PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 10:41
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 60

· Members Online: 3
redordead, Ollfardh, jaxika

· Total Members: 161,811
· Newest Member: eganyu
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
News in November
whitejersey
It's the other way around, Gasparotto is going to the tour and Brajkovicto the Giro Wink
 
Ian Butler
Oh yeah, sorry, must've read it wrong, Smile
 
Montolivo
Also Andrea Guardini will ride the Tour. Gasparotto will go for Tour stage wins.
 
Aquarius
That's not really news, but I've found it interesting nonetheless.
Fred Grappe (FDJeux's trainer and "Watts specialist" ) voiced a brilliant idea on twitter.

Besides the biological passport, that only accounts biological data (d'oh), he said that a relatively cheap thing to do would be to have a "personalised power profile". A mere document that would say how much power each rider can produce during certain amounts of time. 1 minute, 4 minutes, 20, 60, 140 or 360, etc.
Huge variations are unlikely to happen, at least not for natural reasons.
Using those data, and cross-checking them with what riders achieve in races would make it possible to classify their performances as "deceiving", "normal", "above expected", "suspicious", "highly suspicious", "totally unnatural", etc. He didn't use these words, at least not all of them, but you get the idea.

Some riders who doped specifically for one race (Tour de France, namely) gained more than 50 W in one month. That cannot happen naturally.

Of course weight and motivation play a part, but there are limits to everything, plus weight can be checked quite easily.
Edited by Aquarius on 26-11-2012 21:56
 
CountArach
Sounds like a great idea and realistically a lot of teams have access to them power outputs already. Which, now that I think about it means that claiming that they don't know a rider is doping, or even suspecting it, is really quite impossible.
i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png Manager of Team Bpost - Vlaanderen i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq112/Gustavovskiy/microjerseys/PCT/bps_zps2b426596.png

Follow me on Twitter
(All opinions expressed are not guaranteed to reflect reality)
 
issoisso
CountArach wrote:
Sounds like a great idea and realistically a lot of teams have access to them power outputs already. Which, now that I think about it means that claiming that they don't know a rider is doping, or even suspecting it, is really quite impossible.


Meh, recorded data doesn't tell you the whole story.
Just ask Jonathan Vaughters:

A high vo2 max does not make a great rider. I had a very high vo2. Higher than Bernard Hinaults, almost certainly. He was great, I was mediocre. Why? because while in a limited 30 minute laboratory test, i could reach very high points of shifting oxygen. He could do 95% of that for 6 hours on the road. I was a car with very big engine with a small gas tank and a driver with bad depth perception.

(...)

btw - vo2 max is not a great indicator of ability. We don't test for it. We use a test that steps up every 10 minutes, from power level to power level. You never reach vo2 max with such long/fatiguing intervals. We measure v02 , but it never gets to max before the rider fails. This test is, however, a great indicator of on road performance, because it lasts an hour and a half and is very tough the whole time. The guys hate it.

This type of testing is more aligned with how your body adapts to and tolerates acidity. Which is far more interesting than v02 max.

The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified

i.imgur.com/YWVAnoO.jpg

"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 10:41
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
rjc_43
Aquarius wrote:
Of course weight and motivation play a part, but there are limits to everything, plus weight can be checked quite easily.


And of course, weight, as it goes down, can often impact absolute power output - sometimes it will go down due to a loss in a bit of power from loss of muscle mass. At the same time, as the rider comes into a peak, their absolute power will increase slightly.

A power meter will only ever measure absolute power. Which doesn't take into account weight of a rider.

Relative power output is comparing absolute against rider weight. This will change the most over a season.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk]imageprocessor.websimages.com/width/420/www.cleavercycling.co.uk/CleaverCyclingWebHeader.png[/url]
 
http://cleavercycling.co.uk
Ian Butler
Contador raises his voice for a non-tolerance for doping.

Thomas De Gendt will start in the Tour Down Under. He likes to race there and it'd be nice to grab some points for the team.

O'Grady will try to break Hincapie's record of participations in the Tour. He'll try to race two more.

Hushovd is feeling good again after a bad season and is on schedule for next year!
Edited by Ian Butler on 27-11-2012 12:45
 
sutty68
Apparently Tyler Hamilton, speaking on Sky Sports this morning says he has more revelations that will shock the World of cycling Frown
 
SSJ2Luigi
sutty68 wrote:
Apparently Tyler Hamilton, speaking on Sky Sports this morning says he has more revelations that will shock the World of cycling Frown

like that is something we want Sad
 
sutty68
SSJ2Luigi wrote:
sutty68 wrote:
Apparently Tyler Hamilton, speaking on Sky Sports this morning says he has more revelations that will shock the World of cycling Frown

like that is something we want Sad


Exactly Sad
 
Wilier
Well I want it. I want every cheater caught.
Edited by Wilier on 27-11-2012 14:50
 
kumazan
issoisso wrote:
CountArach wrote:
Sounds like a great idea and realistically a lot of teams have access to them power outputs already. Which, now that I think about it means that claiming that they don't know a rider is doping, or even suspecting it, is really quite impossible.


Meh, recorded data doesn't tell you the whole story.
Just ask Jonathan Vaughters:


But we're talking about power thresholds here, not VO2max or other physiological data. It could be a decent tool for selective testing, as a complement for the bio passport.
Edited by kumazan on 27-11-2012 14:57
 
Avin Wargunnson
Wilier wrote:
Well I want it. I want every cheater caught.

Me too, rather hear the truth (if that is what Hamilton brings us), than live in sweet lies.
I'll be back
 
Aquarius
kumazan wrote:
issoisso wrote:
CountArach wrote:
Sounds like a great idea and realistically a lot of teams have access to them power outputs already. Which, now that I think about it means that claiming that they don't know a rider is doping, or even suspecting it, is really quite impossible.


Meh, recorded data doesn't tell you the whole story.
Just ask Jonathan Vaughters:


But we're talking about power thresholds here, not VO2max or other physiological data. It could be a decent tool for selective testing, as a complement for the bio passport.

This. V02 max is more or less equivalent to the power one can sustain during 3 or 4 minutes, maybe 5 but not more. Typically a pursuiter thing.
That's not the most relevant parameter for a pro road cyclist. At least it's far from being the only one.
That's why Grappe suggests that this would be recorded among other parameters, like power over 20 minutes, 45 minutes, one hour, four or six hours.
On the last two ones Hinault would own Vaughters, but thing that's only relevant when you compare different riders. One rider values won't fluctuate too much during one season. A sudden increase in performance would hint at a cheating of some sort.
 
manindemaan
A Dutch sports magazine (AD sportwereld) investigated doping among 50 Dutch cyclists from the period between 1998 and 2005. On asking whether they doped most of them answered 'no', one did not answer, and - showing that there are no dopers - no one said yes.
Case solved. Amen.

More interesting, some peoples' reactions:
- Bram Tankink (and some others) wondered whether they expect anyone to confirm doping that way.
- Aart Vierhouten (ex lotto) had to think about the question for a few days, then denied.
- Johan Bruinsma ('no'Wink told he had informed himself about doping towards the end of his career and was shocked he could have got some anabolics simply from the doctor
- Davy Dubbeldam (ex-TVM) said "I could say no but I wouldn't feel well doing so. That this answer would raise doubt? Then be it that way."
- Gerben Löwik: 'no, therefore I'm in the furniture business now'
 
sutty68
Avin Wargunnson wrote:
Wilier wrote:
Well I want it. I want every cheater caught.

Me too, rather hear the truth (if that is what Hamilton brings us), than live in sweet lies.


I wonder who will be next on the hit list Wink
 
Ian Butler
Please not Danny Pate Frown Pfft
 
Avin Wargunnson
Ian Butler wrote:
Please not Danny Pate Frown Pfft

Dont be fool, he is a natural born killer. Cool
I'll be back
 
FreitasPCM
Anyone knows when UCI will reveal the list of World Tour and Pro-Conti teams?
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
In the Fog
In the Fog
PCM15: Beautiful Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.29 seconds