PCM.daily banner
24-11-2024 18:39
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 86

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,803
· Newest Member: actronspareparts
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Giro d'Italia 2010
CrueTrue
ruben wrote:
So 100 riders in this Giro, including almost all the top 10, bar Porte, Kiserlovski and Arroyo, made a mistake?

Funny.



They did make a mistake, yes.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
doddy13
CrueTrue wrote:
ruben wrote:
So 100 riders in this Giro, including almost all the top 10, bar Porte, Kiserlovski and Arroyo, made a mistake?

Funny.



They did make a mistake, yes.


This exactly.
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
Roman
doddy13 wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
ruben wrote:
So 100 riders in this Giro, including almost all the top 10, bar Porte, Kiserlovski and Arroyo, made a mistake?

Funny.



They did make a mistake, yes.


This exactly.


Yep, exactly.
Manager of Moser - Sygic
 
SportingNonsense
ruben wrote:
So 100 riders in this Giro, including almost all the top 10, bar Porte, Kiserlovski and Arroyo, made a mistake?

Funny.



Youre saying that at least 100 riders in the Giro were going for GC, or specifically wanted to win that stage?

Of all riders, Mollemma is the one who turned out to have made the biggest mistake. He doesnt get the white jersey because of it.

Liquigas didnt make a mistake. Basso wins the Giro regardless, and Kiserlovski could be set for a Top 10 GC placing - and would also have taken the Young Riders jersey has Porte not done so well (and at the time, there was no guarantee that Porte would do aswell as he has done)
farm8.staticflickr.com/7458/9357923136_f1e68270f3_n.jpg
 
lup_andrei
Glad to see Cadel trying something today, I've thought he will be almost dead after yesterday's stage. He ends the tour with 1 stage victory (montalcino), 3 runner-up spots (zoncolan, kronplatz and today) and the red jersey with one more stage to go. But still, disappointing, for me at least. Happy for aussies Porte, Lloyd who finally conquered there jerseys today, as Cadel did with the red one. Tomorrow I expect Brad to take the stage and Cadel another 2nd place :lol:
Edited by lup_andrei on 29-05-2010 17:50
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 24-11-2024 18:39
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
ruben
SportingNonsense wrote:
ruben wrote:
So 100 riders in this Giro, including almost all the top 10, bar Porte, Kiserlovski and Arroyo, made a mistake?

Funny.



Youre saying that at least 100 riders in the Giro were going for GC, or specifically wanted to win that stage?

Of all riders, Mollemma is the one who turned out to have made the biggest mistake. He doesnt get the white jersey because of it.

Liquigas didnt make a mistake. Basso wins the Giro regardless, and Kiserlovski could be set for a Top 10 GC placing - and would also have taken the Young Riders jersey has Porte not done so well (and at the time, there was no guarantee that Porte would do aswell as he has done)
Kiserlovski was also in that break

But really, is it so hard to admit Mollema was a better climber than Porte in this Giro?
Edited by ruben on 29-05-2010 18:31
 
Rinhoth
yah, he was in the break, so he got a top ten, therefore it was an advantage for liquigas that the break went in.
If children have the ability to ignore all odds and percentages, then maybe we can all learn from them. When you think about it, what other choice is there but to hope? We have two options, medically and emotionally: give up, or Fight Like Hell.
-Lance Armstrong
www.player-art.com/gallery/content/Signatures/Soccer/cesc_by_sg-style.JPG
 
marble
Liquigas was riding hard to not let the gap be too big. In the end Liquigas would probably have had a 1-2 in the GC instead of 1st, 3rd and 9th place. They could also have been saving alot of energy instead of attacking 50km from the finish line to earn as much time as possible on Arroyo on every stage.

I think a 2nd place overall instead of 3rd for Nibali would be better than a 9th place and 2nd in the young rider classification for Kiserlovski.
 
Roman
ruben wrote:
But really, is it so hard to admit Mollema was a better climber than Porte in this Giro?
Mollema maybe was better climber than Porte but Grand Tours aren't only about climbing. If you take off the break, Porte and Mollema have both practically same overall time. So I think Mollema wasn't better in this Giro without break too. Wink
Manager of Moser - Sygic
 
ruben
Noi Roman, not maybe.
He was DEFINATELY, the better climber. Porte lost time on Mollema in 4 of the 7 mountain stages. He won time on 1, Kronplatz (which was on Mollema's worst day after illness). So it's very very clear who the better climber is
 
ruben
Roman wrote:
ruben wrote:
But really, is it so hard to admit Mollema was a better climber than Porte in this Giro?
Mollema maybe was better climber than Porte but Grand Tours aren't only about climbing. If you take off the break, Porte and Mollema have both practically same overall time. So I think Mollema wasn't better in this Giro without break too. Wink


The difference is 11'40
The break was 12'30 ahead.

Also, Porte won 3 minutes in Holland because of the falls
So that's 15'30 Porte won in non-mountain stages.

11'40 - 15'30 =?

Do the math
 
Bosskardo
ruben wrote:

Do the math


Math: Mollema had shitty luck and bad judgements, boo hoo, thats life
i832.photobucket.com/albums/zz249/PCMkardo/TranscodedWallpaper.jpg
 
CrueTrue
ruben wrote:
SportingNonsense wrote:
ruben wrote:
So 100 riders in this Giro, including almost all the top 10, bar Porte, Kiserlovski and Arroyo, made a mistake?

Funny.



Youre saying that at least 100 riders in the Giro were going for GC, or specifically wanted to win that stage?

Of all riders, Mollemma is the one who turned out to have made the biggest mistake. He doesnt get the white jersey because of it.

Liquigas didnt make a mistake. Basso wins the Giro regardless, and Kiserlovski could be set for a Top 10 GC placing - and would also have taken the Young Riders jersey has Porte not done so well (and at the time, there was no guarantee that Porte would do aswell as he has done)
Kiserlovski was also in that break

But really, is it so hard to admit Mollema was a better climber than Porte in this Giro?


I don't know about everyone else, but I don't think that it's been contested that Mollema has been a better climber than Porte.
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
BouBBox
Being the strongest isn't allways enough in GTs, race science is also very important.
Team Europcar !!

RIP Wouter

www.cyclingbase.com/photos/W/weylandt.jpg
 
ruben
I still think Porte is a one-day fly concerning GT's.

He'll be more of a time trial specialist in the future.
He reminds me of McGee who also got a great Giro placing once.
Edited by ruben on 29-05-2010 19:45
 
Roman
Ok, Ruben, Mollema was better climber, I agree with you. But I say that mountains aren't everything in GTs. In overall Porte was waaaay better than Mollema. Mollema had maybe some bad luck but definetly some bad judgements which costed him a place in top 10. It's the fact, for you bad fact, but it's reality.
Anyway for example, tomorrow will be there time trial, the race against the truth, so we'll see if Mollema or Porte is better "complete" rider. Pfft
Manager of Moser - Sygic
 
Roman
ruben wrote:
I still think Porte is a one-day fly concerning GT's.

He'll be more of a time trial specialist in the future.
He reminds me of McGee who also got a great Giro placing once.

So why Mollema should be better rider in GTs than Porte in future? Mollema gained only 4 mins to Porte, which really isn't that much. Only future will say that. But yes this your thinking is one of the possibilities, which maybe more likely should happen.
Manager of Moser - Sygic
 
doddy13
Roman wrote:
Ok, Ruben, Mollema was better climber, I agree with you. But I say that mountains aren't everything in GTs. In overall Porte was waaaay better than Mollema. Mollema had maybe some bad luck but definetly some bad judgements which costed him a place in top 10. It's the fact, for you bad fact, but it's reality.
Anyway for example, tomorrow will be there time trial, the race against the truth, so we'll see if Mollema or Porte is better "complete" rider. Pfft


Reminds me of something Graham Jones on the tour series said last night

"A climber has to do the flat stages, and a sprinter has to do the mountains, thats Bike racing."
There's no point slapping a schleck - Sean Kelly on "Who needs a slap"
 
issoisso
Mollema and Porte were both very good.

But all things considered, Kiserlovski seems amazingly promising.

EDIT: By the way, I'll be amazed if Wiggford doesn't win tomorrow.
Edited by issoisso on 29-05-2010 19:58
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Gustavovskiy
I agree with ruben, I don't think Porte is as promising (GT-wise) as Mollema or Kiserlovski. This is the first time he's ever shown anything, at lest in the mountains. Anyway I think he was the most surprising rider of those 3.
Manager of pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2024/Micros/eve.png Everesting pcmdaily.com/images/mg/2024/Micros/eve.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Results before the finish line
Results before the finish line
PCM10: Funny screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.35 seconds