TheManxMissile wrote:


For f*cks sake... last time i'm going to say this:

Christopher Clive Froome, FAILED an official drugs test. Not only did he fail, he failed by quite litterally 100%. He was double the allowed limit on Salbutamol. Double.
There is no previously existing evidence that can explain that high a level of Salbutamol to natural or accidental causes. None.

Salbutamol however can be excused to a level with a TUE. A level Chris Froome has doubled. He's exceeded the allowed limit by 100%. But because of Salbutamol's classification under WADA rules it does not give an automatic suspension like EPO would.
Froome is allowed to try and present a case explaining how he was double the allowed limit and prove it was not intentional doping. He can try, but as said there's no existing evidence that can explain being double the allowed limit.

Is that clear enough?
Chris Froome failed a drugs test, massively failed. Completely failed. Not even close to passing.
Just read almost all of my previous posts on the topic, i've explained it multiple times as clearly as possible.