|
How does PCM.daily look at your computer?
|
| AaB-ern |
Posted on 07-09-2008 18:41
|
Directeur Sportif
Posts: 1489
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
mrlol wrote:
has something changed to the site or is it just my internet screwing up?
because I've got an 19" widescreen, and normally it's all filled up with the site, but now, there are two white strokes on both sides of the site...
You're definitely right.
We've decided to lock the sites width, so that it looks the same on all screens.
I think the plan is to put some kind of background image on the white areas in the sides.
Edited by AaB-ern on 07-09-2008 18:41
|
| |
|
|
| mrlol |
Posted on 07-09-2008 18:54
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5005
Joined: 24-06-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
 it's really.... eeeh... well.... small. you see, I'm not used to this at all, and the part where you read the post is like this small right now. |
| |
|
|
| icecreamtester |
Posted on 07-09-2008 18:58
|
Stagiare
Posts: 243
Joined: 11-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
mrlol wrote:
it's really.... eeeh... well.... small. you see, I'm not used to this at all, and the part where you read the post is like this small right now.
The posts look the same size to me, just scrunched up. |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 07-09-2008 19:03
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
mrlol wrote:
it's really.... eeeh... well.... small. you see, I'm not used to this at all, and the part where you read the post is like this small right now.
Which screen resolution do you use? |
| |
|
|
| mrlol |
Posted on 07-09-2008 19:22
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5005
Joined: 24-06-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
1440x900 |
| |
|
|
| t-baum |
Posted on 07-09-2008 19:29
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2153
Joined: 07-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I like how it used to be better for sureee
Macquet wrote:
"We all know that wasn't the real footage of the Worlds anyway. That was just the staged footage to perpetuate the coverup that it was actually Vinokourov that won the race." |
| |
|
|
| icecreamtester |
Posted on 07-09-2008 19:36
|
Stagiare
Posts: 243
Joined: 11-05-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
mrlol wrote:
1440x900
That's what I use and I could swear the posts and text are exactly the same size, except for the width, which is obviously different on all displays. |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-12-2024 23:12
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| MarcoPRT |
Posted on 07-09-2008 19:38
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1446
Joined: 07-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I just have white areas in the right side...
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 07-09-2008 20:11
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
The problem is that about 80 % of the visitors used IE with 1024x768. This meant that half of the site wasn't visible to them due to the banner being too large. Therefore, we have had to do this instead. |
| |
|
|
| mrlol |
Posted on 07-09-2008 20:18
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5005
Joined: 24-06-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I can understand it, but it's still a step back for those with 1440x900  |
| |
|
|
| Ak4 |
Posted on 07-09-2008 20:24
|
Stagiare
Posts: 226
Joined: 15-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
It didn't make a difference on how I see the site but I like it more now
[url=www.Dark-Alchemy.com]  [/url]
 |
| |
|
|
| Crommy |
Posted on 07-09-2008 20:25
|
World Champion
Posts: 10018
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
It's so tiny now 
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 07-09-2008 20:32
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
mrlol wrote:
I can understand it, but it's still a step back for those with 1440x900
I use that resolution, and if you can't see anything, you really need to get glasses. |
| |
|
|
| SportingNonsense |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:09
|
Team Manager
Posts: 33046
Joined: 08-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
It seems pushed/squished into the left corner now and I dont like it. If I look at it too long its probably going to give me a headache.
Edited by SportingNonsense on 07-09-2008 21:09
|
| |
|
|
| Smoothie |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:13
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6622
Joined: 04-02-2007
PCM$: 300.00
|
Dont worry guys, i will work on a background that we will all like. Anything you would hate? Also, ill ned a new sig  |
| |
|
|
| SportingNonsense |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:16
|
Team Manager
Posts: 33046
Joined: 08-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
The problem is that about 80 % of the visitors used IE with 1024x768. This meant that half of the site wasn't visible to them due to the banner being too large. Therefore, we have had to do this instead.
Didnt the banner stretch anyway to suit different screen sizes?
|
| |
|
|
| Smoothie |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:18
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6622
Joined: 04-02-2007
PCM$: 300.00
|
No, it wasnt possible. It was fixed at 1400. |
| |
|
|
| SportingNonsense |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:20
|
Team Manager
Posts: 33046
Joined: 08-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Smoothie wrote:
No, it wasnt possible. It was fixed at 1400.
Not possible on IE I presume. It stretched fine on Firefox for me.
Btw: It looks better centred than at one side of the screen (Not that I think its any good compared to what it was)
Edited by SportingNonsense on 07-09-2008 21:27
|
| |
|
|
| doddy13 |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:27
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7891
Joined: 04-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
i don't like it, looks to small... argh noooo!
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 07-09-2008 21:42
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
SportingNonsense wrote:
Smoothie wrote:
No, it wasnt possible. It was fixed at 1400.
Not possible on IE I presume. It stretched fine on Firefox for me.
Btw: It looks better centred than at one side of the screen (Not that I think its any good compared to what it was)
That was the problem. IE didn't render the site like it should. FF did, of course, since it's the best browser.
*sigh* |
| |
|
