|
Expansion Pack: Stat Discussions
|
| Johan92 |
Posted on 20-07-2010 17:51
|
Domestique
Posts: 692
Joined: 26-09-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Then the other sprinters should get 60. And that's too low.
www.pcmnorge.no
|
| |
|
|
| siwi |
Posted on 20-07-2010 17:53
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1087
Joined: 02-11-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Hushovd was not the only sprinter in the group today. |
| |
|
|
| hillis91 |
Posted on 20-07-2010 18:21
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5948
Joined: 30-11-2006
PCM$: 2200.00
|
Hushovd got lower mountain skills then Rojas and Ciolek in the first place. Thoose 3 should have the same.
|
| |
|
|
| viking90 |
Posted on 20-07-2010 20:12
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3836
Joined: 24-01-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
hey, just order the game hope it´s in my mailbox on thursday.  If someone will be nice , just wonder what stats does Thomas Löfkvist has in the pcm.daily. DB? |
| |
|
|
| valverde321 |
Posted on 20-07-2010 23:14
|
World Champion
Posts: 12429
Joined: 20-05-2009
PCM$: 530.00
|
hillis91 wrote:
Hushovd got lower mountain skills then Rojas and Ciolek in the first place. Thoose 3 should have the same.
All the top climbers finished in the same group. I guess they should have the same also? |
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 20-07-2010 23:19
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22043
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
Today was a strange stage with very strong Hushovd, Ciolek and Rojas but if you give them a too high mountainstat, they will win too much. Today`s speed was quite low, otherwise they wouldn`t have stayed there. Maximum of 67 in my opinion for all 3 of them and hill on 73 or close to this. |
| |
|
|
| andybandy |
Posted on 20-07-2010 23:23
|
Stagiare
Posts: 162
Joined: 10-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I agree with you, 67 mou and 73 hill is perfect for Hushovd. Perhaps fighter on 74 or something like that.
|
| |
|
|
| Roo |
Posted on 24-07-2010 12:08
|
Stagiare
Posts: 218
Joined: 15-04-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I have a question, after having gone through Lars Boom's results through the years:
What should he have in cobbles?
The reason I ask this, is that he hasn't had any obvious results in cobbled classics, that (for me at least) justifies his high cobbles rating. I can definitely see a rider like him become good in cobbled classics, but so far he has no stand-out results. (Unless you count his cyclo-cross results as "cobbles" |
| |
|
|
| BouBBox |
Posted on 24-07-2010 12:40
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 857
Joined: 01-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Is there a way which isn't too long to play with the PCM daily DB but, for the teams existing in the main game, to have the stats they had... I get now quite weird results for CT teams like Vacansoleil, Topsport and Landbourkrediet winning most of the continental 3D races with 3-5 riders in the top 10 
Team Europcar !!
RIP Wouter
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 07-12-2025 09:31
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Rasmusen |
Posted on 24-07-2010 12:47
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 339
Joined: 25-06-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
CrueTrue wrote:
Hell of a job? Why? It can done in a couple of seconds with Excel
Unless, of course, I misunderstood your idea.
We're not including it, simply because it's not realistic that riders can keep their stats until they're 40. Not even Armstrong is able to do that
If he didnt fall 8 times, he would done a better job in tdf on tourmalet he was even beter dan leipheimer |
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 24-07-2010 12:52
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 27880
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yes, he would of course have won the Tour de France, had it not been for those crashes. |
| |
|
|
| Rasmusen |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:02
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 339
Joined: 25-06-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
 Dont say he would win although, the timtrial of contador is not so good today. Lower his stats please to 75 haha |
| |
|
|
| Dezwarte |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:13
|
Amateur
Posts: 1
Joined: 12-06-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
When Gesink has 80 on hills, Van den Broeck need it also, and Van den Broeck has also a better Time Trial than Gesink I think!
So VDB is underrated  |
| |
|
|
| Anonymer |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:16
|
Domestique
Posts: 484
Joined: 20-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Dezwarte wrote:
When Gesink has 80 on hills, Van den Broeck need it also, and Van den Broeck has also a better Time Trial than Gesink I think!
So VDB is underrated
Van den Broeck was quite bad today, so i think is time tiral is ok, Gesink should be 79 in mountain, 78 hills. |
| |
|
|
| Rasmusen |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:31
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 339
Joined: 25-06-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
no gesink is better then 79, 80 or 81 is good if schleck an contador are 82 a 83 |
| |
|
|
| kissaha |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:45
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1800
Joined: 21-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
I would rate the mountain skill alone as follows:
83
A. Schleck
Contador
80
F. Schleck
S. Sanchez
Basso
Menchov
79
Nibali
Evans
Gesink
J. Rodriguez
Van den Broeck
78
Mosquera
Kreuziger
Szmyd
Vino
Scarponi
Leipheimer
77
Rogers
Klöden
Anton
Sastre
Wiggins
Armstrong
etc..
For Contador and Andy to make differences as they do IRL, they need quite much higher MO stat than the rest of the field. I have not taken the rest of the stats in account.
Edited by kissaha on 24-07-2010 16:46
|
| |
|
|
| jph27 |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:46
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7374
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
Szmyd better than Sastre? |
| |
|
|
| Anonymer |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:50
|
Domestique
Posts: 484
Joined: 20-07-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
kissaha wrote:
I would rate the mountain skill alone as follows:
83
A. Schleck
Contador
80
F. Schleck
S. Sanchez
Basso
Menchov
79
Nibali
Evans
Gesink
J. Rodriguez
Van den Broeck
78
Mosquera
Kreuziger
Szmyd
Vino
Scarponi
Leipheimer
77
Rogers
Klöden
Anton
Sastre
Wiggins
Armstrong
etc..
For Contador and Andy to make differences as they do IRL, they need quite much higher MO stat than the rest of the field. I have not taken the rest of the stats in account.
Schleck+Contador 82
Mosquera+Szmyd+scraponi 77
wiggins+sastre 78 |
| |
|
|
| kissaha |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:54
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1800
Joined: 21-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
jph27 wrote:
Szmyd better than Sastre?
I think so, yes. I can't remember him climbing well since last years Giro. And he isn't getting any younger either. |
| |
|
|
| kissaha |
Posted on 24-07-2010 16:55
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1800
Joined: 21-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Anonymer wrote:
Schleck+Contador 82
Mosquera+Szmyd+scraponi 77
wiggins+sastre 78
I don't agree |
| |
|
