PCM.daily banner
23-11-2024 08:54
PCM.daily
Users Online
· Guests Online: 92

· Members Online: 0

· Total Members: 161,791
· Newest Member: Aurograa100 Mg
View Thread
PCM.daily » Off-Topic » Cycling
 Print Thread
Vuelta á Espana 2016
ringo182
the_hoyle wrote:
Ian Butler wrote:
Though you just know Michelle likes it dirty Cool

projectflashcards.com/sites/default/files/Mr%20Bean%20if%20you%20Know%20what%20I%20mean%20back.jpg


And another PCMDaily thread descends into innuendo Smile
 
Arberg27
Contador, Valverde and Astana is doped. Froome, Sagan and Sky is clean.
 
Selwink
Do you have any proof Contador, Valverde and Astana are currently doping?
pcmdaily.com/images/mg/micro/npn.png[PCT] Novatek-Panarmenian.net
[ICL] Sugoi-Xanterra & Canada Dry Dev Team
Stages (Requests closed)

i.imgur.com/vR8EVAA.png

'But why were [...] they helped to get to space? To find answers, we must look at predictions not of science, but of science-fiction.'
Ancient Aliens
 
ringo182
Selwink wrote:
Do you have any proof Contador, Valverde and Astana are currently doping?


No one has any real evidence of anything, which is what makes these conversations so frustrating and to a large extent pointless. It's all just opinion. Even much of the media reporting is rumour. Look at the way the French media treated Froome and Sky at the 2015 Tour. All based on nothing but their opinion they must be on drugs because they are winning.

Although there is proof of Contador, Valverde and Astana having doping bans in the past.
 
Thatguyeveryonehates
ringo182 wrote:
So now he's a cyber hacker.


So I sat down and logged on to the Federation email address. Posing as Julius Mwangi, I wrote a short letter to the UCI, informing them that I would like to enter Christopher Froome, one of my country's most promising Under-23 riders, into the World Championships at that grade in the autumn. Thank you.


from Froome's book
are you saying froome is a liar?

ringo182 wrote:
So you have access to the Team Sky rider schedules and you have evidence of him being told he wouldn't be going because "team management wanted to take someone who would actually have a future in the sport". Or is that just hearsay from the media.


its from sean yates book. yates was the one who told him.

https://www.amazo...amp;sr=8-1


you should do some reading. you might learn an actual fact or two



since you ignored most of my previous post and drew attention to only the two things you thought you could cast doubt on, i expect you will do the same now and ignore most of this post
 
I_Mayo
What happened here? Maybe we actually need separate threads for stages or at least the week?
 
Ad Bot
Posted on 23-11-2024 08:54
Bot Agent

Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09

IP: None  
ringo182
Thatguyeveryonehates wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
So now he's a cyber hacker.


So I sat down and logged on to the Federation email address. Posing as Julius Mwangi, I wrote a short letter to the UCI, informing them that I would like to enter Christopher Froome, one of my country's most promising Under-23 riders, into the World Championships at that grade in the autumn. Thank you.


from Froome's book
are you saying froome is a liar?

ringo182 wrote:
So you have access to the Team Sky rider schedules and you have evidence of him being told he wouldn't be going because "team management wanted to take someone who would actually have a future in the sport". Or is that just hearsay from the media.


its from sean yates book. yates was the one who told him.

https://www.amazo...amp;sr=8-1


you should do some reading. you might learn an actual fact or two



since you ignored most of my previous post and drew attention to only the two things you thought you could cast doubt on, i expect you will do the same now and ignore most of this post


Fair enough, although if Froome is talking about it in his book it's obviously not a big deal. I haven't read his book cause I'm not a fanboy Smile
All of what you say is hearsay and rumour. If your'evidence' was evidence then he would have been banned. That's my point. A few quotes in autobiographies doesn't equal doping.
 
SSJ2Luigi
Ian Butler wrote:
Also I don't get why people love Valverde so much. Well maybe I can understand it. But if he's doing this, I have a very hard time believing what I'm seeing. Especially given his past and - you know... This is cycling. Anyone performing well is a suspect, but this is just over the top. Grin

Barney Stinson said
People like to be lied to , they just don't like finding out they been lied to, because a lie is just a great story that someone ruined with the truth

 
Tamijo
I don't understand why this many people on a homepage devoted to pro cycling, is so obsessed with throwing doping accusations left and right, why not enjoy the race and let the police media ext. deal with possible doping use.
 
larsaliknt
ringo182 wrote:
Selwink wrote:
Do you have any proof Contador, Valverde and Astana are currently doping?


No one has any real evidence of anything, which is what makes these conversations so frustrating and to a large extent pointless. It's all just opinion. Even much of the media reporting is rumour.


Also, by Tamijo: I don't understand why this many people on a homepage devoted to pro cycling, is so obsessed with throwing doping accusations left and right, why not enjoy the race and let the police media ext. deal with possible doping use.

So much THIS. Thanks for your coherence, guys.

Though at the same time I'll admit that doping has been undisputedly so linked to cycling that debates like these are inevitable. Let's just not lose our heads by speculating.
 
Riis123
Pena Cabarga's inclusion in the Vuelta has been very successful and rather dramatic every time; in 2010, Antón who clearly was the best rider in that Vuelta so far, crashed right as the peloton was going his favourite terrain leading into Cabarga. Purito won that stage with a trademark Rodriguez attack, but would later lose freaking 7 minutes in the time trial.

Next year, Froome and Cobo battled on this climb. Froome somehow managed to throw his bike over the line before Cobo in what was a pretty good duel for the stage and the GC - safe to say, Froome had won if not for SIR BRAD.

It was also here Horner began to show superiority to Nibali in 2013. A stage Vasili won, if memory serves.
 
Strydz
larsaliknt wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Selwink wrote:
Do you have any proof Contador, Valverde and Astana are currently doping?


No one has any real evidence of anything, which is what makes these conversations so frustrating and to a large extent pointless. It's all just opinion. Even much of the media reporting is rumour.


Also, by Tamijo: I don't understand why this many people on a homepage devoted to pro cycling, is so obsessed with throwing doping accusations left and right, why not enjoy the race and let the police media ext. deal with possible doping use.

So much THIS. Thanks for your coherence, guys.

Though at the same time I'll admit that doping has been undisputedly so linked to cycling that debates like these are inevitable. Let's just not lose our heads by speculating.


Well if the authorities had proven effective in doping controls and actually wanting to catch dopers then I'm sure people wouldn't talk about it so much, pro sports is rotten to its core with corruption, doping and cheating so it's really no surprise at all that people who watch pro sports raise doubts on performances
Hells 500 Crew and 6 x Everester
Don Rd Launching Place
Melbourne Hill Rd Warrandyte
Colby Drive Belgrave South
William Rd The Patch
David Hill Rd Monbulk
Lakeside Drive Emerald
https://www.everesting.cc/hall-of-fame/
 
Aquarius97
23-men breakaway. Looks that they have the stage win for them, but Tinkoff has started to pull in the peloton, and have reduced the gap to 4 minutes.

I don't think Tinkoff will make this alone, only if another team wants to win the stage, ¿Sky?
 
Aquarius97
Gonçalves out
 
Riis123
Contador wants a piece of Pena Cabarga!
 
ringo182
You would have thought Tinkoff would just let the others do the work. Why kill themselves to pull the break back only for Contador to blow up again half way up the final climb again.
Contador is not strong enough to ride away from the others at this moment. He needs to concentrate on limiting losses.
 
Aquarius97
The gap with 65 km to go is 2 minutes
 
Riis123
ringo182 wrote:
You would have thought Tinkoff would just let the others do the work. Why kill themselves to pull the break back only for Contador to blow up again half way up the final climb again.
Contador is not strong enough to ride away from the others at this moment. He needs to concentrate on limiting losses.


He tries and that is certainly to be applauded. What should the likes of Paulinho, Gogl etc. do anyways? They have done nada, zero during the Vuelta anyways so might as well see if he can win a stage. I like that attitude.
 
ringo182
Riis123 wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
You would have thought Tinkoff would just let the others do the work. Why kill themselves to pull the break back only for Contador to blow up again half way up the final climb again.
Contador is not strong enough to ride away from the others at this moment. He needs to concentrate on limiting losses.


He tries and that is certainly to be applauded. What should the likes of Paulinho, Gogl etc. do anyways? They have done nada, zero during the Vuelta anyways so might as well see if he can win a stage. I like that attitude.


True. His attitude is good but tactics are very bad.
Why do they need to chase the break down for him to attack on the climb? His team would be more use to him on the mountain then chasing the break down.
All that's going to happen no is Movistar and Sky will take over on the climb and Contador will be isolated early on cause his team is knackered.
 
larsaliknt
Strydz wrote:
larsaliknt wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
Selwink wrote:
Do you have any proof Contador, Valverde and Astana are currently doping?


No one has any real evidence of anything, which is what makes these conversations so frustrating and to a large extent pointless. It's all just opinion. Even much of the media reporting is rumour.


Also, by Tamijo: I don't understand why this many people on a homepage devoted to pro cycling, is so obsessed with throwing doping accusations left and right, why not enjoy the race and let the police media ext. deal with possible doping use.

So much THIS. Thanks for your coherence, guys.

Though at the same time I'll admit that doping has been undisputedly so linked to cycling that debates like these are inevitable. Let's just not lose our heads by speculating.


Well if the authorities had proven effective in doping controls and actually wanting to catch dopers then I'm sure people wouldn't talk about it so much, pro sports is rotten to its core with corruption, doping and cheating so it's really no surprise at all that people who watch pro sports raise doubts on performances


Hey, it's impossible not to raise suspicions - considering that we all know what we know. I'm just saying, some people forget about suspicions and start to blatantly accuse and to take things for granted.
 
Jump to Forum:
Login
Username

Password



Not a member yet?
Click here to register.

Forgotten your password?
Request a new one here.
Latest content
Screenshots
Threading the needle?
Threading the needle?
PCM12: Funny Screenshots
Fantasy Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet fighti... 18,376 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 17,374 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 15,345 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,552 PCM$
bullet baseba... 10,439 PCM$

bullet Main Fantasy Betting page
bullet Rankings: Top 100
ManGame Betting
Current bets:
No bets available.
Best gamblers:
bullet Ollfardh 21,890 PCM$
bullet df_Trek 15,520 PCM$
bullet Marcovdw 14,800 PCM$
bullet jseadog1 13,500 PCM$
bullet baseball... 7,332 PCM$

bullet Main MG Betting page
bullet Get weekly MG PCM$
bullet Rankings: Top 100
Render time: 0.96 seconds