|
Sky Doping/Hate Thread
|
| admirschleck |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:11
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6566
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
Aquarius wrote:
EwanWilson wrote:
Sky aren't doped, they are negative, meaning they're clean. Just because they win doesn't make them doped. Imagine if your favorite team came from nowhere and won a shit ton of races, this is just a stupid conspiracy theory spinning around but I think, because its happened before, and people know the consequences, they won't do it. SKY AREN'T DOPED, END OF STORY
Just because someone has his own opinion doesn't allow you to post something like this. That's clearly an insult.
|
| |
|
|
| BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:12
|
Domestique
Posts: 536
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
EwanWilson wrote:
Sky aren't doped, they are negative, meaning they're clean. Just because they win doesn't make them doped. Imagine if your favorite team came from nowhere and won a shit ton of races, this is just a stupid conspiracy theory spinning around but I think, because its happened before, and people know the consequences, they won't do it. SKY AREN'T DOPED, END OF STORY
Always good to get a non-biased, expert opinion on these matters 
|
| |
|
|
| jph27 |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:14
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7374
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
Aquarius wrote:
EwanWilson wrote:
Sky aren't doped, they are negative, meaning they're clean. Just because they win doesn't make them doped. Imagine if your favorite team came from nowhere and won a shit ton of races, this is just a stupid conspiracy theory spinning around but I think, because its happened before, and people know the consequences, they won't do it. SKY AREN'T DOPED, END OF STORY
Just because someone has his own opinion doesn't allow you to post something like this. That's clearly an insult.
Everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it isn't discriminatory towards others. Don't see anything wrong with Aquarius post.
Edited by jph27 on 04-05-2014 22:14
|
| |
|
|
| steve smink |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:15
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 313
Joined: 31-07-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
Thread battle about to begin?
|
| |
|
|
| BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:16
|
Domestique
Posts: 536
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
Aquarius wrote:
EwanWilson wrote:
Sky aren't doped, they are negative, meaning they're clean. Just because they win doesn't make them doped. Imagine if your favorite team came from nowhere and won a shit ton of races, this is just a stupid conspiracy theory spinning around but I think, because its happened before, and people know the consequences, they won't do it. SKY AREN'T DOPED, END OF STORY
Just because someone has his own opinion doesn't allow you to post something like this. That's clearly an insult.
I find it really awkard that you're defending a guy telling his own opinion by personally attacking someone who says his own opinion which is surely not discriminately said. |
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:17
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 17833
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
steve smink wrote:
Thread battle about to begin?
What was the last 138 pages?
Edited by TheManxMissile on 04-05-2014 22:17
|
| |
|
|
| BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:18
|
Domestique
Posts: 536
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
steve smink wrote:
Thread battle about to begin?
What was the last 138 pages?
Nonsense by wannabe Sky-fanboys defending their doped riders. |
| |
|
|
| EwanWilson |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:19
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 980
Joined: 29-12-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
lordbenji33 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
steve smink wrote:
Thread battle about to begin?
What was the last 138 pages?
Nonsense by wannabe Sky-fanboys defending their doped riders.
I have an unbiased conclusion
|
| |
|
|
| BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:20
|
Domestique
Posts: 536
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
EwanWilson wrote:
lordbenji33 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
steve smink wrote:
Thread battle about to begin?
What was the last 138 pages?
Nonsense by wannabe Sky-fanboys defending their doped riders.
I have an unbiased conclusion
This.
Edited by BenjiNaesen on 04-05-2014 22:22
|
| |
|
|
| admirschleck |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:21
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6566
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
jph27 wrote:
Everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it isn't discriminatory towards others. Don't see anything wrong with Aquarius post.
Of course he can show off his opinion and it's not discriminatory one, but it's clearly an attacking insult and that's definitely not welcome here. A 35+ y/o guy behaving like that and saying something like that to 14y/o guy? Really?
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:23
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 17833
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
EwanWilson wrote:
lordbenji33 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
steve smink wrote:
Thread battle about to begin?
What was the last 138 pages?
Nonsense by wannabe Sky-fanboys defending their doped riders.
I have an unbiased conclusion
I wish i could accurately describe my face right now...
Judging by your profile pick i'd say there is at least a little bias floating around
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 06-12-2025 17:21
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:25
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15579
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
EwanWilson wrote:
Imagine if your favorite team came from nowhere and won a shit ton of races, this is just a stupid conspiracy theory spinning around but I think, because its happened before, and people know the consequences, they won't do it.
I...that's sarcasm, right? Because you can't be serious with that explanation why SKY isn't doping. At least give us some proper reasons.
Edited by Shonak on 04-05-2014 22:31
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
|
| jph27 |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:25
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7374
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
jph27 wrote:
Everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it isn't discriminatory towards others. Don't see anything wrong with Aquarius post.
Of course he can show off his opinion and it's not discriminatory one, but it's clearly an attacking insult and that's definitely not welcome here. A 35+ y/o guy behaving like that and saying something like that to 14y/o guy? Really?
If you're old enough to be on the forum, you're old enough to take people disagreeing with you
I can see your point, but I don't see a huge issue. That kind of post isn't unusual, especially in this thread.  |
| |
|
|
| Jesleyh |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:26
|
World Champion
Posts: 14744
Joined: 21-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
No need for personal attacks guys. I mean, really...
Feyenoord(football) and Kelderman fanboy
PCMdaily Awards: 12x nomination, 9x runner-up, 0x win.
|
| |
|
|
| EwanWilson |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:26
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 980
Joined: 29-12-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
EwanWilson wrote:
lordbenji33 wrote:
TheManxMissile wrote:
steve smink wrote:
Thread battle about to begin?
What was the last 138 pages?
Nonsense by wannabe Sky-fanboys defending their doped riders.
I have an unbiased conclusion
I wish i could accurately describe my face right now...
Judging by your profile pick i'd say there is at least a little bias floating around
A bit, but y'know i have an opinion, i thought Dave Millar was doped but I can have my theories and opinions about my favorite teams and riders
|
| |
|
|
| BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:26
|
Domestique
Posts: 536
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
admirschleck wrote:
jph27 wrote:
Everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it isn't discriminatory towards others. Don't see anything wrong with Aquarius post.
Of course he can show off his opinion and it's not discriminatory one, but it's clearly an attacking insult and that's definitely not welcome here. A 35+ y/o guy behaving like that and saying something like that to 14y/o guy? Really?
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:27
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 17833
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
No need for personal attacks guys. I mean, really...
KELDERMAN'S ON DRUGS!!
...
...
now who said that?
|
| |
|
|
| BenjiNaesen |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:28
|
Domestique
Posts: 536
Joined: 09-03-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
No need for personal attacks guys. I mean, really...
WE DONT DO PERSONAL ATTACKS!!!!
|
| |
|
|
| jph27 |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:29
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7374
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
Jesleyh wrote:
No need for personal attacks guys. I mean, really...
Aren't you needed at the Kelderman temple? 
But yeah, keep things on topic and friendly everyone. I'm sure no offence was meant |
| |
|
|
| admirschleck |
Posted on 04-05-2014 22:31
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6566
Joined: 11-10-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
jph27 wrote:
admirschleck wrote:
jph27 wrote:
Everyone's entitled to their opinion as long as it isn't discriminatory towards others. Don't see anything wrong with Aquarius post.
Of course he can show off his opinion and it's not discriminatory one, but it's clearly an attacking insult and that's definitely not welcome here. A 35+ y/o guy behaving like that and saying something like that to 14y/o guy? Really?
If you're old enough to be on the forum, you're old enough to take people disagreeing with you
I can see your point, but I don't see a huge issue. That kind of post isn't unusual, especially in this thread.
Disagreeing ≠Insulting. Of course, that Ewan's post is just ridiculous, these are not even a proper reasons and it's really funny, but everyone should have his own opinion and everyone should respect it. At least that's the idea that you, West, is propagating (I guess).
|
| |
|
