CrueTrue wrote:
I don't get how they can't prosecute them. It's so damn obvious. And they even managed to get rich on killing their daughter.
Well, some of issoisso's information is slightly wrong. Unless of course, all I've put here is more British censored material
Inconclusive material
This "evidence" was the reactions of cadaver and human-blood sniffer dogs at points in the apartment and in a car hired weeks after Madeleine went missing and results from forensic tests on samples taken from these.
But the Birmingham laboratory that did the tests had already warned that the results were inconclusive.
In an e-mail dated 3 September 2007, John Lowe of the major incidents team of the Forensic Science Service wrote that findings regarding a possible match between DNA in the samples and Madeleine's DNA were "too complex for meaningful interpretation".
The McCanns' spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, who had criticised police for failing to secure the crime scene, has now accused them of misrepresenting the evidence.
Madeleine McCann
Questions put to Kate McCann
Before putting the evidence to the couple in separate interviews, police had to declare them arguidos, assuring them the right to remain silent.
After Kate McCann was made an arguido, she declined to answer dozens of questions, such as what she saw and did on finding Madeleine gone; and why, when she raised the alarm, she left her two-year-old twins alone in the apartment.
She was fully within her rights not to respond, and according to the couple's spokesman was advised by her lawyer not to.
Only when asked by police if she realised she was jeopardising the investigation did she say: "yes, if that's what the investigation thinks."
Crommy wrote:
Well, some of issoisso's information is slightly wrong. Unless of course, all I've put here is more British censored material
Inconclusive material
This "evidence" was the reactions of cadaver and human-blood sniffer dogs at points in the apartment and in a car hired weeks after Madeleine went missing and results from forensic tests on samples taken from these.
But the Birmingham laboratory that did the tests had already warned that the results were inconclusive.
In an e-mail dated 3 September 2007, John Lowe of the major incidents team of the Forensic Science Service wrote that findings regarding a possible match between DNA in the samples and Madeleine's DNA were "too complex for meaningful interpretation".
The McCanns' spokesman, Clarence Mitchell, who had criticised police for failing to secure the crime scene, has now accused them of misrepresenting the evidence.
Madeleine McCann
Questions put to Kate McCann
Before putting the evidence to the couple in separate interviews, police had to declare them arguidos, assuring them the right to remain silent.
After Kate McCann was made an arguido, she declined to answer dozens of questions, such as what she saw and did on finding Madeleine gone; and why, when she raised the alarm, she left her two-year-old twins alone in the apartment.
She was fully within her rights not to respond, and according to the couple's spokesman was advised by her lawyer not to.
Only when asked by police if she realised she was jeopardising the investigation did she say: "yes, if that's what the investigation thinks."
2 independent labs determined the DNA was of the little girl. The birmingham lab originally said it was no doubt hers and that they were just finishing up paperwork that would take a couple of days......then they took 2 months and the paperwork said it was inconclusive.
Smell something fishy?
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
2 independent labs determined the DNA was of the little girl. The birmingham lab originally said it was no doubt hers and that they were just finishing up paperwork that would take a couple of days......then they took 2 months and the paperwork said it was inconclusive.
Smell something fishy?
Save us Brits - Gordon Brown is censoring our media, where will he go next Edited by Crommy on 05-08-2008 21:06
