Other Races 2009
|
rjc_43 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 13:45
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6716
Joined: 13-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Seeing as it's you that is trying to make the point, it's up to you to provide the hard empirical evidence to prove it. Just for cycling. You can't quote another sport when talking about cycling.
As a roadie, I know what I'd prefer to watch any day.
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk] [/url]
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 13:54
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
rjc_43 wrote:
As a roadie, I know what I'd prefer to watch any day.
but the vast majority of of eurosport viewers aren't roadies so they have to base their decission on what the majority will be more interested in. The majority will be casual watchers and so track cycling will be more interesting to them so they will get more viewers and therefore more sponsorship money.
at the end of the day it's all about profit.
also, it's not just me trying to make a point. others are trying to make a point against me with even less evidence then i have offered. and considering it's me vs everyone at the moment, if you had evidence i wouldn't have a chance in this debate i am using generalised evidence, but it's more then you are offering.
|
|
|
|
issoisso |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:00
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
ringo182 wrote:
rjc_43 wrote:
As a roadie, I know what I'd prefer to watch any day.
but the vast majority of of eurosport viewers aren't roadies so they have to base their decission on what the majority will be more interested in. The majority will be casual watchers and so track cycling will be more interesting to them so they will get more viewers and therefore more sponsorship money.
at the end of the day it's all about profit.
also, it's not just me trying to make a point. others are trying to make a point against me with even less evidence then i have offered. and considering it's me vs everyone at the moment, if you had evidence i wouldn't have a chance in this debate i am using generalised evidence, but it's more then you are offering.
I'm sorry, but saying "this is this way because I say so" is not evidence. Also, just because you don't like all the evidence that has been presented to you, does not discard it
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
|
rjc_43 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:01
|
Team Leader
Posts: 6716
Joined: 13-10-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Taking just a random sample from the internet, based on website views of Eurosport UK, we can clearly see the peak for visitors is July. When all the good sporting events are on, and when the TdF is streamed on live audio. I'm using this as evidence in a greater popularity of road racing over Track crap.
https://siteanalytics.compete.com/euro...?metric=uv
[url=cleavercycling.co.uk] [/url]
|
|
|
|
issoisso |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:10
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
rjc_43 wrote:
Taking just a random sample from the internet, based on website views of Eurosport UK, we can clearly see the peak for visitors is July. When all the good sporting events are on, and when the TdF is streamed on live audio. I'm using this as evidence in a greater popularity of road racing over Track crap.
https://siteanalytics.compete.com/euro...?metric=uv
In other sports, there's basically not much difference between March and April, so I'd say we can compare those two months and make the analogy of the results to cycling
Now compare March (Track World Cup) versus April (Spring Classics)
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:17
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
issoisso wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
rjc_43 wrote:
As a roadie, I know what I'd prefer to watch any day.
but the vast majority of of eurosport viewers aren't roadies so they have to base their decission on what the majority will be more interested in. The majority will be casual watchers and so track cycling will be more interesting to them so they will get more viewers and therefore more sponsorship money.
at the end of the day it's all about profit.
also, it's not just me trying to make a point. others are trying to make a point against me with even less evidence then i have offered. and considering it's me vs everyone at the moment, if you had evidence i wouldn't have a chance in this debate i am using generalised evidence, but it's more then you are offering.
I'm sorry, but saying "this is this way because I say so" is not evidence. Also, just because you don't like all the evidence that has been presented to you, does not discard it
i can't discard what i haven't seen . so far no-one has really offered any evidence that supports track being unpopular, viewing figures being higher for road races or anything else. i'm not saying this is the way because i say so. i'm saying this is the way because it's the way in other sports, as viewing figures for all world championships prove. why is cycling any different. my basic arguements are
1) because it's the world championships it will naturally generate more interest recieve more viewers then a normal cycling event. yes the big cycling events will recieve more interest amongst cycling fans. but alot of people will see it's the world champs and so watch it for that fact. the CI might be exiting, but it's not considered a big race.
2) it will attract more casual viewers who are more likely to watch track cycling then road cycling. as i've argued before, track cycling is more interesting to the casual viewer. can anyone offer evidence against this?
1+2(and other factors such as sponsorship and cost of rights)= the track WC was the easy choice over the CI (in my opinion). at the start people were saying the tv schedulers were stupid for picking the track champs. but in general it will generate more viewers.
and RJC thats the TdF. i've already stated that that is the only event in the whole sporting world that has more coverage then it's respective WC. i've accepted that already.
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:20
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
issoisso wrote:
rjc_43 wrote:
Taking just a random sample from the internet, based on website views of Eurosport UK, we can clearly see the peak for visitors is July. When all the good sporting events are on, and when the TdF is streamed on live audio. I'm using this as evidence in a greater popularity of road racing over Track crap.
https://siteanalytics.compete.com/euro...?metric=uv
In other sports, there's basically not much difference between March and April, so I'd say we can compare those two months and make the analogy of the results to cycling
Now compare March (Track World Cup) versus April (Spring Classics)
this debate isn't about the track world cup, it's about the world championships they're two completely different things. it's like comparing the world cup to the world club cup. both involve the whole world but are completely different in terms of magnitude. (maybe a bad example but i'm just thinking off the top of my head )
|
|
|
|
issoisso |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:26
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
2 things Ringo:
A. You can't make any of those points simply because Track and Road have different viewing bases, and as such are for all intents and purposes 2 different sports
B. I keep writing Track World Cup for some stupid reason. Just pretend I'm writing Track Worlds
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:33
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
i think we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. there is no real concrete evidence to back either side of the debate. it's just personal opinion as to how important you think track is and then how much more important it becomes if it's the track WC's. personaly i think that because it's the world champs it will automatically generate more interest as it does in other sports WC's. i may be wrong but i don't see how cycling would be any different, no matter what the discipline.
at the end of the day eurosport won't have just made the decission on a whim. they would have looked at past viewing figures, cost and potential eranings and chosen the one most benifitial to them in terms of attracting the most viewers and making the most profit.
obviously the WC's won the arguement so thats what they chose to show it.
i don't think i can put it any fairer than that.
|
|
|
|
Ad Bot |
Posted on 25-11-2024 05:53
|
Bot Agent
Posts: Countless
Joined: 23.11.09
|
|
IP: None |
|
|
rodda |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:51
|
Small Tour Specialist
Posts: 2276
Joined: 17-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
ringo182 wrote:
issoisso wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
rjc_43 wrote:
As a roadie, I know what I'd prefer to watch any day.
but the vast majority of of eurosport viewers aren't roadies so they have to base their decission on what the majority will be more interested in. The majority will be casual watchers and so track cycling will be more interesting to them so they will get more viewers and therefore more sponsorship money.
at the end of the day it's all about profit.
also, it's not just me trying to make a point. others are trying to make a point against me with even less evidence then i have offered. and considering it's me vs everyone at the moment, if you had evidence i wouldn't have a chance in this debate i am using generalised evidence, but it's more then you are offering.
I'm sorry, but saying "this is this way because I say so" is not evidence. Also, just because you don't like all the evidence that has been presented to you, does not discard it
i can't discard what i haven't seen . so far no-one has really offered any evidence that supports track being unpopular, viewing figures being higher for road races or anything else. i'm not saying this is the way because i say so. i'm saying this is the way because it's the way in other sports, as viewing figures for all world championships prove. why is cycling any different. my basic arguements are
1) because it's the world championships it will naturally generate more interest recieve more viewers then a normal cycling event. yes the big cycling events will recieve more interest amongst cycling fans. but alot of people will see it's the world champs and so watch it for that fact. the CI might be exiting, but it's not considered a big race.
2) it will attract more casual viewers who are more likely to watch track cycling then road cycling. as i've argued before, track cycling is more interesting to the casual viewer. can anyone offer evidence against this?
1+2(and other factors such as sponsorship and cost of rights)= the track WC was the easy choice over the CI (in my opinion). at the start people were saying the tv schedulers were stupid for picking the track champs. but in general it will generate more viewers.
and RJC thats the TdF. i've already stated that that is the only event in the whole sporting world that has more coverage then it's respective WC. i've accepted that already.
Um can you offer any evidence for that??
Can you offer any evidence against my belief that there is an inhabited planet 2309232 light years from here? No? Well it must be correct then.
Besides what are you? some industry specialist on the mindset of the casual sports viewing demographic?
A lot of your claims seem irrational and are not making a lot of sense.
Evidence please.
Edit: okay wrote that before reading your last post. Fair enough. discussion fin.
Edited by rodda on 23-03-2009 14:53
|
|
|
|
issoisso |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:56
|
Tour de France Champion
Posts: 22918
Joined: 08-02-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
ringo182 wrote:
i think we'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. there is no real concrete evidence to back either side of the debate. it's just personal opinion as to how important you think track is and then how much more important it becomes if it's the track WC's. personaly i think that because it's the world champs it will automatically generate more interest as it does in other sports WC's. i may be wrong but i don't see how cycling would be any different, no matter what the discipline.
It's what I said at the beginning: I've had this discussion over and over and over again with british people and they can't fathom that Track cycling is much lower in viewership and public interest outside britain. It's like telling them the sun won't rise tomorrow
The preceding post is ISSO 9001 certified
"I love him, I think he's great. He's transformed the sport in so many ways. Every person in cycling has benefitted from Lance Armstrong, perhaps not financially but in some sense" - Bradley Wiggins on Lance Armstrong
|
|
|
|
schleck93 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 14:59
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3715
Joined: 04-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
Ringo when you said that Denmark cared about trackcycling I think you should get your facts straight NOONE IN DENMARK CARES ABOUT TRACK CYCLING it only gets airtime just before the olympics, when they use 1 minute of the news talking to the guys from team pursuit team or if Alex Rasmussen and Michael Mørkøv has won a 6-day race, when Matti got a bronze in WC in september htey used days to talk about it.
BenBarnes wrote:
Thor wears a live rattlesnake as a condom.
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:04
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
schleck93 wrote:
Ringo when you said that Denmark cared about trackcycling I think you should get your facts straight NOONE IN DENMARK CARES ABOUT TRACK CYCLING it only gets airtime just before the olympics, when they use 1 minute of the news talking to the guys from team pursuit team or if Alex Rasmussen and Michael Mørkøv has won a 6-day race, when Matti got a bronze in WC in september htey used days to talk about it.
i haven't mentioned denmark in this whole debate. get your facts straight
|
|
|
|
ruben |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:04
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Also, when you said Belgium and Holland cared about track cycling.
THEY REALLY DO NOT CARE ONE BIT.
We had a little, and that's very little, interest when Theo Bos dominated the sprint in the pre-olympic years. But still, our national TV only showed highlights, and not much people watched that.
Yes the six-day events here are popular, BUT NOT ON TV, they barely show it, and noone watches it. The people who come to the track, are coming for the great atmosphere, the track racing itself is just an addition for them. And you'd better believe me, because I worked for the Six-Days of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. I've been there last year and this year to do work for them, and half the people in the audience don't even get what's going on at the track, but cheer anyway.
In Belgium it's more of less the same, I've spoken to Patrick Sercu, the 'godfather' of six-days nowadays, and even he thinks so. So what's makes you think a lot of dutch/belgian people will watch the track worlds?
I tell you, noone cares, and of the cycling fans here in Holland and Belgium, 99% will watch the E3 Prijs, Brabantse Pijl and Criterium International this weekend, rather than the Track worlds.
|
|
|
|
schleck93 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:08
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3715
Joined: 04-08-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
ringo182 wrote:
schleck93 wrote:
Ringo when you said that Denmark cared about trackcycling I think you should get your facts straight NOONE IN DENMARK CARES ABOUT TRACK CYCLING it only gets airtime just before the olympics, when they use 1 minute of the news talking to the guys from team pursuit team or if Alex Rasmussen and Michael Mørkøv has won a 6-day race, when Matti got a bronze in WC in september htey used days to talk about it.
i haven't mentioned denmark in this whole debate. get your facts straight
Sorry Ringo was Smoothie, so SMOOTHIE GET YOUR FACTS STRAiGHT
BenBarnes wrote:
Thor wears a live rattlesnake as a condom.
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:11
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
rodda wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
issoisso wrote:
ringo182 wrote:
rjc_43 wrote:
As a roadie, I know what I'd prefer to watch any day.
but the vast majority of of eurosport viewers aren't roadies so they have to base their decission on what the majority will be more interested in. The majority will be casual watchers and so track cycling will be more interesting to them so they will get more viewers and therefore more sponsorship money.
at the end of the day it's all about profit.
also, it's not just me trying to make a point. others are trying to make a point against me with even less evidence then i have offered. and considering it's me vs everyone at the moment, if you had evidence i wouldn't have a chance in this debate i am using generalised evidence, but it's more then you are offering.
I'm sorry, but saying "this is this way because I say so" is not evidence. Also, just because you don't like all the evidence that has been presented to you, does not discard it
i can't discard what i haven't seen . so far no-one has really offered any evidence that supports track being unpopular, viewing figures being higher for road races or anything else. i'm not saying this is the way because i say so. i'm saying this is the way because it's the way in other sports, as viewing figures for all world championships prove. why is cycling any different. my basic arguements are
1) because it's the world championships it will naturally generate more interest recieve more viewers then a normal cycling event. yes the big cycling events will recieve more interest amongst cycling fans. but alot of people will see it's the world champs and so watch it for that fact. the CI might be exiting, but it's not considered a big race.
2) it will attract more casual viewers who are more likely to watch track cycling then road cycling. as i've argued before, track cycling is more interesting to the casual viewer. can anyone offer evidence against this?
1+2(and other factors such as sponsorship and cost of rights)= the track WC was the easy choice over the CI (in my opinion). at the start people were saying the tv schedulers were stupid for picking the track champs. but in general it will generate more viewers.
and RJC thats the TdF. i've already stated that that is the only event in the whole sporting world that has more coverage then it's respective WC. i've accepted that already.
Um can you offer any evidence for that??
Can you offer any evidence against my belief that there is an inhabited planet 2309232 light years from here? No? Well it must be correct then.
Besides what are you? some industry specialist on the mindset of the casual sports viewing demographic?
A lot of your claims seem irrational and are not making a lot of sense.
Evidence please.
Edit: okay wrote that before reading your last post. Fair enough. discussion fin.
only evidence i can offer is personal experience of family and friends who don't like cycling but will tolerate a bit of track racing because they can see whats going on and there is something happening.
just to quote my girlfriends dad when trying to get him into the TdF last summer "they're not even racing. it's just 100 blokes pottering along the road".
again, i can only speak for britain. but over here there is no road cycling at all on terestrial tv. but there is occasional track racing because the bbc know that people who aren't interested in cycling might still watch it because they can follow it and understand whats going on. there's always a race to watch rather then 3 hours of not much happening and then a sprint.
|
|
|
|
ringo182 |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:16
|
Classics Specialist
Posts: 3472
Joined: 03-01-2008
PCM$: 1348.00
|
Ruben wrote:
Also, when you said Belgium and Holland cared about track cycling.
THEY REALLY DO NOT CARE ONE BIT.
We had a little, and that's very little, interest when Theo Bos dominated the sprint in the pre-olympic years. But still, our national TV only showed highlights, and not much people watched that.
Yes the six-day events here are popular, BUT NOT ON TV, they barely show it, and noone watches it. The people who come to the track, are coming for the great atmosphere, the track racing itself is just an addition for them. And you'd better believe me, because I worked for the Six-Days of Amsterdam and Rotterdam. I've been there last year and this year to do work for them, and half the people in the audience don't even get what's going on at the track, but cheer anyway.
In Belgium it's more of less the same, I've spoken to Patrick Sercu, the 'godfather' of six-days nowadays, and even he thinks so. So what's makes you think a lot of dutch/belgian people will watch the track worlds?
I tell you, noone cares, and of the cycling fans here in Holland and Belgium, 99% will watch the E3 Prijs, Brabantse Pijl and Criterium International this weekend, rather than the Track worlds.
well i don't know the reason but eurosport chose to show the track WC's. they must have a good reason for it so we should just accept it. obviously more people are interested in track then some are giving it credit for. maybe the only reason no-one is interested in it is because they all know they've got no chance of winning anything when Britain rock up for another clean sweep only joking. we've got a weak squad in comparison to how it looked last time round. taking out hoy has taken a couple of golds straight away.
|
|
|
|
tylew |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:20
|
Junior Rider
Posts: 47
Joined: 18-02-2008
PCM$: 200.00
|
Lance Armstrong falls and is in ambulance :S
|
|
|
|
trump |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:22
|
Amateur
Posts: 13
Joined: 28-12-2007
PCM$: 200.00
|
|
|
|
|
ruben |
Posted on 23-03-2009 15:31
|
Grand Tour Champion
Posts: 7721
Joined: 23-10-2006
PCM$: 200.00
|
Contador is making a victory dance
|
|
|