MichelinR wrote:
And Dekker wins in my carreer Paris Nice so his stats are good. 
Paris-Nice has nothing to do with the high mountains. And my point was the comparison between him and Ten Dam.
MichelinR wrote:
Zubeldia is not so good in time trial like for some years.
I never said he was
MichelinR wrote:
Best time trial results:
2007: 20th at last TdF time trial
2006: 28th at last TdF time trial, 7th in Tour de Romandie prologue (but it's a prologue, days form is more important)
2005: nothing
2004: nothing
And Hoste wins time trial
again, you're missing my point: seven points difference? that's about 3:30 in a 50km TT. And the difference between them is a lot smaller than that. 3-4 points, sure. but 7?
The point with my previous post was that I think the stats aren't very well built. I couldn't care less if a rider has 60 or 75 for one stat. it's how all his stats relate to the other riders' stats. The difference has to work. and after playing a couple of stages, I can see it doesn't work.
Aside from the stats, I see very few bugs with the DB. just a few switched pictures and the fact that the Tour's stages have so many graphical stuff they make my PC crash. I like the rest
Edited by issoisso on 02-03-2008 18:00
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
