|
Ideas/Suggestions for 2014
|
| SportingNonsense |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:08
|
Team Manager
Posts: 33046
Joined: 08-03-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Just thought Id throw open a thread for anyone to offer suggestions for changes to the ManGame, with the end of the season now being one 'in game' month away.
Can be about any aspect of the game, any thoughts that you might have are welcome.
|
| |
|
|
| Dippofix |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:22
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3906
Joined: 29-01-2013
PCM$: 300.00
|
I think somebody suggested it last year already, but a B-Worlds would be a great idea. A race in which all the Nations that can't field a team for the proper worlds, held at an obscure location like Kyrgyzstan or somewhere. There could also be a special jersey, like there is for the real one.
|
| |
|
|
| SotD |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:25
|
World Champion
Posts: 12188
Joined: 29-11-2006
PCM$: 2980.00
|
My only suggestion would be to take a little bit off the game, to speed up the process slightly... 14-15 months or whatever it has taken from transferperiod to transferperiod is a bit too long I think. A year could be alright though.
Also, just a question. Which PCM version are we using next season? The same as this season?
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:30
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Not making Goals before knowing races... or assigning races with priority to those with that race selected as a Goal. This really bugged me at the start of the year as i felt heavily punished for being busy.
I would say a specific set of Man-Game awards but i could organize that via The Sound...
|
| |
|
|
| Luis Leon Sanchez |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:30
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5533
Joined: 12-06-2013
PCM$: 500.00
|
My recommendation. Use the Same PCM Version for every race. Not a few on 13, some one 11 and 12, etc.
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:31
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
My recommendation. Use the Same PCM Version for every race. Not a few on 13, some one 11 and 12, etc.
All races were run on PCM12 this season. And all, i think, will be on PCM13 next season
|
| |
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 02:13
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| Luis Leon Sanchez |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:33
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5533
Joined: 12-06-2013
PCM$: 500.00
|
Oh ok. Thats good then.
|
| |
|
|
| cio93 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:34
|
World Champion
Posts: 10845
Joined: 29-10-2007
PCM$: 500.00
|
Luis Leon Sanchez wrote:
My recommendation. Use the Same PCM Version for every race. Not a few on 13, some one 11 and 12, etc.
I'm really interested to hear why you got that impression.
|
| |
|
|
| aidanvn13 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:34
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 2797
Joined: 06-11-2010
PCM$: 200.00
|
I certainly hope we use PCM13. I can't take these non-selective mountain stages in PCM12. IMO, PCM13 has more selective mountain stages - that don't end in 80rider sprints.
|
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:36
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22246
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
The PCM version never change indeed during a season!
I think the B-Worlds would be interesting and some kind of reward for those managers with exotic teams.
Teams like Costa Rica, African countries, Eastern Europe for example struggle to make it to the Worlds.
But as this would be very time consuming it depends of course if anybody has some time to do an inofficial Worlds. |
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:39
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
Speaking of those very focused teams... Some form of reward for being Nationalistic? Cash or Race Priority or Something Else. Just an incentive to not just get the best riders possible, but to build a real project (like Oz, JK before it disappeared, Boeing and more)
|
| |
|
|
| jph27 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:40
|
Team Leader
Posts: 7339
Joined: 20-03-2010
PCM$: 900.00
|
Get rid of the loan cap - or at least stagger it so that talent-centric CT and PCT teams can loan out level 3 talents without having to dip into their wage cap. For example, Dombrowski will cripple a potentially CT WWE team due to the cap as they may be able to only loan him out and no one in. |
| |
|
|
| roturn |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:42
|
Team Manager
Posts: 22246
Joined: 24-11-2007
PCM$: 3900.00
|
TheManxMissile wrote:
Speaking of those very focused teams... Some form of reward for being Nationalistic? Cash or Race Priority or Something Else. Just an incentive to not just get the best riders possible, but to build a real project (like Oz, JK before it disappeared, Boeing and more)
Not sure if this is smart.
I think going a bit exotic will reward you automatically in a few seasons either way as you have less interesting markets as first and this way smaller wages. Then you have the opportunity to develop some talents there. No need to be 6 or 7. Also potential 5 guys could become very good PCT riders or role players in PT.
Giving them a reward would only lead to several others going this way and this could lead to some inbalance in the more interesting markets I think.
Edited by roturn on 20-01-2014 19:43
|
| |
|
|
| Miguel98 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:42
|
World Champion
Posts: 10497
Joined: 23-06-2011
PCM$: 200.00
|
I remember SN to pretty sure confirm that we will use PCM 2013. And what reason would it be compared to PCM 2012?
I like the B-Worlds idea, altough that may be a signal of more work for SN. |
| |
|
|
| Luis Leon Sanchez |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:45
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5533
Joined: 12-06-2013
PCM$: 500.00
|
I dont like the Loan Cap idea either. The loan cap does however prevent CT teams from completely dominating everything.
|
| |
|
|
| TheManxMissile |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:53
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 18187
Joined: 12-05-2012
PCM$: 0.00
|
@Roturn
It's a fair point. But if i think of an idea i'll put it out, can't hurt to try 
@Loan Cap
I agree.... mostly. I can totally understand why it's there, and it's not to hobble the CT teams, but to prevent them being exploited. However it does more damage to them than good, imo. The WWE example is a good one, but admittedly it's part of the risk you take when signing the huge name talent for half a million. A large part of that damage depends on how his wage drops.
I don't think the Loan Cap should totally disappear, but it should be reduced to allow CT teams to own a bigish talent without having to worry about how they can get in other riders.
|
| |
|
|
| welker3257 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 19:55
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2336
Joined: 29-05-2013
PCM$: 200.00
|
I like Manx's idea and the B-Nations Worlds. I think the Loan Cap needs to be there so that a CT team, can't just dominate.
Gig 'em Aggies
Fast N' Loud Cycling Project - ICL
|
| |
|
|
| Cycleman123 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 20:12
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4478
Joined: 30-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
I think the B-Worlds are a great idea, just as long as they're not too time-consuming. Also I think LLS got his idea of changing games from EPIC. I like the loan cap idea, because a CT team can theoretically sign someone for 400k and still have a decent team.
|
| |
|
|
| Cycleman123 |
Posted on 20-01-2014 20:12
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4478
Joined: 30-07-2012
PCM$: 200.00
|
I think the B-Worlds are a great idea, just as long as they're not too time-consuming. Also I think LLS got his idea of changing games from EPIC. I like the loan cap idea, because a CT team can theoretically sign someone for 400k and still have a decent team.
|
| |
|
|
| Luis Leon Sanchez |
Posted on 20-01-2014 20:15
|
Team Leader
Posts: 5533
Joined: 12-06-2013
PCM$: 500.00
|
Though when a CT team promotes then they will have a hard time finding strongiders so they can compete.
|
| |
|
![imgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpg](https://imgur.com/KlJUqDx.jpg[/img[img]]https://imgur.com/yUygrQ.jpg)
