|
2010 World Cup South Africa
|
| ruben |
Posted on 27-06-2010 18:16
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Lorkan wrote:
ruben wrote:
valverde321 wrote:
Watch out Argentina!
For what?
A lucky country that can't defend who counters out an even poorer defending country?
Germany didn't look good today. The score is very much deceiving.
You're ridiculous sometimes Ruben... Germany has an excellent GK, Özil is really great, Klose is one of the greatest strikers in WC, Schweinsteiger very intelligent in his way of playing and so on... Germany was better than England, which played (again) very poor and have no good team.
But Germany have yet to convince me. I really don't think they are so great. Mertesacker, Lahm and Friedricht dont look like a sturdy defense and your 'excellent' goalie made a huge mistake at the English goal...
Argentina is the better team. |
| |
|
|
| Lorkan |
Posted on 27-06-2010 18:35
|
Stagiare
Posts: 249
Joined: 13-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
ruben wrote:
Lorkan wrote:
ruben wrote:
valverde321 wrote:
Watch out Argentina!
For what?
A lucky country that can't defend who counters out an even poorer defending country?
Germany didn't look good today. The score is very much deceiving.
You're ridiculous sometimes Ruben... Germany has an excellent GK, Özil is really great, Klose is one of the greatest strikers in WC, Schweinsteiger very intelligent in his way of playing and so on... Germany was better than England, which played (again) very poor and have no good team.
But Germany have yet to convince me. I really don't think they are so great. Mertesacker, Lahm and Friedricht dont look like a sturdy defense and your 'excellent' goalie made a huge mistake at the English goal...
Argentina is the better team.
Ok, now it's the moment where you're gonna tell me that he didn't save shots than others would have missed no? |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 27-06-2010 18:36
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
That's what a goalkeeper is supposed to do Lorkan, but he is judged by errors he makes, like the goal by England.
Errors like that cost you the world cup against a good team. (England wasn't rated as good team by me) |
| |
|
|
| kumazan |
Posted on 27-06-2010 19:57
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6662
Joined: 02-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
OMFG. Offside? Nah.  |
| |
|
|
| Immortal |
Posted on 27-06-2010 19:58
|
Stagiare
Posts: 223
Joined: 21-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
So, extra referee behind the goal for 2014 anyone? |
| |
|
|
| bfreire |
Posted on 27-06-2010 19:58
|
Domestique
Posts: 538
Joined: 07-11-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
All thanks to mr.blatter
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 27-06-2010 19:59
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
One of the reasons why I love NFL.
(Not to forget the other sports which have introduced video reviews over the past years...) |
| |
|
|
| lagetcher |
Posted on 27-06-2010 20:00
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1513
Joined: 13-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Poor Mexico 
We know how you feel.
FIFA are abosolute morons. |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 27-06-2010 20:01
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Immortal wrote:
So, extra referee behind the goal for 2014 anyone?
In the matches that I've seen, it worked once. The amount of times it has failed? Lots.
Video reviews, on the other hand...
Edited by CrueTrue on 27-06-2010 20:01
|
| |
|
|
| bfreire |
Posted on 27-06-2010 20:01
|
Domestique
Posts: 538
Joined: 07-11-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
I hope that mexico kicks argetina's ass
|
| |
|
|
| lagetcher |
Posted on 27-06-2010 20:03
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1513
Joined: 13-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
Immortal wrote:
So, extra referee behind the goal for 2014 anyone?
In the matches that I've seen, it worked once. The amount of times it has failed? Lots.
Video reviews, on the other hand...
Yep, videos are what we need. They have introduced it in many many sports and as far as I'm aware, it has always been a success. Cricket, Tennis, Rugby...why not Football?
Anyway, 2-0 |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 09:46
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Immortal |
Posted on 27-06-2010 20:04
|
Stagiare
Posts: 223
Joined: 21-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
Immortal wrote:
So, extra referee behind the goal for 2014 anyone?
In the matches that I've seen, it worked once. The amount of times it has failed? Lots.
Video reviews, on the other hand...
Yeah, of course I know. 
Just saying that given FIFA's positions, it's a more likely scenario. |
| |
|
|
| bfreire |
Posted on 27-06-2010 20:59
|
Domestique
Posts: 538
Joined: 07-11-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Hernandez
|
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 27-06-2010 22:00
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22246
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
Beleg32 wrote:
Tevez scores from offside and there should be foul on keeper 
Refere nows that made mistake ( he saw it on video ) and didn't change his mind
I am not really sure if he was allowed to change his decision after watching the scene again on the big screen.
This would be similar to the video proof which isn`t active yet. |
| |
|
|
| Gustavovskiy |
Posted on 27-06-2010 22:12
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6036
Joined: 20-07-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Until the International Board understands that it isn't a matter of quantity I would be really pleased with an extra referee.
I just don't get the argument against the ball chip idea. It wouldn't change anything in the match, it's purely beneficial. That said I hope the next FIFA chairman will be english...
|
| |
|
|
| Lorkan |
Posted on 27-06-2010 23:17
|
Stagiare
Posts: 249
Joined: 13-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
ruben wrote:
That's what a goalkeeper is supposed to do Lorkan, but he is judged by errors he makes, like the goal by England.
Errors like that cost you the world cup against a good team. (England wasn't rated as good team by me)
Allright, so if I follow you, there is no excellent goalkeeper, since each and every one has at least made once a mistake...
If this kind of mistake can cost you the cup, the kind of save he did after that can make you win it, simple. |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 27-06-2010 23:29
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
I'm not talking about normal mistakes, this was a blunder.
And world class goalies don't make blunders at world cups. |
| |
|
|
| niconico |
Posted on 27-06-2010 23:37
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4102
Joined: 09-07-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
One of the reasons why I love NFL.
(Not to forget the other sports which have introduced video reviews over the past years...)
It's a reasonable idea with video reviews no doubt, but I just reckon that it takes some spirit out of the game. Say there's a question about a goal whether it went in or not, and it's a crucial goal at the Worlds. It would be a bit anti-climatic if the referee staff needed to review the finish before the team could celebrate having scored, had it been a goal of course.
Linesmen should always, always be able to see if it's a goal or if it isn't.
It'd make the game less spontaneous with reviews and it doesn't fit a traditional and historic game like football.
That's just my five cents 
|
| |
|
|
| filmmaker14 |
Posted on 28-06-2010 00:24
|
Stagiare
Posts: 236
Joined: 29-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
One of the reasons why I love NFL.
(Not to forget the other sports which have introduced video reviews over the past years...)
It's a reasonable idea with video reviews no doubt, but I just reckon that it takes some spirit out of the game. Say there's a question about a goal whether it went in or not, and it's a crucial goal at the Worlds. It would be a bit anti-climatic if the referee staff needed to review the finish before the team could celebrate having scored, had it been a goal of course.
Linesmen should always, always be able to see if it's a goal or if it isn't.
It'd make the game less spontaneous with reviews and it doesn't fit a traditional and historic game like football.
That's just my five cents
2 or 3 challenges per team like in tennis would be perfect. |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 28-06-2010 07:44
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
A_Schleck wrote:
CrueTrue wrote:
One of the reasons why I love NFL.
(Not to forget the other sports which have introduced video reviews over the past years...)
It's a reasonable idea with video reviews no doubt, but I just reckon that it takes some spirit out of the game. Say there's a question about a goal whether it went in or not, and it's a crucial goal at the Worlds. It would be a bit anti-climatic if the referee staff needed to review the finish before the team could celebrate having scored, had it been a goal of course.
Linesmen should always, always be able to see if it's a goal or if it isn't.
It'd make the game less spontaneous with reviews and it doesn't fit a traditional and historic game like football.
That's just my five cents
Another system is the goal detection. When the ball has crossed the line, a vibration is sent to the ref's watch, and he can then decide to allow or disallow the goal in an instant - a combination of what he sees and what the technology tells him.
That'd fix what we saw in England - Germany, but not Argentina - Mexico.
My counter-argument to what you said is that you do spend 3-5 minutes discussing with the players anyway. If you saw the Mex-Arg match, you would notice that they were discussing with the linesman for a long period of time. That's what always happens when a decision is obviously wrong. Instead of discussing for 3-5 minutes, where the refs see their wrong decisions being played on the big screen, but without possibility to change their decisions, why not allow a video review? |
| |
|
