PCM.daily banner
23-11-2024 18:31
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 63

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,796
· Newest Member: PogPatrol23
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Sky Doping/Hate Thread
Ad Bot
Posted on 23-11-2024 18:31
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
atlanta
Exactly come on Mr fortune teller Colsack prove it. No doubt we will here the well Armstrong dint fail. I think Froome would have had an issue by now their as not been one sample we hear that is even questionable so you keep holding onto your dream he will oneday fail and then you will have the last laugh.Wink
 
atlanta
Cossack i meant.
 
Avin Wargunnson
cdn.memegenerator.net/instances/500x/28120368.jpg


Pfft
I'll be back
 
Aquarius
atlanta wrote:
Exactly come on Mr fortune teller Colsack prove it. No doubt we will here the well Armstrong dint fail. I think Froome would have had an issue by now their as not been one sample we hear that is even questionable so you keep holding onto your dream he will oneday fail and then you will have the last laugh.Wink
True, Armstrong had dodgy sample in 1999, then in 2001, in 2005 again (but 1999 ones).

Let's pick another example : Virenque. Busted for drugs, used them before and after the Festina affair, before and after his suspension. He has a record of... 0 positive test, which is no more than Froome.
 
admirschleck
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
*image* Pfft


You should really take care of your attitude, language and finally start to behave better over here. It's a gentleman club, at the end. Pfft Pfft
Edited by admirschleck on 06-05-2014 09:07
Manager of www.dodaj.rs/f/41/er/4zELHZA1/nor.pngTeam Nordeus www.dodaj.rs/f/41/er/4zELHZA1/nor.png
 
Cossack
atlanta wrote:
Exactly come on Mr fortune teller Colsack prove it. No doubt we will here the well Armstrong dint fail. I think Froome would have had an issue by now their as not been one sample we hear that is even questionable so you keep holding onto your dream he will oneday fail and then you will have the last laugh.Wink


I'm not saying that Sky are definitaly doped, but their defenders usually just tell these Brailsford's excuses and do not react to the arguments like dodgy doctors working for Sky etc. at all.
 
cunego59
atlanta wrote:
Exactly come on Mr fortune teller Colsack prove it. No doubt we will here the well Armstrong dint fail. I think Froome would have had an issue by now their as not been one sample we hear that is even questionable so you keep holding onto your dream he will oneday fail and then you will have the last laugh.Wink


It may be possible that he tests positive in the future and no one will know. According to this, from 2015 on the WADA grants positive top athletes complete amnesty and anonymity in exchange for information. They would even get to keep their price money.
 
Avin Wargunnson
That stinks as rotten meat. Frown

I mean, as said in the article, it can help maybe to catch the people behind the scenes, who are actual movers of the things around doping, but complete amnesty and non returning of prize money? I dont like it in criminal law and i dont like it in "sport law" too.
I'll be back
 
Aquarius
Agreed. And it's already well-known who's behind the scene. At least if the relevant authorities really wanted to know, they could just follow the money. I mean who can seriously believe a guy in a team with reputed technicians would pay a lot of money to a random foreign gynaecologist (who accidentally provided dope to sportsmen too) just for training advices ?
Or that a now DS would pay money to a haematologist busted several times for the same reason "just training advices" ?

Also, see Di Luca, he gave a couple of names, had his sentence divided by two, started racing again and eventually was busted a third (?) time for the same offence. What good did it do to cleaning the sport ?
 
Kalach
admirschleck wrote:
But, do you really think that someone's going to read 130+ pages, Avin? Why not just linking him the lluuiiiggii's post, which sums up the Sky's situation perfectly, indstead of facepalming? I understand that all of us are bored of these guys and situations (with all respect to these guys), but it's just obvious that he's here for a short time and has no idea what he's talking about, but just fan-boying around.

That was my point, but Ewan (probably) read what lluuiiggii wrote there and he (hopefully) got an unbiased opinon about all of this, now. Smile


On which page can I find that post? Much appreciated!
 
Bikex
Kalach wrote:
admirschleck wrote:
But, do you really think that someone's going to read 130+ pages, Avin? Why not just linking him the lluuiiiggii's post, which sums up the Sky's situation perfectly, indstead of facepalming? I understand that all of us are bored of these guys and situations (with all respect to these guys), but it's just obvious that he's here for a short time and has no idea what he's talking about, but just fan-boying around.

That was my point, but Ewan (probably) read what lluuiiggii wrote there and he (hopefully) got an unbiased opinon about all of this, now. Smile


On which page can I find that post? Much appreciated!


https://pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread....ost_885780
 
Aquarius
There's more now. I haven't seen it surface here yet, so let's get going :

Original source.

Long story short : during last year Tour of Romandie, Chris Froome was authorized by UCI doctor Mario Zorzoli to use an oral corticoide after getting cold.

1) Corticoides can be used as a spray, but absolutely not orally.
2) An AUT is needed, but it can't be delivered by a single doctor, be it the UCI's. A board of expert is needed.
3) Sadly for grandmas there's no such thing as a cold, it's either germs, virus, etc.
4) Froome was so obviously ill that he won the race and the final ITT ahead of world champion Tony Martin

The paper questions the proximity between Sky and the UCI now that a former head of British cycling has become UCI's president.
Edited by Aquarius on 15-06-2014 08:12
 
Shonak
Well, but this has happened last year, where Cookson wasn't UCI president yet. So not sure if the paper can really claim or question anything against Cookson at this point? Of course not sure about what the paper actually writes (ne parle pas francais -funny I actually remember that from class Wink
Looks to me like it's more down to Zorzoli doing what he does best, being corrupt.
Edited by Shonak on 15-06-2014 09:55
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2016/team.png
pcmdaily.com/files/Awards2017/manager.png
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
 
Aquarius
No, it's happened this year (2014), not last year.

WADA is reported to be investigating the matter.
 
Cyanide266
It is also mentioned that Cookson's son works for Sky... That proves that the change of leadership in the UCI changed nothing. The institutions of cycling should be destroyed and rebuilt.
Edited by Cyanide266 on 15-06-2014 12:04
 
Riis123
Lol wtf, that seems weird as heck. A guy from UCI basically allowing Froome to dope?

And how about the spray he used the day he won the mountain stage to Beal? I havent followed the discussion at all, just got curious after that little incident in Romandie.
 
CountArach
https://inrng.com/...ci-froome/

So in reality there is no need for 3 doctors to meet in this particular case and while that doesn't answer all of the other questions and issues with Cookson's conflict of interest that this raises, it does mean it isn't quite as bad as the headline made out.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png Manager of Team Bpost - Vlaanderen i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png

Follow me on Twitter
(All opinions expressed are not guaranteed to reflect reality)
 
Aquarius
CountArach wrote:
https://inrng.com/...ci-froome/

So in reality there is no need for 3 doctors to meet in this particular case and while that doesn't answer all of the other questions and issues with Cookson's conflict of interest that this raises, it does mean it isn't quite as bad as the headline made out.

That.
Rest to see if Zorzoli is a member of the board, but I guess the article sums the questions up quite well.
 
Miguel98
Following Froome's case:

UCI Statement

https://intranet.uci.ch/Modules/ENews/...id=MTAwNDk
 
CountArach
This is a really interesting little note. Taken from Inside Team Sky, Page 72.



i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png Manager of Team Bpost - Vlaanderen i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png

Follow me on Twitter
(All opinions expressed are not guaranteed to reflect reality)
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
The French champion
The French champion
PCM 08: General PCM-screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.42 seconds