So first you are exploiting AI for content and now your own kids?
The more previews the better but in the end your personal take is still the one im most interested in
Just to be sure: The expected points ranking is the AI generated formula from last season and the claude ranking is a different AI with a different data set?
So first you are exploiting AI for content and now your own kids?
The more previews the better but in the end your personal take is still the one im most interested in
Just to be sure: The expected points ranking is the AI generated formula from last season and the claude ranking is a different AI with a different data set?
2 models yeah.
1 made before the season that is just based on expected points made by a formula from last season. Ive had this formula available during transfers but not really used it. I can give a spoiler that it dosen't really like my own team
The other is a formula that takes into consideration how different riders scored last season but put quite a lot more emphasis on about 200-250 test races I have uploaded. Considering the reason for these test races has been to test riders I was interested in and considered it will be "based" upon PCT results and PCT fields, so there are some considerable weaknesses both for PT and CT (though there are some C2 and quite a lot of PTHC data in it). Startlists has mostly been last years (though with updated stats) with some changes
The main part is as I wrote me squinting in the database and totally objectively consider different riders and teams. I've also written on it a few teams at a time since the db got uploaded, so riders quite a like can be quite differently ranked just based on when I wrote it (thought the ranking was made before I started writing)
I really hope my own opinions beat pure formulas, and even more important I hope it beats a random ranking from my kids (which I have to get them to do....)
