I read that diagonally, then looked at the picture and saw a picture of a blond guy holding a tennis racquet.
"What the...? Boris Becker? London? Is Crommy high?"
I need to start switching my brain on before coming in here
Edited by issoisso on 03-05-2008 21:55
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
Boris Becker would probably be better at running London than Boris Johnson
For those of you don't know the wonderful person that is Boris Johnson, he is a Conservative politican, who is famous for being a complete buffoon. He's an idiot, he says the most random things, and just happens to be hilarious as he acts like an idiot
that's an interesting tackle....headbutt to the nuts
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
I watched that charity match with Boris. It was the 1st time I'd heard of him. It was a beautiful tackle (especially against the Germans, who were taking the match very seriously ) Because no-one I know, knows anything about politics, that's the only thing we know him for
Edited by Addy291 on 04-05-2008 13:12
So the israeli air force conducted a simulation of a strike in preparation to attacks on iranian facilities. The attack is expected to (for political reasons) in no way ever occur before the end of american elections, otherwise they might not have the inconditional support of american media, however it's expected to occur before the next american president actually takes to power.
Iranians have already, as usual, ranted that they will crush all invaders, yadda yadda, etc.
Israeli government have no qualms about admitting they will use nuclear weapons if a full war erupts.
Can't say this wasn't coming sooner or later. Mentalities like those of the Israeli and Pakistani peoples will lead to nuclear war sooner or later.
And the world we live in right now will be seen retroactively as a paradise...
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
relative peace for 60 years is pretty good. Also North Korea have finally realised that food is more important than nukes, so they should be peaceful. Also I expect the war to remain in the middle east so I doubt it will be as bad as the World Wars.
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182]Team Santander Media Thread[/url]
mb2612 wrote:
Sorry but I don't see why a nuclear war should never happen
Let's set aside the devastation and the horrors of nuclear war that will kill people of deformities and make all land uninhabitable for centuries to come, because apparently that doesn't scare you enough.
Everyone has allies. when it starts between two countries, each will pull it's allies in. Those allies will pull it's allies. and so on.
every country will be in it. it will be full scale planetary nuclear war. and I guarantee it'll be the last world war humanity will ever wage. and not in a good way.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
You misunderstand, I have no doubt that, in general, a nuclear war would be a bad thing. And yes I don't really want the earth to be a wasteland. However there could be times where a nuclear war can be justified.
Also you say every country will be in it, however, once major countries start chucking nukes around many minor countries without nukes will suddenly become very neutral. Also as only 10 or so countries have a great deal of nuclear weapons they will be very careful not to attack one another.
i.e. I can see the US or Israel nuking Iran but I cant see China, France or Russia taking enough offense to nuke the US back
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182]Team Santander Media Thread[/url]
mb2612 wrote:
there could be times where a nuclear war can be justified.
are you american?
mb2612 wrote:
Also you say every country will be in it, however, once major countries start chucking nukes around many minor countries without nukes will suddenly become very neutral. Also as only 10 or so countries have a great deal of nuclear weapons they will be very careful not to attack one another.
I meant all with nuclear arsenals. I apologise if it wasn't as obvious as I thought it was.
mb2612 wrote:
i.e. I can see the US or Israel nuking Iran but I cant see China, France or Russia taking enough offense to nuke the US back
it won't start with any of those countries. After the end of the cold war, a gigantic number of soviet nuclear specialists and material suddenly were free and available on the black market. These days even a corporation can have their own nuclear program, provided they have enough money. And all it takes is one single maniac pushing a button.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
No I am not American, and I am highly offended by that comment.
I agree with you that the most likely form of nuclear attack in is a terrorist attack. However this is surely contradictory to your point that this would cause a nuclear war as I doubt countries would start fighting one another with nukes over a terrorist attack.
[url=www.pcmdaily.com/forum/viewthread.php?thread_id=33182]Team Santander Media Thread[/url]