matt493 wrote:
you don't no if I voted America. I can tell you I'm not voting for those darn french.
to be embarrassingly truthful, we probably wouldnt be a country, at least when we did without the French
*dodges mob of angry Americans, about to be hung for treason*
America has saved French ass on more than two occasions Relatives of mine have died defending the French nation If you ask me the French owe US. They aren't good at paying back old debts though are they...
matt493 wrote:
you don't no if I voted America. I can tell you I'm not voting for those darn french.
to be embarrassingly truthful, we probably wouldnt be a country, at least when we did without the French
*dodges mob of angry Americans, about to be hung for treason*
America has saved French ass on more than two occasions Relatives of mine have died defending the French nation If you ask me the French owe US. They aren't good at paying back old debts though are they...
So now you are ignoring the fact that the Napoleonic war (Frenchies) enabled you to get your independence by taking up valuable resources away from the Brits so we couldn't beat your arses down B)
Plus the French didn't mind being ruled by Germans, they did a better job of it then their own French ministers
Deadpool wrote:
God, I'm American and I'm not pro-American, I want to know who voted for America besides Levi
His bias is so strong it counts twice
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
dave92 wrote:
outside of America, people are generally less biased, or at least able to think coherently
no, but seriously Edited by issoisso on 13-03-2008 07:59
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
CrueTrue wrote:
We're having a lot of polls lately...
Worst thing is that I don't really have an opinion on any of them
Same here. Not that I think that these polls are a bad thing. They just feel a bit "which religion is the right one?" to me.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
Yeah, but I find that if you just leave it to open discussion something like the America back-and-forth happens, and you never get a good bearing on the outcome.
Note: I've done most of the recent polls, I think 3 out of the last 5
pff this is a stupid poll man
I think a cycling nation is more than having good riders, but also having tradition, big races, history, passion, big crowds, etc
I dont understand how Portugal got two votes and NL/Fr only one, and why USA gets so much votes when its a country where 20 other sports are more popular than cycling.
