|
TOTC 2: TOTC3 starts December 1st
|
| The Rider |
Posted on 10-11-2013 16:39
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4543
Joined: 29-02-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
I can't promise you an exact time but I can promise you that draft 2 will take place this evening. Most teams will be filling up their squads with quality domestiques to form the backbone of their squad.
There are many questions ahead of the draft:
--- Can Nacho63 bounce back after picking up just one rider in draft 1?
--- Will anyone miss out on more than one rider in this draft?
--- Will anyone take the low average riders in this draft?
--- Who will get the best of the remaining sprinters (of which there are many)?
All will be answered tonight. |
| |
|
|
| MrUfo87 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 16:44
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2803
Joined: 06-01-2012
PCM$: 700.00
|
I've sent it. 
|
| |
|
|
| nacho63 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 17:24
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1944
Joined: 14-03-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Your first question scares me |
| |
|
|
| Ollfardh |
Posted on 10-11-2013 19:30
|
World Champion
Posts: 14591
Joined: 08-08-2011
PCM$: 9200.00
|
Wondering if people remembered they can only select 4 good riders 
Changed my sig, this was getting absurd.
|
| |
|
|
| knockout |
Posted on 10-11-2013 19:43
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7753
Joined: 21-12-2010
PCM$: 400.00
|
I thought the same.
And in fact, it made my selection quite difficult as the riders I wanted the most were not the best riders but I had to chose them in the first row because if I selected them for the 2nd or 3rd row I might have ended up with more good riders than I wanted to have...
Btw. Is the live draft also at 21:00 GMT or is is later?
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters! |
| |
|
|
| brewers90 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:16
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3711
Joined: 01-09-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
What do you mean you can only have four good riders? Did I miss something?  |
| |
|
|
| The Rider |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:17
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4543
Joined: 29-02-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
The draft is taking place now. 547984 failed to submit any draft choices for this round and once again so did Admirschleck so both of their riders were chosen with a random number generator.
Results for Draft 2 (Round 4)
64)ATLANTIUS PAOLO TIRALONGO
65)JESLEYH MARTIN ELMIGER
66)IAN BUTLER XAVIER FLORENCIO
67)TMR96 FELIX CARDENAS
68)JAXIKA MIKAEL ASTARLOZA
69)THE HOBBIT STEFANO GARZELLI
70)CYCLEMAN123 PALUMBO
71)WELKER2357 DAVID BLANCO
72)MARCODVW GRAEME BROWN
73)547984 BUCHACEK
74)BREWERS90 FRANCESCO MANCEBO
75)THEMANXMISSILE RUSS DOWNING
76)KNOCKOUT BRETT LANCASTER
77)MRUFO87 IKER CAMANO
78)NACHO63 EZEKIEL MOSQUERA
79) ADMIRSCHLECK NICO EECKHOUT
80)SUTTY68 GABRIEL RASCH
81)DIPPOFIX REMI MCMANUS
82)SELWINK EUGENE WACKER
83)MVHOOGDALEM FRANCK VERMEULEN
84)OLLFARDH ANGEL VICIOSO
For Pick #83 I had to go to row 2 for mvhoogdalem
For Pick #84 I had to go to row 2 for Ollfardh |
| |
|
|
| knockout |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:19
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7753
Joined: 21-12-2010
PCM$: 400.00
|
brewers90 wrote:
What do you mean you can only have four good riders? Did I miss something?
only 4 riders over AVG of 70 so can make the range <=70
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters! |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 22-12-2024 18:52
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Dippofix |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:19
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3912
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
Well, if you have five AVG 71 and upwards riders, you'd need five AVG 69 and downwards riders. That'd leave ypu with 10 though. So yeah, only four good riders.
|
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:20
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15274
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Damn.
You could take every rider, but you chose the guy I wanted badly!
@Atlantius 
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| The Rider |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:20
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4543
Joined: 29-02-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
knockout wrote:
brewers90 wrote:
What do you mean you can only have four good riders? Did I miss something?
only 4 riders over AVG of 70 so can make the range <=70
What are you on about!? |
| |
|
|
| brewers90 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:21
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3711
Joined: 01-09-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Surely only the best and worst riders are relevant for a range average. For example, if you have a 78, you have to have a 62. Isn't what you're saying the mean average? |
| |
|
|
| mvhoogdalem |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:21
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2244
Joined: 30-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Lol.. the results from this round doesn't look good for me in the next rounds. |
| |
|
|
| The Rider |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:22
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4543
Joined: 29-02-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
Dippofix wrote:
Well, if you have five AVG 71 and upwards riders, you'd need five AVG 69 and downwards riders. That'd leave ypu with 10 though. So yeah, only four good riders.
Didn't you guys do maths.
The range of the team must be 70 or below from only two riders in the entire squad (the single highest and the single lowest). So it doesn't matter what the average of the 7 riders between the highest AVG and lowest AVG rider is.
EDIT: Brewers90 is spot on.
Edited by The Rider on 10-11-2013 21:24
|
| |
|
|
| Dippofix |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:23
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3912
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
I really hope McManus wasn't a stupid choice. It's a really big gamble, because i have no clue what that actually means, especially because i could have had 76 SPR 75 ACC Schulze.
|
| |
|
|
| brewers90 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:23
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3711
Joined: 01-09-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yes, I knew I was right. MATHS!!!!
Wait, so people have deliberately chosen five crap riders because they didn't understand the rules. 
Edited by brewers90 on 10-11-2013 21:25
|
| |
|
|
| Dippofix |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:25
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3912
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
Say What?!?! Dammit, dammit, dammit. I really fucked that one up!
|
| |
|
|
| knockout |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:26
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7753
Joined: 21-12-2010
PCM$: 400.00
|
O damn
I understood it like this:
the range of 70 means that there must be 4 pairs of riders which are added up to 140 or less and one which has an avg of 70.
So, if you have for example riders with 77/74/73/71 AVG you have to take one with 63 or less, one with 66 or less one with 67 or less and one 69 or less. Your last guy than can be 70 or less.
Can I send in another list for round two and three then 
A Big Thank You To All MG Reporters! |
| |
|
|
| brewers90 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:27
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3711
Joined: 01-09-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
knockout wrote:
O damn
I understood it like this:
the range of 70 means that there must be 4 pairs of riders which are added up to 140 or less and one which has an avg of 70.
So, if you have for example riders with 77/74/73/71 AVG you have to take one with 63 or less, one with 66 or less one with 67 or less and one 69 or less. Your last guy than can be 70 or less.
Can I send in another list for round two and three then
That's the mean average. Different thing altogether. I'm no maths genius but I learnt that when I was 11. |
| |
|
|
| sammyt93 |
Posted on 10-11-2013 21:28
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3635
Joined: 03-07-2012
PCM$: 300.00
|
knockout wrote:
O damn
I understood it like this:
the range of 70 means that there must be 4 pairs of riders which are added up to 140 or less and one which has an avg of 70.
So, if you have for example riders with 77/74/73/71 AVG you have to take one with 63 or less, one with 66 or less one with 67 or less and one 69 or less. Your last guy than can be 70 or less.
Can I send in another list for round two and three then
even going by that logic why couldn't you take a guy with 65 average then 1 with 72 and one with 73 to average 70 between the 3 of them?
|
| |
|
