|
2010 World Cup South Africa
|
| filmmaker14 |
Posted on 28-06-2010 18:34
|
Stagiare
Posts: 236
Joined: 29-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
Sorry but I hate that idea. Challenges belong on the other side of the Atlantic. Not in this game.
What's the argument?
What I wrote yesterday.
So basicly that it's anti-climactic. lol
Mexico-Argentina was one huge anti-climax. |
| |
|
|
| Roo |
Posted on 28-06-2010 18:43
|
Stagiare
Posts: 236
Joined: 15-04-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
Sorry but I hate that idea. Challenges belong on the other side of the Atlantic. Not in this game.
What's the argument?
What I wrote yesterday.
Chips in the ball are the way forward. No need for reviewing video material |
| |
|
|
| ringo182 |
Posted on 28-06-2010 18:47
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
Roo wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
Sorry but I hate that idea. Challenges belong on the other side of the Atlantic. Not in this game.
What's the argument?
What I wrote yesterday.
Chips in the ball are the way forward. No need for reviewing video material
but chips in the ball won't stop blatently obvious mistakes like Tevez's goal. |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 28-06-2010 18:56
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
Sorry but I hate that idea. Challenges belong on the other side of the Atlantic. Not in this game.
What's the argument?
What I wrote yesterday.
To which I replied:
My counter-argument to what you said is that you do spend 3-5 minutes discussing with the players anyway. If you saw the Mex-Arg match, you would notice that they were discussing with the linesman for a long period of time. That's what always happens when a decision is obviously wrong. Instead of discussing for 3-5 minutes, where the refs see their wrong decisions being played on the big screen, but without possibility to change their decisions, why not allow a video review? |
| |
|
|
| kumazan |
Posted on 28-06-2010 19:03
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 02-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
There's no need to discuss actually. Just have a fragging couple of people watching the game, and when the referee make a mistake, they warn him.
My concern about this is:
1) It'd create a problem if a referee calls an offside which isn't actually an offside
2) It'd be only enforceable in the top echelon of the sport. |
| |
|
|
| ember |
Posted on 28-06-2010 20:07
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6849
Joined: 27-03-2008
PCM$: 700.00
|
That was a pity.
Now Brazil can do what they are best at, defend and counterattack.
EDIT: And there the second came  On the counter 
Edited by ember on 28-06-2010 20:08
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 07:36
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 28-06-2010 20:53
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Brazil counters to 3-0 against the over-attacking Chile.
|
| |
|
|
| Juan |
Posted on 29-06-2010 07:47
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1282
Joined: 09-12-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Technology? Not for me, because it takes away what football is about.
Football is for people who play with cunning...so to put technology like a chip in the ball to see if it went in...I think you take away the cunning and then football ends for the great players.
Football is for the cunning, not for technology.
dixit Sergio Romero
Edited by Juan on 29-06-2010 07:47
|
| |
|
|
| ringo182 |
Posted on 29-06-2010 09:56
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
Juan wrote:
Technology? Not for me, because it takes away what football is about.
Football is for people who play with cunning...so to put technology like a chip in the ball to see if it went in...I think you take away the cunning and then football ends for the great players.
Football is for the cunning, not for technology.
dixit Sergio Romero
is that cunning or cheating? there's nothing cunning about a goal being disallowed when it's a yard over the line. Or about Tevez being 2 yards offside. Or an ivory coast player running into Kaka and then faking convulsions on the floor.
not saying the first 2 were cheating, they were just blatent mistakes. but again there was no cunning involved. |
| |
|
|
| TheHelpfulDevil |
Posted on 29-06-2010 11:18
|
Amateur
Posts: 21
Joined: 28-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
big fan of the chile team - was a shame they could have not got a goal. they play footbal in the style i like. Attack attack attack if lose the ball hack hack hack! |
| |
|
|
| Juan |
Posted on 29-06-2010 11:29
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1282
Joined: 09-12-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
ringo182 wrote:
Juan wrote:
Technology? Not for me, because it takes away what football is about.
Football is for people who play with cunning...so to put technology like a chip in the ball to see if it went in...I think you take away the cunning and then football ends for the great players.
Football is for the cunning, not for technology.
dixit Sergio Romero
is that cunning or cheating? there's nothing cunning about a goal being disallowed when it's a yard over the line. Or about Tevez being 2 yards offside. Or an ivory coast player running into Kaka and then faking convulsions on the floor.
not saying the first 2 were cheating, they were just blatent mistakes. but again there was no cunning involved.
Well, that's a matter of word.
Besides, I was just quoting what Romero said 
But, of course, if Argentina had been cheated, then he wouldn't have said that.
|
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 29-06-2010 14:40
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22246
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
The FIFA thinks about a suspension of France because the intervention of the state.
I can`t really imagine that this will happen but it would be a big thing.
Edited by roturn on 29-06-2010 14:41
|
| |
|
|
| Bosskardo |
Posted on 29-06-2010 18:18
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1559
Joined: 07-04-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Beleg32 wrote:
Japan lost in penalties, another South America team in quaterfinal. Well done Paraguay 
Not well done at all. Awful game.
|
| |
|
|
| kumazan |
Posted on 29-06-2010 18:21
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 02-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well done in the penalties. It was the only thing both teams tried in the whole game. They could have gone directly to the penalty shootout. |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 29-06-2010 19:35
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Pretty awful match. Both teams were too scared of losing ... so moving on: Spain - Portugal |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 29-06-2010 19:54
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Heh. funny. Entirely spanish-speaking refereeing team, but Portugal getting the calls, so far.
Coentrão's penalty not given, Ronaldo's foul over Casillas not given.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| diouf |
Posted on 29-06-2010 20:34
|
Under 23
Posts: 62
Joined: 03-02-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yet again, the spanish are facing the same problems as i wrote about earlier. Not enough width with Iniesta and David Villa on the wings and the backs not getting enough forward, no deep runs because all the three central midtfielders want the ball at feet and that means Portugals two central defenders and three central midtfielders can shout down Spain.
Fabregas would make the biggest difference if he's just remotely in shape. He should replace Xabi Alonso. And if that's not enough Jesus Navas could replace Torres and move Iniesta left and Villa central. |
| |
|
|
| niconico |
Posted on 29-06-2010 20:37
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4102
Joined: 09-07-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
A_Schleck wrote:
Sorry but I hate that idea. Challenges belong on the other side of the Atlantic. Not in this game.
What's the argument?
What I wrote yesterday.
To which I replied:
My counter-argument to what you said is that you do spend 3-5 minutes discussing with the players anyway. If you saw the Mex-Arg match, you would notice that they were discussing with the linesman for a long period of time. That's what always happens when a decision is obviously wrong. Instead of discussing for 3-5 minutes, where the refs see their wrong decisions being played on the big screen, but without possibility to change their decisions, why not allow a video review?
Of course they discuss with the referee. They just had a very bad call against them, of course they're gonna discuss it with the ref.
But there's no way they change a call when first made. So the discussing is just frustrations and not helping in any way to get the call reversed, it just can't be done. That being said it's of course a shame things like this happen.
But again the linesman should always be able to see that. It's his job after all.
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 29-06-2010 20:38
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I have to say Queiroz has done a marvellous job shutting down Spain so far.
Especially Costa at fullback to negate Villa's space may have the been obvious choice, but that doesn't change the fact that it's worked a treat.
Still can't score, though.
As for Spain, same as usual: No width from midfield, no runs from midfield, little overlap from the fullbacks.
Whoever gets lucky is going to win this.
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
| |
|
|
| felix_29 |
Posted on 29-06-2010 20:54
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3054
Joined: 08-08-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
And 1:0 for Spain, of course Villa. They will not win any match without him
|
| |
|
