|
Champions League 2011/12
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 26-04-2012 08:48
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Edited by Avin Wargunnson on 26-04-2012 08:49
|
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 26-04-2012 08:52
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Btw. it is reported, that Mourinho visited Bayern's locker room after the match and congratulated to their every single player for reaching the Finals. Respect!
|
| |
|
|
| cunego59 |
Posted on 26-04-2012 11:11
|
Team Manager
Posts: 6508
Joined: 14-09-2008
PCM$: 1090.00
|
So Bayern defense in the final will probably look like this, I guess:
-------------Neuer-------------
Rafinha-Boateng-Tymo-Lahm
-----Kroos------Schweins.----
Good thing I'm for Chelsea 
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 04-12-2024 19:37
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Montolivo |
Posted on 26-04-2012 11:16
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1032
Joined: 16-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Should be a Drogba-Meireles party against that defence.  |
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 26-04-2012 11:32
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Montolivo wrote:
Should be a Drogba-Meireles party against that defence.
Meireles will party on the stands, as he is banned because of cards, together with Terry, Ramires and Ivanovic. Chelsea has no defence at all at tis point. 
|
| |
|
|
| Alakagom |
Posted on 26-04-2012 11:36
|
World Champion
Posts: 10891
Joined: 19-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
Montolivo wrote:
Should be a Drogba-Meireles party against that defence.
Meireles will party on the stands, as he is banned because of cards, together with Terry, Ramires and Ivanovic. Chelsea has no defence at all at tis point.
Bosingwa, Cahil, Luiz and Ashely Cole. Droga is a great defender too  Luiz and Cahil will be fit for the final.
Ramiers and Ivanovic are the biggest blows to the team, with Mata those are the 3 best players in the season for Chelsea.
Edited by Alakagom on 26-04-2012 11:37
|
| |
|
|
| Ste117 |
Posted on 26-04-2012 12:10
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3684
Joined: 21-02-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Bayern's year this year, at home aswell, I think they will be too strong for Chelsea.
MG Team manager Team Ticos Air Costa Rica
 |
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 26-04-2012 12:13
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Alakagom wrote:
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
Montolivo wrote:
Should be a Drogba-Meireles party against that defence.
Meireles will party on the stands, as he is banned because of cards, together with Terry, Ramires and Ivanovic. Chelsea has no defence at all at tis point.
Bosingwa, Cahil, Luiz and Ashely Cole. Droga is a great defender too Luiz and Cahil will be fit for the final.
Ramiers and Ivanovic are the biggest blows to the team, with Mata those are the 3 best players in the season for Chelsea.
Bosingwa and Luiz are so abyssmal defenders i did not count them
|
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 26-04-2012 12:49
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
Watch out in Down Under, Ramos is kicking the penalty! 
|
| |
|
|
| Montolivo |
Posted on 26-04-2012 12:59
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1032
Joined: 16-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
|
| |
|
|
| Ste117 |
Posted on 26-04-2012 13:12
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3684
Joined: 21-02-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
That's awesome hahaha
MG Team manager Team Ticos Air Costa Rica
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 26-04-2012 14:36
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Bayern - Chelsea ... well, imagine a world where Manchester City wins the Premier League, and Chelsea takes CL. That'd suck.
I don't like Bayern at all, but they are still preferable over Chelsea. |
| |
|
|
| Montolivo |
Posted on 26-04-2012 14:58
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1032
Joined: 16-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Why would that suck Crue? Just because they used more money to come to the top of the PL instead of Man Utd?  |
| |
|
|
| Michal4444 |
Posted on 26-04-2012 15:06
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 250
Joined: 27-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Montolivo wrote:
Why would that suck Crue? Just because they used more money to come to the top of the PL instead of Man Utd?
he forget that Utd also spent money in past. And a lot of money; |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 26-04-2012 15:57
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
In my mind, it does suck if you can just spend a billion euro and immediately become a top team. I prefer teams that are built up slowly and steadily and climb to the top that way.
But that's just me being old-fashioned, I guess. Feel free to blame me for being a hypocrite based on the fact that United may or may not have spent a whole lot of money to become a top team back in the beginning of the 1900's. |
| |
|
|
| Michal4444 |
Posted on 26-04-2012 16:31
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 250
Joined: 27-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
In my mind, it does suck if you can just spend a billion euro and immediately become a top team. I prefer teams that are built up slowly and steadily and climb to the top that way.
But that's just me being old-fashioned, I guess. Feel free to blame me for being a hypocrite based on the fact that United may or may not have spent a whole lot of money to become a top team back in the beginning of the 1900's.
I don´t like spending as much also. But almost every top team is spent money when they needed in the past. What about Veron for 28 million pounds and it was 10 years ago where prices were lower. So even Utd or Arsenal or any other big team spent a lot of money. But yeah I agree that in shorter time it look much worse. So I feel free to blame you for being only Half-hypocrite. Not because of 1900's but because of 1990's and later |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 26-04-2012 16:46
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I certainly doubt that United - at any point - has spent as much during one season or two seasons as Chelsea did in the years after 2003 and City in the years after the Arab dudes took over. In fact, I don't doubt, I know for sure.
You can always point out one huge transfer, but that doesn't change the facts. From 1992-2011, Chelsea spent £25,798,250 on average per season, City spent £23,681,350. United? £8,865,500. That's despite the fact that City and Chelsea didn't get rich until mid-00's (even later for City) while United has been a top club during that entire period.
That being said, the hypocritical part is - where do you draw the line? When is much too much? I don't know |
| |
|
|
| Michal4444 |
Posted on 26-04-2012 17:19
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 250
Joined: 27-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
That being said, the hypocritical part is - where do you draw the line? When is much too much? I don't know
That is the reason why I called Half-hypocite and I am one as well - football today IS about money. It is sad but it is true.  |
| |
|
|
| solano |
Posted on 26-04-2012 17:39
|
Stagiare
Posts: 181
Joined: 06-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
I'm not a United fan, but they have built their success over a number of years. They have expanded their stadium and built up a fanbase abroad. They could be spending more now but for the fact that the Glazers take lots out of the club to pay off debts elsewhere.
It's not the same as being given lots of money out of the blue. |
| |
|
|
| Avin Wargunnson |
Posted on 26-04-2012 17:43
|
World Champion
Posts: 14236
Joined: 20-06-2011
PCM$: 300.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
In my mind, it does suck if you can just spend a billion euro and immediately become a top team. I prefer teams that are built up slowly and steadily and climb to the top that way.
But that's just me being old-fashioned, I guess. Feel free to blame me for being a hypocrite based on the fact that United may or may not have spent a whole lot of money to become a top team back in the beginning of the 1900's.
This and only, i agree completly. And one cant really compare Chelsea or City to clubs like United or Arsenal, the approach to the buying and raising of players is absolutely different. Also they have added value in tradition.
During last couple of years Arsenal has almost +-0 zero transfer differential and still has one of the most talented players in England, compared to hundreds od millions that Chelsea and City used
It does not mean Chelsea or City are not quality clubs, but i would respect them more with different policy.
Edited by Avin Wargunnson on 26-04-2012 17:44
|
| |
|
