PCM.daily banner
16-02-2025 11:58
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 23

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 162,997
· Newest Member: Trobo
View Thread
PCM.daily » Pro Cycling Manager 2006-2020 » Pro Cycling Manager 2018
 Print Thread
PCM.daily Stat Discussion
quadsas
Why is Tadej Pogacar so godly as a 19 year old? I know you dont put too much stock into progression etc, but that guy is a guaranteed one of TDF favourites even 2 years into the career (3 out of 3 times he reached 80 MO before the end of 2nd season)
 
Arberg
Mountain:

83: Froome
82: Porte, Quintana
81: Bardet, Landa, Nibali
80: Uran, Pinot, Thomas, Dumoulin, Poels
 
AiZaK
Arberg wrote:
Mountain:

83: Froome
82: Porte, Quintana
81: Bardet, Landa, Nibali
80: Uran, Pinot, Thomas, Dumoulin, Poels


You must wait, only 1 stage in Mountains
 
BoraHansgrohe
Gregor Mühlberger deserves more than 68 downhill
 
Tafiolmo
Mühlberger DH has been done.

Now just throwing this out there to get an overall opinion.

Do you guys think that both Thomas and Dumoulin should have the same mtn stat?
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
StevenGreen
Tafiolmo wrote:
Mühlberger DH has been done.

Now just throwing this out there to get an overall opinion.

Do you guys think that both Thomas and Dumoulin should have the same mtn stat?


It's probably too early to tell, though we'll know by the end of the tour I think. Until then I think Dumoulin should be on point better than Thomas, considering that Dumoulin did the Giro.
"He made a bigger comeback than Easter Sunday."



 
marcoplv95
I think from now on, Thomas deserves 80 MO however it ends. If he wins Tour, probably even 81 and good REC. This is not the first time he performs that well, but sure he's being impressive now.
Edited by marcoplv95 on 22-07-2018 01:53
 
Tafiolmo
StevenGreen wrote:
Tafiolmo wrote:
Mühlberger DH has been done.

Now just throwing this out there to get an overall opinion.

Do you guys think that both Thomas and Dumoulin should have the same mtn stat?


It's probably too early to tell, though we'll know by the end of the tour I think. Until then I think Dumoulin should be on point better than Thomas, considering that Dumoulin did the Giro.


Agree it's too early BUT if Thomas goes all the way like finishing 1st or in the top 3 then it will be hard to keep him on 79 and 80 would be justifiable
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
Tafiolmo
marcoplv95 wrote:
I think from now on, Thomas deserves 80 MO however it ends. If he wins Tour, probably even 81 and good REC. This is not the first time he performs that well, but sure he's being impressive now.https://i.imgur.com/vR8EVAA.png


81 either is not impossible but remember like Dumoulin due to his flat and res will feel like a point more anyway
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 16-02-2025 11:58
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
AiZaK
I think Dumoulin deserves 1 point more than G. Thomas
 
StevenGreen
Tafiolmo wrote:
StevenGreen wrote:
Tafiolmo wrote:
Mühlberger DH has been done.

Now just throwing this out there to get an overall opinion.

Do you guys think that both Thomas and Dumoulin should have the same mtn stat?


It's probably too early to tell, though we'll know by the end of the tour I think. Until then I think Dumoulin should be on point better than Thomas, considering that Dumoulin did the Giro.


Agree it's too early BUT if Thomas goes all the way like finishing 1st or in the top 3 then it will be hard to keep him on 79 and 80 would be justifiable


That seems reasonable
"He made a bigger comeback than Easter Sunday."



 
marcoplv95
Tafiolmo wrote:
marcoplv95 wrote:
I think from now on, Thomas deserves 80 MO however it ends. If he wins Tour, probably even 81 and good REC. This is not the first time he performs that well, but sure he's being impressive now.https://i.imgur.com/vR8EVAA.png


81 either is not impossible but remember like Dumoulin due to his flat and res will feel like a point more anyway
True. I actually don't remember how much RES has Thomas. Anyways 80 is already reasonable imho...if he falls maybe we should lower REC
 
Champ_Armstrong
AiZaK wrote:
Arberg wrote:
Mountain:

83: Froome
82: Porte, Quintana
81: Bardet, Landa, Nibali
80: Uran, Pinot, Thomas, Dumoulin, Poels


You must wait, only 1 stage in Mountains


Poels 80? Really?
 
Tafiolmo
Marco they have two of the highest res with Dumoulin a huge 79 and Thomas a high 77,.

Also no way will Poels be 80. He needs to be behind Froome, Thomas and Bernal in mtn stat and will probably stay 79 even though he's looked less this Tour.
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
alex valceanu
My thoughts on GC riders:

Froome 82 MO (he should be clear number 1)
Porte 81 (low on RES and REC)
Bardet 81
Nibali 80/81
Quintana 80 (good REC)
Doumulin 80 (great TT,FL,RES will make him feel better as a GC rider than other 80 MO guys)
Landa/Pinot/G.Thomas 80
Uran 80 (dunno if he deserves downgrage, i personally wouldn't)
S.Yayes 80 (low-ish REC)
Pozzo/Zakarin/Poels/Dan Martin/Roglic/Fuglsang 79


Just my opinion, I still have doubts on Aru,Adam Yates and Majka. At this moment I have them all on 79 MO.
 
Tafiolmo
alex valceanu wrote:
My thoughts on GC riders:

Froome 82 MO (he should be clear number 1)
Porte 81 (low on RES and REC)
Bardet 81
Nibali 80/81
Quintana 80 (good REC)
Doumulin 80 (great TT,FL,RES will make him feel better as a GC rider than other 80 MO guys)
Landa/Pinot/G.Thomas 80
Uran 80 (dunno if he deserves downgrage, i personally wouldn't)
S.Yayes 80 (low-ish REC)
Pozzo/Zakarin/Poels/Dan Martin/Roglic/Fuglsang 79


Just my opinion, I still have doubts on Aru,Adam Yates and Majka. At this moment I have them all on 79 MO.


Some good ideas but not sure why you think Porte should have lower res he's actually a more power/rhythm climber than a punchy one. Porte's big problem is that despite being one of the big favs alaways crashes out so we never get to see his true ability and rec capability have to wait for the Vuelta now hich I hear he's riding.

Quintana is a hard one and clearly not as good as he was some years ago, every year he supposedly has great preparation for the Tour but is disappointing and again everybody will be looking to see how he does in the third week but 80 does look harsh.

Roglic we have no real idea of how good he actually can be, best to judge him after some more mtn stages.


Riders like Thomas and Dumoulin again now better after the final week and much will depend on whether a 83 or 82 mtn matric is used for the top rider/s to see where they fit in

Riders like Majka will all be 78 and 77 mtn.
Edited by Tafiolmo on 22-07-2018 11:47
pcmdaily.com/files/exppack/Banner/DBTeam24.png
 
Jorge14
Bernald should be 79 right? With decent backups i think
Also how do you rate Ivan Sosa?
 
alex valceanu
Tafiolmo wrote:
alex valceanu wrote:
My thoughts on GC riders:

Froome 82 MO (he should be clear number 1)
Porte 81 (low on RES and REC)
Bardet 81
Nibali 80/81
Quintana 80 (good REC)
Doumulin 80 (great TT,FL,RES will make him feel better as a GC rider than other 80 MO guys)
Landa/Pinot/G.Thomas 80
Uran 80 (dunno if he deserves downgrage, i personally wouldn't)
S.Yayes 80 (low-ish REC)
Pozzo/Zakarin/Poels/Dan Martin/Roglic/Fuglsang 79


Just my opinion, I still have doubts on Aru,Adam Yates and Majka. At this moment I have them all on 79 MO.


Some good ideas but not sure why you think Porte should have lower res he's actually a more power/rhythm climber than a punchy one. Porte's big problem is that despite being one of the big favs alaways crashes out so we never get to see his true ability and rec capability have to wait for the Vuelta now hich I hear he's riding.

Quintana is a hard one and clearly not as good as he was some years ago, every year he supposedly has great preparation for the Tour but is disappointing and again everybody will be looking to see how he does in the third week but 80 does look harsh.

Roglic we have no real idea of how good he actually can be, best to judge him after some more mtn stages.


Riders like Thomas and Dumoulin again now better after the final week and much will depend on whether a 83 or 82 mtn matric is used for the top rider/s to see where they fit in

Riders like Majka will all be 78 and 77 mtn.


Yeah, I agree. We will have a better idea after the Tour will end.

Just a quick mention: If the best on COB have 81, HIL and SPR will proabily be 81 or 82, I suggest a MO metric of 82 as well and not go all the way to 83.
 
Singh
I've never reacted before, but I am a big fan of your dbs. I would like to draw attention to Steven Kruijswijk. I think he is fine at 79 MO, but think his backup stats should be higher, especially RES and END after his attack on the way to Alpe d'Huez, soloing for 68 k, and finishing just seconds behind Quintana. Kruijswijk is at his best in stages with multiple cols and (very) long ITTs (for instance the mountain stage where he took pink in the 2016 Giro, or the ITT in the 2015 Giro).

I personally think he also needs an update on REC as he is usually at his best in the third week, but I think it's best to wait for a week to judge that.

These higher backup stats can make him succesful in GTs (he's basically at the level of Landa, maybe a little bit under) without making him a winner of stage races of a week, which he is not.
Edited by Singh on 22-07-2018 14:53
 
marcoplv95
In my opinion all this discussion is clueless, since everything could change in final week, like Simon Yates. He could have got 81 MON, but then he has fallen.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
The final sprint
The final sprint
PCM10: Official Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 19,576 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 18,474 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 16,645 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 14,652 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,939 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 22,690 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 16,620 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 16,100 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 14,600 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,832 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.41 seconds