|
Expansion Pack: Stat Discussion
|
| Spilak23 |
Posted on 17-03-2013 17:05
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 22-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
fernando97 wrote:
What are Ciolek's realistic stats after that?  Maybe a HI, STA upgrade?
I think Alakagom has seen San Remo aswell. 
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-11-2024 17:43
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 17-03-2013 17:05
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
85 hill and sprint. Clearly.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| fernando97 |
Posted on 17-03-2013 17:08
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2167
Joined: 01-01-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Spilak23 wrote:
fernando97 wrote:
What are Ciolek's realistic stats after that? Maybe a HI, STA upgrade?
I think Alakagom has seen San Remo aswell.
It's not about that, just wanted to ask this, as I'd like to adjust my DB according to what Alakagom says.
Edited by fernando97 on 17-03-2013 17:10
|
| |
|
|
| valverde321 |
Posted on 17-03-2013 17:09
|
World Champion
Posts: 12986
Joined: 20-05-2009
PCM$: 530.00
|
I'd probably give him 77 Sprint and 74 hill (around that anyway)
|
| |
|
|
| cunego59 |
Posted on 17-03-2013 17:18
|
Team Manager
Posts: 6508
Joined: 14-09-2008
PCM$: 1090.00
|
issoisso wrote:
85 hill and sprint. Clearly.
At least.
|
| |
|
|
| maxime86 |
Posted on 17-03-2013 17:31
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2950
Joined: 01-03-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
cunego59 wrote:
issoisso wrote:
85 hill and sprint. Clearly.
At least.
I'd give him a 90 just so that he doesn't dominate too much |
| |
|
|
| AiZaK |
Posted on 17-03-2013 19:46
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1190
Joined: 13-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
More suggestions for future updates:
C. Evans (Hills) now 78/79 -> next 77
I think Cadel Evans in Hills now 79 it´s too much
S. Devolder (Hills) 89/69 -> 70/71
Although the last year he was very bad, I think he deserves a little more in Hills.
For Ciolek, I think Hill maybe fine 74 and Sprint 76/77 |
| |
|
|
| fcancellara |
Posted on 17-03-2013 19:55
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5194
Joined: 18-08-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Colbrelli, who finished 12th today, deserves higher FL, DH and STA stats, IMO.
|
| |
|
|
| valverde321 |
Posted on 17-03-2013 20:00
|
World Champion
Posts: 12986
Joined: 20-05-2009
PCM$: 530.00
|
fcancellara wrote:
Colbrelli, who finished 12th today, deserves higher FL, DH and STA stats, IMO.
Alakagom made a comment in the MSR thread that after looking at his results and updating CSF's stats yesterday he wasn't that surprised by Cobreli's performance, so I think you'll get your wish 
Edit: more along the lines of him almost picking him for his velogames team.
Edited by valverde321 on 17-03-2013 20:02
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 17-03-2013 20:01
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I'd say Ciolek's sprinting is fine. He let Sagan do all the work, then lead out the sprint from three light years away and still only barely won
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| Smal |
Posted on 17-03-2013 20:11
|
Free Agent
Posts: 122
Joined: 06-09-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
I don't remember Stannard's attributes exactly in the db because I updated them myself ages ago, but the things that need upping the most are his stamina and hill attributes. To 77 and 73/74 respectively. I've upped his flat to 77 as well in my db. I'm pretty sure he could ride his bike forever. |
| |
|
|
| Ollfardh |
Posted on 20-03-2013 09:23
|
World Champion
Posts: 14563
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9100.00
|
AiZaK wrote:
More suggestions for future updates:
S. Devolder (Hills) 89/69 -> 70/71
Although the last year he was very bad, I think he deserves a little more in Hills.
Devolder is badly underrated in this database. Can't see why people like Schleck or Hushovd keep their high stats after a few bad seasons and Devolder seems to decline like a 45 year old
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
| |
|
|
| TTspecialist |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:16
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 796
Joined: 17-02-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Definetely +2 or +3 for Durasek in MO/HIL ,he was in group 'till 400m to the end,or something . |
| |
|
|
| TTspecialist |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:18
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 796
Joined: 17-02-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Same for Stetina. |
| |
|
|
| ppanther |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:26
|
Domestique
Posts: 482
Joined: 25-12-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
TTspecialist wrote:
Definetely +2 or +3 for Durasek in MO/HIL ,he was in group 'till 400m to the end,or something .
I don't know his stats exactly, but hasn't he already something about 72/71?
+2/3 would make him 74/74 and thats too much in my opinion... |
| |
|
|
| TTspecialist |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:28
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 796
Joined: 17-02-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
ppanther wrote:
TTspecialist wrote:
Definetely +2 or +3 for Durasek in MO/HIL ,he was in group 'till 400m to the end,or something .
I don't know his stats exactly, but hasn't he already something about 72/71?
+2/3 would make him 74/74 and thats too much in my opinion...
72/70, 74/72 would be perfect for him,guy with 72 MO cant stay in group where are top20 climbers... |
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:29
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
But Durasek is not one of the Top20 climbers...
and neither is Stetina
|
| |
|
|
| TTspecialist |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:33
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 796
Joined: 17-02-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
But Durasek is not one of the Top20 climbers...
and neither is Stetina
Exactly,they arent top climbers but they're with them,especially Stetina,74 for Durasek won't make him one of top20 but definetely will make his chances much bigger (as it is irl). |
| |
|
|
| raulvasa_9 |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:42
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 40
Joined: 09-10-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
The progression of Nairo Quintana is awesome. I don´t know if you also change the potential stat, but this rider will win the Tour of France, I´m sure..., unluckily, if alakagom will change the stats before the Giro, he won´t see the podium of Quintana in that race Nevertheless, I hope you´ve seen the stage of Volta, awesome Quintana, and awesome Valverde waiting behind Purito.
I think Quintana deserves an upgrade in MO and Hill (79/77), because he also did a great Paris Niza (bad luck for his fall down at the 4 stage), and Valverde should have the same stats than Purito in MO and hill (when they ride in the same race, they used to finish together). |
| |
|
|
| Smal |
Posted on 20-03-2013 16:45
|
Free Agent
Posts: 122
Joined: 06-09-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
79 mountain would make him much better than Porte and Porte climbed much better than Quintana in Paris-Nice |
| |
|
![imgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpg](https://imgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpg)
