PCM.daily banner
25-11-2024 07:25
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 74

· Members Online: 1
Ezeefreak

· Total Members: 161,807
· Newest Member: bridal8789
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Football
 Print Thread
2010 World Cup South Africa
ringo182
in the biggest sporting tournament in the world, half of the second round games have been decided by major refereeing errors at a crucial time that would both have been ruled out with technology.

2 countries are going home because one man is too arrogant to put a camera in the goal. Blater should step down after the world cup. he is the one thing holding the sport back.

it wouldn't slow the game down at all. give each team 3 appeals per game. it takes seconds to view video evidence but minutes to calm down a team that knows it has been robbed.

every single person in that stadium last night knew that tevez's goal shouldn't have counted yet the referee didn't have the balls to do anything about it. why couldn't he change his mind and do the right thing?

 
Lorkan
ruben wrote:
I'm not talking about normal mistakes, this was a blunder.

And world class goalies don't make blunders at world cups.


I don't think I told "world class" gk, I didn't call him Buffon, Schmeichel or Van der Sar... (and those all made at least one mistake in a WC, don't ask me which, I won't take time to find them, but every gk, even "world class" gk make some) but Neuer is still an excellent goalkeeper, I think a lot of clubs and nations would like to have him...
 
ruben
Vd Sar never made a mistake at the world cup. He lost some penalty shoot-outs, but that isn't a mistake
I can't remember Schmeichel ever making a mistake at a big tournament either
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 25-11-2024 07:25
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
ringo182
i think ruben is talking about the difference between mistakes, like rob greens against USA.

and simple errors in judgement like constantly coming for crosses and missing the ball or punching instead of catching.

all goalies make mistakes. but world class ones make less because they don't make errors in judgement.

a world class keeper knows exactly where his post are, when to claim a catch or when to leave it, when to rush out and when to stay on his line.

Germany wouldn't have scored their first goal yesterday if James had been a world class keeper and came off his line to claim the ball straight away.

every keeper in the world is a good shot stopper, otherwise you wouldn't be a keeper. the difference in world class keepers is they can command their area and know when to come out and when to stay etc.
Edited by ringo182 on 28-06-2010 09:27
 
ruben
Excactly

Anyway, line up Netherlands is known

GK: Stekelenburg
DR: Van der Wiel
DC: Heitinga
DC: Mathijssen
DL: Van Bronckhorst
DM: Van Bommel
DM: De Jong
LM: Kuyty
RM: Robben
AM: Sneijder
SC: Van Persie

So Robben in the starting line up, at the right, Kuyt moved to the left. Vd Vaart out with injury, but frankly, that's ok.
 
filmmaker14
ruben wrote:
So Robben in the starting line up, at the right, Kuyt moved to the left. Vd Vaart out with injury, but frankly, that's ok.

Actually that's great news. Worst player on our team. Not just out of position.
I hope his injury takes three weeks to heal.
Edited by filmmaker14 on 28-06-2010 14:03
 
filmmaker14
ruben wrote:
He lost some penalty shoot-outs, but that isn't a mistake

It's not a lottery either. V.d.Sar should have learned to stop penalties much earlier in his career. For years his decision making on penalties was abysmal. It was his worst attribute, I think.
 
Juan
ringo182 wrote:
2 countries are going home because one man is too arrogant to put a camera in the goal.

So, you're like billions of persons who likes rewriting History. Argentina wouldn't have scored, and so they wouldn't have won the game for sure Rolling Eyes

As for England, they played the match so bad tactically, that they can only blame themselves.

ringo182 wrote:
give each team 3 appeals per game.

So, when a team has spent its 3 challenges, and there's a goal scored with an off-side, then what do you do ? That'd raise even more discussions, and so on...
I'm not basically speaking against video review, but I don't really see how it could be used in the best way.
It could be really helpful for a goal in-goal out situation, but do you use video review on every off-side that's suspicious ?
heberger-image.fr/data/images/58302_Signature.png
 
bfreire
ruben wrote:
Excactly

Anyway, line up Netherlands is known

GK: Stekelenburg
DR: Van der Wiel
DC: Heitinga
DC: Mathijssen
DL: Van Bronckhorst
DM: Van Bommel
DM: De Jong
LM: Kuyty
RM: Robben
AM: Sneijder
SC: Van Persie

So Robben in the starting line up, at the right, Kuyt moved to the left. Vd Vaart out with injury, but frankly, that's ok.


Let Elia play instead of robben , he need his rest
i51.tinypic.com/28i2ty0.png
 
ringo182
Juan wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
2 countries are going home because one man is too arrogant to put a camera in the goal.

So, you're like billions of persons who likes rewriting History. Argentina wouldn't have scored, and so they wouldn't have won the game for sure Rolling Eyes

As for England, they played the match so bad tactically, that they can only blame themselves.



so your saying that both games would have ended the same way if both mistakes hadn't been made?

so if England had gone in 2-2 at the break they would have still gone all out in the second and got caught on the break twice?

If Mexico hadn't been cheated they would still have lost their heads abit and given away a sloppy second goal?

I'm not saying the results would have been different, but you can't say they had no effect. Both mistakes had a huge effect on the overall result and pretty much sent England and Mexico out of the World Cup.

yes England played badly but at the point when the "second goal" went in we were the better team and had Germany on the back foot.

How you can say any different is beyond me and your simply wrong.
 
kumazan
Juan wrote:
So, you're like billions of persons who likes rewriting History. Argentina wouldn't have scored, and so they wouldn't have won the game for sure Rolling Eyes

As for England, they played the match so bad tactically, that they can only blame themselves.



Both matches would have been different had the referees taken the correct decision. That doesn't mean that it's sure that England and Mexico would have gone through to the next round, though, but it'd have been different, that's for sure.
 
filmmaker14
Juan wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
2 countries are going home because one man is too arrogant to put a camera in the goal.

So, you're like billions of persons who likes rewriting History. Argentina wouldn't have scored, and so they wouldn't have won the game for sure Rolling Eyes

Mexico outplayed Argentina before the goal. And after the goal they lost it. Second goal may not have happened like that when it's still 0-0.

Has nothing to do with rewriting history. Got something to do with getting it right the first time.
 
Juan
ringo182 wrote:
Juan wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
2 countries are going home because one man is too arrogant to put a camera in the goal.

So, you're like billions of persons who likes rewriting History. Argentina wouldn't have scored, and so they wouldn't have won the game for sure Rolling Eyes

As for England, they played the match so bad tactically, that they can only blame themselves.



so your saying that both games would have ended the same way if both mistakes hadn't been made?

so if England had gone in 2-2 at the break they would have still gone all out in the second and got caught on the break twice?

If Mexico hadn't been cheated they would still have lost their heads abit and given away a sloppy second goal?

I'm not saying the results would have been different, but you can't say they had no effect. Both mistakes had a huge effect on the overall result and pretty much sent England and Mexico out of the World Cup.

yes England played badly but at the point when the "second goal" went in we were the better team and had Germany on the back foot.

How you can say any different is beyond me and your simply wrong.

Obviously I didn't mean that.
Obviously it could've been different had the goals be allowed or disallowed (for Argentina).

But you can't say they're going home for that only reason, especially concerning England, who, I repeat it, did play the end of the match in a really bad way tactically.

I just don't like people (not necessarily you) who likes to say : "if the referee had allowed that goal, then they'd have won", like the irish guy one or two weeks ago.
That upsets me a lot.

The problem isn't about video review or not, it's really about the way refereeing is, and that's what FIFA, UEFA and International Board have to change mainly.
Because you can add video review, but if you don't work on the human part, then everything'll be useless.
That's just incredible the linesman didn't see the ball in during GER-ENG, and it's also incredible Mr Rosetti didn't disallow the goal, knowing there was an off-side. It's all because referees don't want to go back on their linemens' decisions.

ringo182 wrote:
yes England played badly but at the point when the "second goal" went in we were the better team and had Germany on the back foot.

I don't like to say that sort of things, but if England had used their brains a bit during 2nd half, they'd tried to get a compensation, knowing the referee had seen his bad call during half time. They didn't put pressure on Germany fullbacks, in order to get a red card or something.
And even though Capello is a great coach, he's made really bad choices.
Edited by Juan on 28-06-2010 14:52
heberger-image.fr/data/images/58302_Signature.png
 
CrueTrue
Fact is: No one knows what would have happened if the decisions had been correct - and that's the problem. I'd love to know Wink
 
http://www.pcmdaily.com
Whatsup
Looks like a good afternoon for me as Slovakia are going to beat Netherlands Smile
Edited by Whatsup on 28-06-2010 15:05
We are condemned to be free
 
Whatsup
Jean-Pierre Escalettes has resigned as president of the French Football Federation after France's World Cup fiasco. Thanks, it'll go a bit better now
Edited by Whatsup on 28-06-2010 15:17
We are condemned to be free
 
Juan
That was a "typical" Robben goal. Pfft
heberger-image.fr/data/images/58302_Signature.png
 
filmmaker14
Whatsup wrote:
Looks like a good afternoon for me as Slovakia are going to beat Netherlands Smile

Of course it does to you. But give it up, nobody is going to challenge the French for most embarrassing team of the tournament.

1-0 Banana Banana Banana
 
Whatsup
filmmaker14 wrote:
Whatsup wrote:
Looks like a good afternoon for me as Slovakia are going to beat Netherlands Smile

Of course it does to you. But give it up, nobody is going to challenge the French for most embarrassing team of the tournament.

1-0 Banana Banana Banana


I should've put another smiley in my post: Pfft
Edited by Whatsup on 28-06-2010 15:25
We are condemned to be free
 
Juan
filmmaker14 wrote:
Whatsup wrote:
Looks like a good afternoon for me as Slovakia are going to beat Netherlands Smile

Of course it does to you. But give it up, nobody is going to challenge the French for most embarrassing team of the tournament.

1-0 Banana Banana Banana

Well, Italy's not that far Pfft
heberger-image.fr/data/images/58302_Signature.png
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Black man
Black man
PCM 08: Funny Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,445 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,900 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.79 seconds