PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 20:04
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 71

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,803
· Newest Member: actronspareparts
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
News in May
CrueTrue
The question does say "Did you ever pay the UCI?", but yes, there's no reason to nitpick on his statement. It does say what you'd expect it to.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 20:04
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
Mresuperstar
I support Lance 110%, mostly because I grew up watching him win 7 TdF's and because I'm from the USA. But I think this might be good for cycling to remove all the dopers and start back up again. Man this is just like baseball.
 
https://twitter.com/Mresuperstar
ABridgeTooFar
Man, you guys are too much. Floyd has zero credibility. Yet you take his latest statements as gospel. Is it because he is finally saying what you guys think?

I am all for the truth and kicking out the dopers including Lance, but we need some evidence! Otherwise this is just high school gossip, tabloid material. We are better than that.
 
Lorkan
ABridgeTooFar wrote:
Man, you guys are too much. Floyd has zero credibility. Yet you take his latest statements as gospel. Is it because he is finally saying what you guys think?

I am all for the truth and kicking out the dopers including Lance, but we need some evidence! Otherwise this is just high school gossip, tabloid material. We are better than that.


You told it quicker than me, I totally agree with you...
 
issoisso
ABridgeTooFar wrote:
Man, you guys are too much. Floyd has zero credibility. Yet you take his latest statements as gospel. Is it because he is finally saying what you guys think?

I am all for the truth and kicking out the dopers including Lance, but we need some evidence! Otherwise this is just high school gossip, tabloid material. We are better than that.


It's because he's saying what many have said before to the point where we know for a fact it's true.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
roturn
2002
He later, while winning the Tour de Swiss, the month before
the Tour de France, tested positive for EPO at which point he and Mr
Bruyneel flew to the UCI headquarters and made a financial agreement with
Mr. Vrubrugen to keep the positive test hidden.


Maybe i am wrong, but how could Armstrong have a positive test during Tour de Suisse 2002 when US Postal didn`t start there???
Maybe the story is true but not 2002 Tour de Suisse Grin
 
CrueTrue
issoisso wrote:
doddy13 wrote:
The International Cycling Union (UCI) categorically rejects accusations made by Mr Floyd Landis, in particular the allegation that a positive doping result by Lance Armstrong during the 2002 Tour of Switzerland was concealed after an agreement was reached between the American rider, his directeur sportif Mr Johan Bruyneel and the former UCI President, Mr Hein Verbruggen.

Deeply shocked by the gravity of this statement, which considerably impinges on the honour of all persons who have dedicated themselves to the fight against doping, the UCI wishes to clearly state that it has never changed or concealed a positive test result.

The accusation by Mr Floyd Landis, guilty himself of a breach of the Anti-Doping Rules in 2006, is thus completely unfounded and the UCI can only express its outrage at this new attempt to harm the image of cycling. Our sport has long paid a heavy price for the fraudulent behaviour of individuals such as Floyd Landis and we cannot accept the principles governing our work being challenged in terms of their ethics and honesty by a person who has not hesitated to breach such principles.

By way of information, the UCI would like to point out that Lance Armstrong did not participate in the 2002 Tour of Switzerland.

Finally, the UCI wishes to make clear that it will undertake all necessary measures to defend its honour as well as the honour of all its executives who have been unfairly accused by Mr Floyd Landis.


That says everything you need to know about the UCI right there.

Specifically that they are willing to distort Landis' words to screw with his credibility.

Landis never said it was the 2002 TdS. He said That in 2002 Armstrong told him that at the time the EPO test was introduced which was in 2001, those events happened.

Who won the 2001 Tour de Suisse? Lance Armstrong

EDIT: As for McQuaid's claim that it couldn't happen because the positive tests at the time were sent immediately not only to the UCI but to the IOC, isn't it convenient that he "forgot" to mention that Verbruggen was also president of the IOC at the time.


Anyone who knows Verbruggen knows this is more than just "a possibility". It is, in fact, something that's day to day business for Verbruggen.

Either way, if Floyd has any evidence and any brains, then he's going to wait until everyone involved denies before presenting it.


Roturn: Issoisso posted the above on the previous page Wink
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
roturn
I haven`t seen this sry.
Well then this is really weak of the UCI. Just "misunderstanding" it.
 
BouBBox
If Landis was doping himself since 2002 it seems that the tests wernt very effective. So nothing can tell that negative tests are correct. Sad
Team Europcar !!

RIP Wouter

www.cyclingbase.com/photos/W/weylandt.jpg
 
CrueTrue
Oh really? Wink

It's been clear for years that doping tests are hardly reliable due to various reasons.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
BouBBox
I was still hoping ... That was naive XD
Team Europcar !!

RIP Wouter

www.cyclingbase.com/photos/W/weylandt.jpg
 
Crommy
BorowitzReport
Angered by steroid accusations, Lance Armstrong threw a car at reporters.

Pfft
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
Crommy
He did acknowledge that the UCI had received money from Armstrong. “The UCI received $100,000 from Lance Armstrong in 2005, four years after this incident was supposed to have taken place.”


Lance has been lying again!
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
ABridgeTooFar
issoisso wrote:
ABridgeTooFar wrote:
Man, you guys are too much. Floyd has zero credibility. Yet you take his latest statements as gospel. Is it because he is finally saying what you guys think?

I am all for the truth and kicking out the dopers including Lance, but we need some evidence! Otherwise this is just high school gossip, tabloid material. We are better than that.


It's because he's saying what many have said before to the point where we know for a fact it's true.


With all due respect to you. issoisso, but unless it can be proven as fact then it is not a fact. In this case in can not.

If you disagree and you feel it is a fact then what does that say about the inaction of WADA, UCI, USADA, IOC and other organizations whose job it is to police these drug violations.
 
ABridgeTooFar
Another point to make is how Landis leaked the story to the Wall Street Journal. Of all people, why the hell would you go to the Wall Street Journal? If the allegations are true and he wants to make a difference then why not go directly to USADA or WADA?

All talk and no proof. Did anyone point out that this investigation could prevent LA from riding in the TdF? Just a thought.
 
Crommy
ABridgeTooFar wrote:
Another point to make is how Landis leaked the story to the Wall Street Journal. Of all people, why the hell would you go to the Wall Street Journal? If the allegations are true and he wants to make a difference then why not go directly to USADA or WADA?


He did Wink
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
Aquarius
Yeah, no proof, no trial, so he's "innocent until proven guilty", and we shouldn't accuse Lance of anything, should we ?

Yet, we're no court. And we have freedom of opinion and freedom of speech.
What Landis claimed about his testosterone test was possible, but extremly unlikely.
What he claims now is very detailed, it's possible, and extremely likely (there's a lot of coherency in it with what many people have been telling for years, caught dopeheads, followers, investigators, journalists, whoever...).

Oh, and it seems he didn't go straight to the WSJ, he shared emails with USADA, UCI, WADA (?) for a month or so, and then WSJ got excerpts of those emails. Unless I got it wrong...
 
issoisso
ABridgeTooFar wrote:
With all due respect to you. issoisso, but unless it can be proven as fact then it is not a fact. In this case in can not.


So, if you hear a gunshot, turn around and see a man standing over a bloody corpse with a smoking gun in his hand, it's not a fact that he's a murderer just because you can't prove it?



ABridgeTooFar wrote:
If you disagree and you feel it is a fact then what does that say about the inaction of WADA, UCI, USADA, IOC and other organizations whose job it is to police these drug violations.


The UCI are corrupt. The IOC have nothing to do with it. The other two are investigating.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
doddy13
Meanwhile
Mickeal Larpe (France)
Alessandro Coló (Italy)

are suspended after a positive test.

Larpe - 20 March 2010 - Châtenay-Malabry
Colo 25 April 2010 (Tour of Mexico) - Los Angeles.


oh and the U23 Cyclocross champion is now Arnaud Jouffroy of France after the disqualifications that happened there.
Edited by doddy13 on 21-05-2010 17:01
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
Crommy
Lance suggests he'll be releasing the e-mails Floyd has been sending him within the hour
emoticons4u.com/happy/042.gif
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Contador attacking
Contador attacking
PCM11: General Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 1.02 seconds