|
Some PCM 2011 Stats
|
| Zanci93 |
Posted on 21-06-2011 17:12
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 276
Joined: 19-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
neve57 wrote:
pmtg99 wrote:
With the sprinters, overall. Regardless of any brilliant AI innovation that could have been implimented, no sprinter (bar maybe Friere) will ever win Milan San Remo
in pcm2010 only sprinters won when i was playing
You can easily win with a rider like Cancellara or Gilbert. The Sprinters don't have enough teammates in the final when you go fullgas uphill ! |
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 21-06-2011 17:13
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22246
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
Main change in my version is that the last downhill section, where the sprint starts isn`t a narrow road. So the positioning of the sprinters is working much better than on narrow roads.
Also the flat part in the end is a bit longer and the other hills are changed that way (mix between narrow and normal roads), that tests showed the most realistic result. |
| |
|
|
| neve57 |
Posted on 21-06-2011 17:14
|
Domestique
Posts: 672
Joined: 13-09-2009
PCM$: 300.00
|
Zanci93 wrote:
neve57 wrote:
pmtg99 wrote:
With the sprinters, overall. Regardless of any brilliant AI innovation that could have been implimented, no sprinter (bar maybe Friere) will ever win Milan San Remo
in pcm2010 only sprinters won when i was playing
You can easily win with a rider like Cancellara or Gilbert. The Sprinters don't have enough teammates in the final when you go fullgas uphill !
yeah i know,
i didn't mean it like that.
But i was answering to a guy the mean't you can't win with sprinters |
| |
|
|
| neve57 |
Posted on 21-06-2011 17:15
|
Domestique
Posts: 672
Joined: 13-09-2009
PCM$: 300.00
|
roturn wrote:
Main change in my version is that the last downhill section, where the sprint starts isn`t a narrow road. So the positioning of the sprinters is working much better than on narrow roads.
Also the flat part in the end is a bit longer and the other hills are changed that way (mix between narrow and normal roads), that tests showed the most realistic result.
sweeet  |
| |
|
|
| Zanci93 |
Posted on 21-06-2011 17:17
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 276
Joined: 19-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
roturn wrote:
Main change in my version is that the last downhill section, where the sprint starts isn`t a narrow road. So the positioning of the sprinters is working much better than on narrow roads.
Also the flat part in the end is a bit longer and the other hills are changed that way (mix between narrow and normal roads), that tests showed the most realistic result.
That's good to hear! I also think that it was really difficult to form a real sprint. The way to the finish was to short. And half of the sprint was in the downhill !! |
| |
|
|
| RaydoN |
Posted on 21-06-2011 19:13
|
Amateur
Posts: 20
Joined: 20-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
kreuziger only 72 in TT????!!! |
| |
|
|
| Roman |
Posted on 21-06-2011 19:28
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4386
Joined: 29-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
RaydoN wrote:
kreuziger only 72 in TT????!!!
I think that's pretty realistic for him..
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 23-11-2024 18:35
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| nielsinho1997 |
Posted on 21-06-2011 19:29
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 49
Joined: 06-04-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Roman wrote:
RaydoN wrote:
kreuziger only 72 in TT????!!!
I think that's pretty realistic for him..
Now he can't really win any BT in his life
I have bad english
|
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 23-06-2011 08:38
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Roman wrote:
RaydoN wrote:
kreuziger only 72 in TT????!!!
I think that's pretty realistic for him..
That is sadly right,maybe 73,74
But Sagan nowhere is ridicoulus, he should have something like 74Hill and 76-78 sprint and ACC |
| |
|
|
| pibinho |
Posted on 05-08-2011 00:45
|
Amateur
Posts: 6
Joined: 29-04-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Andy Schleck 70 in TT. What the fuck is that? |
| |
|
|
| lasseolsen |
Posted on 05-08-2011 05:57
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 30
Joined: 23-01-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
its the truth
|
| |
|
|
| cactus-jack |
Posted on 05-08-2011 07:31
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3936
Joined: 31-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
pibinho wrote:
Andy Schleck 70 in TT. What the fuck is that?
I might give him 72, but I feel that anything from 70-73 reflects his ability. |
| |
|
|
| cactus-jack |
Posted on 05-08-2011 07:34
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3936
Joined: 31-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
I feel that Edvald Boasson Hagen should have a bit more than 73 in hill. I know I might be a bit biased, but I would say 74, 75 if you stretch it far... |
| |
|
