|
News in July
|
| Kami |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:00
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3485
Joined: 19-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
Deadpool wrote:
chrica04 wrote:
he is the second best rider to ever ride a bike. Next to Eddy Mercxx
Very interesting, perhaps your forgetting that Eddy Merckx, like almost every other great cyclist, had positive doping tests.
Twice
|
| |
|
|
| CrueTrue |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:01
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 29989
Joined: 20-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
The L'Équipe story kadel mentioned about more positives before the tour?
"between 4 and 7 positives, from Romandie and Suisse"
Interesting. Maybe they really do have that new test that they say they have... |
| |
|
|
| Waghlon |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:02
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7694
Joined: 18-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
*does logical assumptions*
If Merkcx was doped... And everyone that were worse than Armstrong was doped...
*lightbulb*
That means Armstrong must have been doped too...
ooooOOOOoooHH!
THE THOMAS VOECKLER PROPHET OF PCM DAILY
 |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:02
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Three times, actually.
Still nowhere close to Armstrong's 7 positives from the 99 Tour. |
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 01:26
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Stijn_vranken |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:09
|
Sprinter
Posts: 1638
Joined: 28-03-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
Three times, actually.
Still nowhere close to Armstrong's 7 positives from the 99 Tour.
Armstrong = Fail!!! 
prevent hangovers --> stay drunk
pozzato, basically the most stupid cyclist around
RIP WW. Gone but not forgotten
|
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:10
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Turns out Dekker's "I have a letter from the UCI saying my blood values are normal" is bullcrap.
What the letter in fact says is, basically something similar to "your tests of the year 2008 don't hold results that can be considered a positive dope test" |
| |
|
|
| Deadpool |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:30
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 06-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
doddy13 wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Oh. okay then. Carry on as you were.
I'm in your universe.
It's a nice place.
Wait a minute, are you guys referencing Star Trek TNG... |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:31
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
Three times, actually.
Still nowhere close to Armstrong's 7 positives from the 99 Tour. Which brings us to the question why Armstrong has never been punished.
Also they can retest samples 8 years back on base of suspicion. So...if the UCI are doubting Armstrong so much, why not retest samples from 2003 to 2005?
Oh well.. |
| |
|
|
| Deadpool |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:31
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7357
Joined: 06-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
Three times, actually.
Still nowhere close to Armstrong's 7 positives from the 99 Tour.
What, do you always read the label on skincare products  |
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:32
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
Turns out Dekker's "I have a letter from the UCI saying my blood values are normal" is bullcrap.
What the letter in fact says is, basically something similar to "your tests of the year 2008 don't hold results that can be considered a positive dope test" Hmm but still Silence asked for his blood passport values when they contracted him and UCI said there was nothing suspicious against Silence.
So what the hell are they doing then? |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 02-07-2009 17:34
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
ruben wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Three times, actually.
Still nowhere close to Armstrong's 7 positives from the 99 Tour. Which brings us to the question why Armstrong has never been punished.
Not enough left to be used for a B sample in case he orders it. That's the sole reason why he's not suspended.
ruben wrote:
Also they can retest samples 8 years back on base of suspicion. So...if the UCI are doubting Armstrong so much, why not retest samples from 2003 to 2005?
Oh well..
Because they don't want him to get caught. The UCI is corrupt, that's a fact.
Deadpool wrote:
issoisso wrote:
Three times, actually.
Still nowhere close to Armstrong's 7 positives from the 99 Tour.
What, do you always read the label on skincare products
And the 6 EPO positives... |
| |
|
|
| ponka00 |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:01
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 820
Joined: 27-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
issoisso wrote:
ruben wrote:
Also they can retest samples 8 years back on base of suspicion. So...if the UCI are doubting Armstrong so much, why not retest samples from 2003 to 2005?
Oh well..
Because they don't want him to get caught. The UCI is corrupt, that's a fact.
Thats what I thought aswell... I think UCI is afraid of destroying cycling by catching Armstrong. |
| |
|
|
| Kami |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:04
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3485
Joined: 19-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
ponka00 wrote:
issoisso wrote:
ruben wrote:
Also they can retest samples 8 years back on base of suspicion. So...if the UCI are doubting Armstrong so much, why not retest samples from 2003 to 2005?
Oh well..
Because they don't want him to get caught. The UCI is corrupt, that's a fact.
Thats what I thought aswell... I think UCI is afraid of destroying cycling by catching Armstrong.
Armstrong is very popular amongst ppl who know less of cycling, he is kinda the same as Merckx, they wanna have another legend.
|
| |
|
|
| ruben |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:15
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Well if they are so concerned with legends, then in that case they might as well let Dekker ride and have a Dutch legend and promote the sport in Holland. That just makes no sense to me. Or maybe they see more in Gesink and protect him. No, that makes even less sense. I don't believe in such conspiracy theories.
I think they are rather clueless. That's all. |
| |
|
|
| issoisso |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:18
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
It's been well documented that certain teams (such as Quickstep) have insiders who tell them when they'll be tested. |
| |
|
|
| fintas |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:29
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2602
Joined: 21-03-2008
PCM$: 1200.00
|
French cyclist Clement Lhotellerie fired by Vacansoleil over doping
https://ca.sports....;type=lgns
Edited by fintas on 02-07-2009 18:30
|
| |
|
|
| Kami |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:30
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3485
Joined: 19-06-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
fintas wrote:
French cyclist Clement Lhotellerie fired by Vacansoleil over doping
Old news <.<
|
| |
|
|
| fintas |
Posted on 02-07-2009 18:30
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2602
Joined: 21-03-2008
PCM$: 1200.00
|
Kami wrote:
fintas wrote:
French cyclist Clement Lhotellerie fired by Vacansoleil over doping
Old news <.<
Sory |
| |
|
|
| Phanekim |
Posted on 02-07-2009 20:33
|
Neo-Pro
Posts: 361
Joined: 05-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
armstrong just isn't dumb enough to dope anymore. he used to and its clear that is the case but now its pretty much the most retarded thing he can do. |
| |
|
|
| Immortal |
Posted on 02-07-2009 20:45
|
Stagiare
Posts: 223
Joined: 21-05-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Phanekim wrote:
armstrong just isn't dumb enough to dope anymore. he used to and its clear that is the case but now its pretty much the most retarded thing he can do.
I don`t wan`t to start another Lance-is-obviously-doped-discussion, but wheter you are doping or not has nothing to do with dumbness...
With all the medicaments on the market to hide doping and all forms of it that can`t even be detected, the changes of Armstrong getting caught are close to zero (if he should decide to dope).
And even if he was caught, what should ASO do? Tell the world that the guy who won their race seven years in a road was doped? That`s suicide.
Lance can dope as much as he`d like to. In fact, even as sad as it sounds, he`d be stupid if he did not dope. |
| |
|
