This was a 2014 Dauphine style win. DOES ANYONE DISPUTE THAT TALANSKY WAS THE STRONGEST?!
Just no....this genuinely wants me to never watch cycling ever again. There is so much more to cycling than the final results (although they do matter). This is not the Tour, this is a race where riders want to see where they are at, and if they can win it they will.
This is a pointless discussion but.. practically Fuglsang won the race with the bonus sec. There he won 20 (in total) vs 6 for Porte. Anyway the bonus sec. are part of the game, BUUT Porte rode the course faster with 4 seconds. Argo..was a bit stronger.
About the last stage I think he was also the strongest, he had to follow every attack and maybe had a bad moment at the end of the penultimate climb. He had to pull alone for 30 km., didn't have monster Kwiat in the valley. and despite this effort, he rode the final climb in Par with Fuglsang.
The Dane had an amazing ride himself, best of his career but LRP was stronger.
Arberg27 wrote:
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic.
You will see in the Tour, how Fuglsang will barely get a Top10. He had mostly more room, since he's not a danger. Even fucking Talansky won the Dauphine in 2014. He was also not the strongest, but he was allowed to go for it on the last stage as well.
Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.
_____________________________________________ PCM Velogames Championship - Top Results
* 1st Tour de Suisse ('23)
* 1st Tour de Romandie ('19, '18)
* 1st Tour de Pologne ('20, '19)
* 2nd Tour of California ('19)
* 2nd Tour de Suisse ('18)
* 3rd Tour de France ('23, '21)
* 3rd Giro d’Italia ('22)
* 3rd Vuelta Espana ('23)
* 3rd Autumn Classics ('19, '18)
* 9th Spring Classics ('18)
Arberg27 wrote:
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic.
You will see in the Tour, how Fuglsang will barely get a Top10. He had mostly more room, since he's not a danger. Even fucking Talansky won the Dauphine in 2014. He was also not the strongest, but he was allowed to go for it on the last stage as well.
Arberg27 wrote:
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic.
You will see in the Tour, how Fuglsang will barely get a Top10. He had mostly more room, since he's not a danger. Even fucking Talansky won the Dauphine in 2014. He was also not the strongest, but he was allowed to go for it on the last stage as well.
Still better than Porte...
Very low even for you.
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
Very low even for you.
