|
Critérium du Dauphiné 2017
|
|
| Ad Bot |
Posted on 24-11-2024 18:45
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
| IP: None |
|
|
| ringo182 |
Posted on 13-06-2017 11:15
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
Masterblaster01 wrote:
Well, he was superb in the time trial, but also the strongest in the mountains imo. Why? He cought every attack they threw at him, except for Fuglsangs attack. Fuglsang was fresh, could just hang in the wheel and follow, until it was his turn. Porte couldn't or wouldn't follow, we don't know, but i think Porte was physically the strongest rider in the Dauphiné, but just couldn't follow every single attack on his own. Astana had an tactial advantage they played well.
Great performance by Fugl though, being in that spot and doing it. Curious to see if Fugl still has this form in the TdF or that he just had his peek.
Apart from the sprint where he pulled Porte, Froome and Aru to the finish line and the last stage where he put over a minute into Porte.
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
|
| |
|
|
| Raziz |
Posted on 13-06-2017 12:24
|
Domestique
Posts: 552
Joined: 22-12-2016
PCM$: 200.00
|
This, I despise.
This was a 2014 Dauphine style win. DOES ANYONE DISPUTE THAT TALANSKY WAS THE STRONGEST?!
Just no....this genuinely wants me to never watch cycling ever again. There is so much more to cycling than the final results (although they do matter). This is not the Tour, this is a race where riders want to see where they are at, and if they can win it they will.
Onto July! |
| |
|
|
| wisdow23 |
Posted on 13-06-2017 12:31
|
Stagiare
Posts: 173
Joined: 03-05-2009
PCM$: 200.00
|
This is a pointless discussion but.. practically Fuglsang won the race with the bonus sec. There he won 20 (in total) vs 6 for Porte. Anyway the bonus sec. are part of the game, BUUT Porte rode the course faster with 4 seconds. Argo..was a bit stronger.
About the last stage I think he was also the strongest, he had to follow every attack and maybe had a bad moment at the end of the penultimate climb. He had to pull alone for 30 km., didn't have monster Kwiat in the valley. and despite this effort, he rode the final climb in Par with Fuglsang.
The Dane had an amazing ride himself, best of his career but LRP was stronger. |
| |
|
|
| ringo182 |
Posted on 13-06-2017 12:47
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
I hadn't considered the bonus seconds 
"Ringo is exactly right", Shonak - 8 September 2016
|
| |
|
|
| Arberg27 |
Posted on 13-06-2017 17:45
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1070
Joined: 21-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic. |
| |
|
|
| Paul23 |
Posted on 13-06-2017 17:50
|
Grand Tour Specialist
Posts: 4411
Joined: 10-08-2011
PCM$: 400.00
|
Arberg27 wrote:
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic.
You will see in the Tour, how Fuglsang will barely get a Top10. He had mostly more room, since he's not a danger. Even fucking Talansky won the Dauphine in 2014. He was also not the strongest, but he was allowed to go for it on the last stage as well.
|
| |
|
|
| Arberg27 |
Posted on 13-06-2017 18:04
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1070
Joined: 21-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Yes, Fuglsang was lucky with to be the fastest rider, on all increases, on all 3 mountain stages. |
| |
|
|
| Kalach |
Posted on 13-06-2017 18:08
|
Breakaway Specialist
Posts: 880
Joined: 04-08-2012
PCM$: 300.00
|
https://www.velone...mfmdiq8.01
Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the mouth.
_____________________________________________
PCM Velogames Championship - Top Results
* 1st Tour de Suisse ('23)
* 1st Tour de Romandie ('19, '18)
* 1st Tour de Pologne ('20, '19)
* 2nd Tour of California ('19)
* 2nd Tour de Suisse ('18)
* 3rd Tour de France ('23, '21)
* 3rd Giro d’Italia ('22)
* 3rd Vuelta Espana ('23)
* 3rd Autumn Classics ('19, '18)
* 9th Spring Classics ('18)
|
| |
|
|
| Ian Butler |
Posted on 14-06-2017 11:35
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 21854
Joined: 01-05-2012
PCM$: 400.00
|
Nice article! |
| |
|
|
| Arberg27 |
Posted on 09-07-2017 17:56
|
Protected Rider
Posts: 1070
Joined: 21-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Paul23 wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic.
You will see in the Tour, how Fuglsang will barely get a Top10. He had mostly more room, since he's not a danger. Even fucking Talansky won the Dauphine in 2014. He was also not the strongest, but he was allowed to go for it on the last stage as well. Still better than Porte... |
| |
|
|
| Shonak |
Posted on 09-07-2017 18:09
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 15615
Joined: 16-07-2013
PCM$: 350.00
|
Arberg27 wrote:
Paul23 wrote:
Arberg27 wrote:
Porte was the strongest because he could not follow Fuglsang #pcmdaily using logic.
Contador was also stronger than Fuglsang because he beat him on time trials, everyone was stronger than Fuglsang! #pcmdaily using logic.
Fuglsang was just very lucky on the 3 mountain stages! #pcmdaily using logic.
You will see in the Tour, how Fuglsang will barely get a Top10. He had mostly more room, since he's not a danger. Even fucking Talansky won the Dauphine in 2014. He was also not the strongest, but he was allowed to go for it on the last stage as well. Still better than Porte...
 Very low even for you.
"It’s a little bit scary when Contador attacks." - Tommy V
|
| |
|
