Astana Out of Tour
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 01:14
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
matt493 |
Posted on 14-02-2008 23:55
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3549
Joined: 01-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I don't think armstrong doped. |
|
|
|
Viborg FF |
Posted on 14-02-2008 23:57
|
Under 23
Posts: 58
Joined: 09-06-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Thats your believe, i could maybe believe you, if he won less than 7 times, and if he didnt have been so superior. |
|
|
|
matt493 |
Posted on 14-02-2008 23:58
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3549
Joined: 01-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
You can't just say someone doped because he wins. |
|
|
|
stuartmcstuart |
Posted on 14-02-2008 23:59
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1682
Joined: 02-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I don't think its fair to call Contador a doper until there is hard evidence. Plus, I feel the organisers have acted a little unfairly towards Astana in many ways. one, because it is not the same team organisation as last year, and two, all teams should have been given a fresh start after the breakaway from the PT.
I would be surprised if Astana maintain their sponsorship now, they've basically got the worst rep, not going to any races, and all the main Kazak riders have been suspended for doping
It has put the country on the map though, along with Borat, their other comedy export |
|
|
|
matt493 |
Posted on 15-02-2008 00:01
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3549
Joined: 01-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
stuartmcstuart wrote:
I don't think its fair to call Contador a doper until there is hard evidence. Plus, I feel the organisers have acted a little unfairly towards Astana in many ways. one, because it is not the same team organisation as last year, and two, all teams should have been given a fresh start after the breakaway from the PT.
I would be surprised if Astana maintain their sponsorship now, they've basically got the worst rep, not going to any races, and all the main Kazak riders have been suspended for doping
It has put the country on the map though, along with Borat, their other comedy export
I 2nd that. It's unfair to Astana |
|
|
|
Viborg FF |
Posted on 15-02-2008 00:02
|
Under 23
Posts: 58
Joined: 09-06-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
matt493 wrote:
You can't just say someone doped because he wins.
Well, he came back from cancer and got a lot strongere, that just dont fit in my world, but hey maybe i am just dont know about all the powers cancer give you |
|
|
|
matt493 |
Posted on 15-02-2008 00:04
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3549
Joined: 01-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
He was always good before cancer but cancer gave him a new perspective. It helped mentally more than physically. |
|
|
|
Levi4life |
Posted on 15-02-2008 00:47
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4882
Joined: 16-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Cancer also gave Armstrong a clean slate. when his classics muscles atrophied he had a choice. He could go back to the rider he was or pursue a new type of racing.
Certainly cancer have Armstrong a little more purpose.
|
|
|
|
Macquet |
Posted on 15-02-2008 01:05
|
Domestique
Posts: 655
Joined: 28-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Guido Mukk wrote:
Mazzoleni
Kessler
Vino
Kasechkin
isnt that more then enough to not invite that team..
And which of those riders is still on the team?? Just curious? |
|
|
|
rjc_43 |
Posted on 15-02-2008 01:36
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6716
Joined: 13-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
No, but they have imported half of discovery... lets look at how many ex discovery riders have gone on to appear/be found out to be dopers... hmm. get the point? Its just the air around certain teams doesn't make people like them, and what with last year, and what with discovery basically jumping into astanas ship it just doesnt look good. Yeah too bad Kloden, but other then that i don't think that the rest of the disco lads should be following master drug planner around the place. Surely someone else can provide their drugs?
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk] [/url]
|
|
|
|
dave92 |
Posted on 15-02-2008 02:16
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2946
Joined: 21-04-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I personally am suspicous of Contador because he's linked to Puerto. Then he chooses to go to a team with a rep for doping, at the very least its a dumb move. Thats assuming he's clean though . I do think that signing for Astana is a stupid enough move to Astana had to know they werent gaurenteed anything, Unibet got screwed over and there wasnt this much outcry.
|
|
|
|
Levi4life |
Posted on 15-02-2008 05:24
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4882
Joined: 16-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
rjc_43 wrote:
No, but they have imported half of discovery... lets look at how many ex discovery riders have gone on to appear/be found out to be dopers... hmm. get the point? Its just the air around certain teams doesn't make people like them, and what with last year, and what with discovery basically jumping into astanas ship it just doesnt look good. Yeah too bad Kloden, but other then that i don't think that the rest of the disco lads should be following master drug planner around the place. Surely someone else can provide their drugs?
How many can you name? Just curious cause I can't name that many and really its only suspicion or fucked up tests.
Surely you can back up your statement?
|
|
|
|
CrueTrue |
Posted on 15-02-2008 07:49
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I find it funny that many of Armstrong's helpers have been found guilty of doping later on: Hamilton, Landis, Heras, etc., etc. I also find it very suspicious that Armstrong could win over riders with huge margins although these were later caught, for example Ullrich, Basso, Hamilton, Beloki, Mancebo, ....
But then again, we've had this discussion millions of times. The American members deny everything and say that it's just the best team in the world due its mental strongness, the rest of the world think they are a bunch of dopers. Done, over and out. |
|
|
|
issoisso |
Posted on 15-02-2008 07:59
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
It was almost 3 years ago and I still have to do this. From now on I'll probably just start answering americans on this topic with "you're right. Armstrong is a saint. end of story"
Why can't the season just start so we can talk about cycling?
ESPN: People might look at you and say, "You're smart, you're driven, you probably could have gone into another industry. Why do this?"
Jon Vaughters: Everyone on the planet knows about that little IM conversation I had with Frankie Andreu.
That was sort of like before I had this dream, and it was when I didn't know what to do with this passion I had. I was angry about what was going on, and there was
nothing to do about it other than bitch and moan to your buddy on the Internet. That was a very public example of how negative I was at that time. And now, I have
something entirely and totally positive that I can pour all that into. It's very cathartic for me. Now, with Taylor Phinney on our junior team, you can draw the line of
responsibility very directly. You have someone who will, almost certainly, be one of the best professional riders in the world in six years' time. So is it not your
responsibility to do everything you can? I know his mom and dad. I don't want to have to lie to his mom and dad seven years from now … but the sad story is that in
cycling 10 years ago, that is the way the story would have gone.
What IM conversation is that, you ask?
it's the one that Frankie Andreu had to admit in court that did happen. why? because his wife was the one who submitted it as evidence to the court. here's the extract:
Cyclevaughters: frankie - hey - thanks for talking the other day
FDREU: no problem, where are you
Cyclevaughters: back in CO
FDREU: nice, I just got home, isnt' it like 5AM
Cyclevaughters: sometimes i think i'm going to go nuts
Cyclevaughters: yeah
Cyclevaughters: it's 5am
FDREU: I agree, I came home and the air conditioning is broken
Cyclevaughters: ouch
FDREU: did your kid grow twice it's size in the two weeks you were gone
Cyclevaughters: yeah, his feet look bigger for some eason
FDREU: funny
Cyclevaughters: anyhow, i never can quite figure out why i don't just play along with the lance crowd - i mean shit it would make my life easier, eh? it's not like i never played with hotsauce, eh?
FDREU: I know, but in the end i don't think it comes back to bite you
FDREU: I play along, my wife does not, and Lance hates us both
FDREU: it's a no win situation, you know how he is. Once you leave the team or do soemthing wrong you forever banned
Cyclevaughters: i suppose - you know he tried to hire me back in 2001... he was nice to me... i just couldn't deal with that whole world
FDREU: I did not know that
FDREU: look at why everyone leaves, it's way to controlling
Cyclevaughters: once I went to CA and saw that now all the teams got 25 injections every day
Cyclevaughters: hell, CA was ZERO
FDREU: you mean all the riders
Cyclevaughters: Credit Agricole
FDREU: it's crazy
Cyclevaughters: So, I realized lance was full of shit when he'd say everyone was doing it
FDREU: You may read stuff that i say to radio or press, praising the Tour and lance but it's just playing the game
Cyclevaughters: believe me, as carzy as it sounds - Moreau was on nothing. Hct of 39%
FDREU: when in 2000-2001
Cyclevaughters: so, that's when you start thinking... hell, kevin was telling me that after 2000 Ullrich never raced over 42%--- yeah moreau in 2000-2001
Cyclevaughters: anyhow - whtever
FDREU: After 1999, you know many things changed. lance did not
FDREU: I believe that's part of whey kevin left, he was tired of the stuff
Cyclevaughters: yeah, i could explain the whole way lance dupes everyone
FDREU: what abut GH climbing the mountains better than azevedo and the entire group
Cyclevaughters: from how floyd described it, i know exactly the methos
FDREU: explain that, classics to climber
FDREU: when did you talk with floyd
Cyclevaughters: i don't know - i want to trust George
Cyclevaughters: but the thing is on that team, you think it's normal
Cyclevaughters: or at least i did
FDREU: i guess. anything with blodd is not normal
Cyclevaughters: yeah, it's very complex how the avoid all the controls now, but it's not any new drug or anything, just the resources and planning to pull of a well devised plan
Cyclevaughters: it's why they all got dropped on stage 9 - no refill yet - then on the rest day - boom 800ml of packed cells
FDREU: they have it mastered. good point
Cyclevaughters: they draw the blood right after the dauphine
FDREU: how do they sneak it in, or keep it until needed
FDREU: i'm sure it's not with the truck in the frig
Cyclevaughters: motorcycle - refridgerated panniers
Cyclevaughters: on the rest day
Cyclevaughters: floyd has a photo of the thing
FDREU: crazy! it' just keep going to new levels
Cyclevaughters: yeah, it's complicated, but with enough money you can do it
FDREU: they have enough money. Floyd was so pissed at them this entire tour
Cyclevaughters: anyhow - i just feel sorry for floyd and some of the other guys
Cyclevaughters: why would lance keep doing the shit when he clearly has nothing to prove - it's weird
FDREU: I know. me to. they all get ripped into for no reason
FDREU: he's done now, thank god. but they will prove next year for Johan's sake that they are the greatest
Cyclevaughters: and then lance says " this guy and that guys are pussies"
FDREU: they won't stop
FDREU: I agree
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
|
Aquarius |
Posted on 15-02-2008 08:17
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 5220
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I think Crue True summed it up very well.
Whatever we could come up with, it would either be a jealous European/French conspiracy, the test would have no legal or scientific value.
Americans train harder, they've got a stronger mentality against crybabies like us.
I don't think ASO are that blind actually. With Armstrong, Bruyneel and co. it was more a matter of how to prove it, how to catch them rather than "are they cheating ?"
Add that ability not to be caught to a team that is famous for its dope use, and you've got it. The biggest swindle. If it didn't turn into a swindle and they'd get caught, well, we'd just get some more scandals. Having Astana in would have been a lose-lose situation.
How can you feel sorry for Klöden ? The man was in two teams who've proved how much dope they used. He even appeared to be their leader...
Do you guys know that dope is not useless ? |
|
|
|
issoisso |
Posted on 15-02-2008 08:21
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Aquarius wrote:train harder, they've got a stronger mentality against crybabies like us
That was Vino's theory on himself
we all know how that turned out
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
|
Guido Mukk |
Posted on 15-02-2008 10:48
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15830
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Macquet wrote:
Guido Mukk wrote:
Mazzoleni
Kessler
Vino
Kasechkin
isnt that more then enough to not invite that team..
And which of those riders is still on the team?? Just curious?
Ok we have to disqualify them again..
Astana team based on Liberty-würth..has been banned 2 years straight..yes they changed manger between..doesnt seems to help.
Why risk again..?
And this year TdF is ASO party ..why they should invite quest who cant behave
Edited by Guido Mukk on 15-02-2008 10:50
|
|
|
|
Crommy |
Posted on 15-02-2008 10:57
|
World Champion
Posts: 10018
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Because you can't ban a team because you have a hunch they dope. Yes, they did last year, but they have a new management this year. It's just wrong. Yes, if they do have a doping case with evidence brought before the, by all means, ban them (and I'm hoping that Contador will soon get done), but you can't just decide to get rid of a team because you think they dope.
|
|
|
|
rodda |
Posted on 15-02-2008 11:32
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2276
Joined: 17-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Crommy wrote:
Because you can't ban a team because you have a hunch they dope. Yes, they did last year, but they have a new management this year. It's just wrong. Yes, if they do have a doping case with evidence brought before the, by all means, ban them (and I'm hoping that Contador will soon get done), but you can't just decide to get rid of a team because you think they dope.
but they can.... and they have
|
|
|
|
p3druh |
Posted on 15-02-2008 11:56
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2667
Joined: 28-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
There is talk of Contador being "loaned" to another team for the Tour...
I wonder, is that even possible?
And if it is, couldn't it be possible that a smaller team would be more than willing to loan 9 Astana riders and make them rider the Tour for their team?
Me smell conterversy...
Edited by p3druh on 15-02-2008 11:58
|
|
|