1 to be exact Pfft


I thought so. I could have wanted him, too. But being that far down it is not so clever for me to go for it
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters!

pcmdaily.com/images/awards/2015/Manteam.pngpcmdaily.com/images/mg/Awards2020/mgmanager.png
 
The Rider
www.chestees.com/uploads/products/youve-been-warned-2.jpg


Right I am issuing an ultimatum. The remaining four guys have until This Thursday @ 15:00 GMT to send me their rider lists. If they are not sent by this time then all 27 of their picks will be randomly chosen.

Hopefully we can get them all in by tomorrow dinner time though! :
 
Ollfardh
Can they be randomly assigned after the people who did send in draft lists? Last time it was a bit annoying in the rounds where I got last that a few people got random picks I was after.
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
 
jaxika
Ollfardh wrote:
Can they be randomly assigned after the people who did send in draft lists? Last time it was a bit annoying in the rounds where I got last that a few people got random picks I was after.

+1
 
Shonak
+1, seems like a good suggestion by Ollfardh.
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
The Rider
Ollfardh wrote:
Can they be randomly assigned after the people who did send in draft lists? Last time it was a bit annoying in the rounds where I got last that a few people got random picks I was after.


Sure.

Only three more lists needed, c'mon guys! Wink
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Enviroment
Enviroment
PCM10: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.40 seconds